| Submit your comments on this article |
| Iraq |
| US determining what to do if civil war breaks out in Iraq |
| 2006-03-19 |
| America has begun making plans to deal with a civil war in Iraq, three years after the invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein. As sectarian violence continues to claim lives every day, Donald Rumsfeld, the American defence secretary, has disclosed that United States military intelligence is holding war games to predict what might happen in such a situation. Mr Rumsfeld's admission that "the intelligence community are thinking about this and analysing it" comes despite the White House's insistence that Iraq is not slipping into civil war. As tomorrow's third anniversary of the invasion of Iraq approaches, the administration is under pressure to devise strategies in the event of conflict. President George W Bush and his officials have so far refused to discuss what has become known as the "Plan B" scenario, declaring that the US military will stay in Iraq until a stable, democratic government is established. But this policy is being challenged by Congress, which last week announced an inquiry to assess the situation. The bipartisan panel of senior members has said it will "take fresh eyes on the target" and recommend a course that would include dealing with civil war. The Democratic senator Joe Biden said the inquiry would "not only look at the situation as it exists now, but look at potential alternatives based on a Plan B or a Plan C, depending on what happens on the ground". There are signs that the internal strife, that has affected much of central and southern Iraq, may be spreading. Last week, rioting broke out in the Kurdish-controlled north, until now free of violence. A teenage boy died when security forces fired at a crowd of about 7,000 protesting at alleged government corruption. The rioters also destroyed a monument to 5,000 Kurds killed in a gas attack on Halabja in 1998. New fighting flared north of Baghdad last Saturday as a joint US-Iraqi force scoured the Sunni Muslim heartland in the third day of a counter-insurgency operation. Iraq's government claimed that the operation - during which three US soldiers have died - captured suspects in the killing of a prominent journalist. But Iraq's own national security adviser, Lt Gen Wafiq al-Samaraei, urged the Americans to loosen their security net around the Sunni-dominated city of Samarra, and complained that too many "innocent" young men were being rounded up. The White House has meanwhile dismissed Iran's offer of talks to discuss Iraq as "a stunt" to divert attention from the country's nuclear programme. The talks were first proposed by the US last year but had been ignored by Teheran until now - the week in which the United Nations Security Council is due to discuss the programme. |
| Posted by:Dan Darling |
| #7 Wack the victors? |
| Posted by: gromgoru 2006-03-19 21:36 |
| #6 Not going to happen ('cept in the dreams of the left and the MSM). |
| Posted by: DMFD 2006-03-19 15:55 |
| #5 Wonder what the world is going to do when Civil War [Part Duex] breaks out in the US? Better not pick the wrong side to help, cause the winner is going to be big and mean and will make you pay for getting in the way. |
| Posted by: Threamble Phoger4791 2006-03-19 15:08 |
| #4 Tony's got money-flow problems and he's trying to save his skin. Mebbe we should follow England's stance during our civil war. |
| Posted by: anonymous2u 2006-03-19 13:16 |
| #3 What the hell is going on in Downing Street? They want a redo of 1922. |
| Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2006-03-19 10:41 |
| #2 i got a plan. Let them kill each other off |
| Posted by: Ebbineque Gletle8901 2006-03-19 10:22 |
| #1 This is like the second week in a row that an article like this has appeared in a British Sunday paper. "US examining who to back in Iraqi civil war" or some such. Last week it was the Times. What the hell is going on in Downing Street? |
| Posted by: Rory B. Bellows 2006-03-19 03:46 |