| Submit your comments on this article |
| India-Pakistan |
| Facts are facts |
| 2006-03-18 |
| Reaction against the demand by Afghanistan that Pakistan stop naming their WMD after Afghan kings Farrukh Khan Pitafi There should be only one standard to judge everything. If you call yourself civilized, there should be no word like ‘double standards’ in your dictionary. Then, candidly speaking, there is only one tenuous difference between a dictator and a puppet ruler. The dictator pursues dirty policies to strengthen his own rule, whereas the puppet figurehead introduces even dirtier policies just to placate his foreign suzerains. From Pinochet to Najibullah, there emerges a clear pattern to substantiate this argument. If there is no gainsaying that General Musharraf is a despot, it can also not be denied that President Karzai is a puppet on strings. And in the world of puppeteering, there is a single rule that defines the game. The one who can sell his conscience once, can sell his soul to more than one bidder. While Karzai was planted by the US forces, his recent postures prove that he is effectually dancing to the Indian tunes as well. You don’t believe it? Just take a closer look. When owing to its identity crisis Pakistan wanted to sell its Central Asian credentials and historical profile, Karzai stood up claiming that Afghanistan was a South Asian country. When Pakistan named its missiles after the Muslim conquerors of Afghan origin, especially after Sultan Shahabuddin Muhammad Ghauri who had defeated Hindu Raja Prithvi Raj Chauhan (Prithvi being one of the Indian missiles), the Karzai government formally asks Islamabad not to use names of Afghan heroes for such a purpose, obviously to please the Indians. Likewise, the Afghan government literally begged the US administration to arrange President Bush’s surprise visit to Kabul before his itinerary so that a whimsical case against Pakistan could be presented to bolster New Delhi’s position vis-à -vis Islamabad. In doing so, Mr Karzai cared a fig about the fact that India, which has sold its strategic ally Iran to win a nuclear deal from Washington, can do much worse to his country to gain much lesser benefits in return. The question of using names of Afghan rulers for our missiles too needs a closer look. In my view, Pakistan should have no qualms in renaming its missiles provided two queries are addressed. First, since the concept of nation states and hence of national heroes has evolved ages after the rule of Mahmud Ghaznavi and Shahabuddin Ghauri, does Kabul recognise Pakistan as a separate political entity dating back to the mediaeval ages? If it does not, this request obviously holds no water and therefore is a malicious attempt to deny Pakistan its heritage and history. Yet, if it does, it is high time that Kabul acknowledged and apologised for the horrendous crimes committed against our people by its former rulers. The scorched earth policy of these and other Afghan rulers, who considered areas now comprising Pakistan as their expendable periphery, is proverbial. Ghaznavi ransacked the region and took away the region’s wealth and most valuable possessions. Ghauri quenched his thirst with this region’s blood. Ahmed Shah Abdali, in the name of piety, robbed the land of its virginity and purity. None of these rulers committed any less a crime here than Kaiser William II’s armies in Europe before and during World War I. Why then, what is sauce for the goose should not be sauce for the gander? And then the crimes do not end here. Our Afghan brethren proved mercenaries to the British in their war of our conquest and confronted the Raj only when they were not paid money. When the Muslims of South Asia tried to migrate to their country owing to continuous political persecution and a religious edict, Afghanistan like modern day Australia closed its borders and let uncountable amongst them perish. When Pakistan was created, these folks left no stone unturned to snatch NWFP and Balochistan away from us in the name of Pakhtoonistan and Greater Balochistan, by fuelling unrest and insurgency in these areas. There has hardly ever been a time when they did not aid our enemies. And is Zalmay Khalilzad, the sworn enemy of Pakistan, not an Afghan by origin? What did Pakistan do in response? It opened its doors to the Afghan refugees during the Soviet invasion. It tried to broker the best deal possible between the Afghan political groups so that a lasting post-Cold War settlement could be achieved. Even when it all failed, the Taliban policy was created only to ensure that the Afghans do not resort to their old habits of serving Pakistan’s enemies. If it blew up in our face, it was only because of the fact that it was a logical extension of the US strategy of using Islam to counter communism in Afghanistan. Even at this moment, Pakistani soldiers are dying in their own country fighting a war to protect Kabul’s new regime and often innocent Pakistani citizens are killed, abruptly dubbed as collateral damage, for the purpose. Small voices are heard already in Islamabad, expressing doubts that maybe it is in the Afghan blood to deceive their Muslim brothers and to fraternise with their enemies. These voices further point out that maybe it is better to rename our missiles, because the weapons christened with the Afghan names may one day explode on our own heads rather than on our enemy’s. I can only hope that they are wrong. Yet given the lessons of our long past history, it seems reasonable to just rename them. Since there should not be double standards in affairs of any realm, Pakistan should ask Kabul to table its demands of renaming the missiles through some international forum. Once Kabul does that, owns Ghaznavi, Ghauri and Abdali as its leaders, and brands Pakistan a separate entity since those times, Islamabad should not have any hesitation to not only rename its missiles but also to demand reparations for the crimes committed by these people against our ancestors. Germany had to pay 132 billion gold marks or $40 billion (which in Kissinger’s words are equal to $323 billion today) as reparations after World War I. I think the same amount would be good enough for us. Or else Pakistan should be allowed to devise its Marshall Plan for Afghanistan. After all, there must be one standard to judge everything. As for Mullah Omar’s alleged presence in Pakistan, even though Islamabad knows he is not here, he was head of a government that we recognised. Hence we have every right to accord him diplomatic immunity if we so wish. Meanwhile, the friends in Kabul should first look into the mirror before pointing a finger at Pakistan. The writer is an Islamabad-based independent columnist and media policy consultant |
| Posted by:john |
| #7 6, could you possibly be a bit less opaque please. Some of us here (me, for example) need things kind of 'spelled out' for them. Sorry if I am not as quick, but I would like to understand what the hell you are talking about. Thanks in advance. |
| Posted by: Whiskey Mike 2006-03-18 23:02 |
| #6 With a title like Facts are Facts they figured nobody would read it. |
| Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2006-03-18 19:56 |
| #5 Cabal work, in the last post, on the last thread. |
| Posted by: 6 2006-03-18 19:23 |
| #4 done |
| Posted by: john 2006-03-18 15:33 |
| #3 John, can you send me an email? |
| Posted by: Seafarious 2006-03-18 13:52 |
| #2 Quite odd that Pakistanis would think India would name a missile after a defeated King of Delhi. Especially one so gullible. Mohammed Ghauri attacked Pritviraj many times but was repeatedly defeated. He was however forgiven after each assault. The final time, he won. The muslim Ghauri was not so forgiving as his Hindu enemy Prithviraj. He had Prithviraj sent in chains to Afghanistan, where he was blinded. He was later tortured and beheaded. Even in death, he was disgraced. He was buried at the entrance to Ghauri's tomb, so that vistors would forever walk over the unmarked grave of the king of Delhi. The Indian Prithvi missile is named after the sanskit word for "earth". Indian missiles are named Prithvi - earth, Akash - sky, Agni - Fire, Sagarike - oceanic, Nag - snake, Astra - weapon |
| Posted by: john 2006-03-18 12:27 |
| #1 It all boils down to reparations. Even if Mullah Omar isn't in Pakistan it's ok if he is...so why doesn't this wanna be AP stringer turn Omar in for the fast $10M reward? |
| Posted by: Inspector Clueso 2006-03-18 10:37 |