I was web browsing and came across a reference to this Gary Hart post on Huffington. It is, of course, preposterous drivel, but when I was looking through the moonbat comments, I came across this:To find who is responsible for the mayhem of secretarian violence, you have to look at the history and who actually will benefit from such violence.
Arab conspiracy theorists are fond of this line of argument, since it involves not looking at who's actually doing the violence... | The British when they were the greatest power in the world used 'divide and conquer' to subjugate its subject.
So'd the Romans and the Persians and most everybody who's ever conquered anybody else... | It divided the local population and made them wary of each other. In the case of Iraq, US is illegally occupying the country through its illegal war.
That particular cant describes the writer as a moonbat... |
Coughing Anus Kofi Annan stated that the Iraq war was illegal.
Yeah, and if the World Leader says it is illegal, it is illegal.Kofi also sez there's not much wrong with the UN, and none of it happened on his watch... | As Danial Pipes stated in his blog, the secretarian violence in Iraq was a good thing for US.
Does any Rantburger believe that Pipes said this?Probably someone would have noticed... | The British SAS men with Arab clothing was arrested with a car full of explosives and remote detonators in Basra.
WTF?? Has anyone heard of this event?
Made up out of whole cloth, as far as I know... | They were on a bombing mission against Shiite civilians to place a blame on Sunni insurgents.
Do these people actually believe the SAS, that venerated and honored unit of SPECOPS warriors, is committing acts of pure terror? I mean, what kind of worldview do you need to actually believe that? Sheesh.
I am of the opinion that the current sectarian violence was a product of US/British/Israeli military operations to divide the Iraqis.
Gotta get the Joooos in there somewhere.
The writer's expressing his opinion. It's a stupid opinion, but I guess it's his. | The history and evidence seems to point to that direction.
history? evidence?? Amazing.
Who benefits the most in dividing Iraq so that the previous oil can be reapt for the benefit of occupying forces.?
'previous oil'? What the F*#K is that? And 'reapt'? Like Sowt? 'benefit'? Like when the US import fuel from Kuwait and Turkey and paying top dollar? He seems to be able to read, but where is the getting this from? Amazing. May God save our nation from citizens like him
We're back to "it's all about oil." The writer has a set of expectations about the same size and shape as Procrustes' bed. He's not real big on empirical observation because it takes too much effort, so he goes with what he wants to believe. His opinion can be discounted. |
/rant |