Submit your comments on this article |
Britain |
Gang 'planned UK terror campaign' |
2006-03-21 |
![]() They are accused of conspiring between January 1, 2003, and March 31, 2004, with Canadian Mohammed Momin Khawaja and with others unknown, to "cause by explosive substances, an explosion or explosions of a nature likely to endanger life". The accused are: Omar Khyam, 24, Waheed Mahmood, 34, Shujah Mahmood, 19, and Jawad Akbar, 22, all from Crawley, West Sussex; Anthony Garcia (also known as Rahman Adam), 23, of Ilford, east London; Nabeel Hussain, 20, of Horley, Surrey, and Salahuddin Amin, 31, from Luton, Bedfordshire. Khyam, Garcia and Hussain also deny a charge under the Terrorism Act 2000 of possession of an article for terrorism - 600kg of ammonium nitrate fertiliser - between November 5, 2003, and March 31, 2004. The fertiliser was found at a west London storage depot in 2004. Brothers Khyam and Shuja Mahmood also deny having aluminium powder for terrorism between October 1, 2003, and March 31, 2004. Aluminium powder can also be used to make bombs. The judge, Sir Michael Astill, warned the jury not to be influenced by anything outside the trial process, saying: "Terrorism has been at the forefront of matters and debate worldwide for a long time. "It became the subject of much discussion of late in the United Kingdom after the bombings in London on July 7, 2005. Much of the factual reporting has been fair and accurate. Some of it has not. "Many different theories and views have been offered and inevitably most members of the public will have an opinion about terrorism and its causes. It is therefore reasonable to expect that you bring to this court a point of view. It would not be reasonable to expect you to approach your task now as if you had never had an opinion." But, he added, it was essential that the jurors tried to put aside any opinion they did have. He warned the jury not to carry out their own research on the internet and told them that the trial was likely to last "many months". |
Posted by:Steve |
#7 "harmless but well-bombed farmers..." Explains why the furrows weave back-and-forth. |
Posted by: Fordesque 2006-03-21 19:04 |
#6 The seven, all British citizens, deny the allegations. all of Pakistani descent |
Posted by: Angeck Glailet3860 2006-03-21 17:25 |
#5 They're just harmless farmers wanting to increase their crop yield. Surely in this situation, that should read, "harmless but well-bombed farmers..." ;-) |
Posted by: trailing wife 2006-03-21 14:09 |
#4 What I've been reading about Blair lately, this is competition. |
Posted by: anonymous2u 2006-03-21 13:10 |
#3 Actually, there is a specific opinion that an individual should have when being empaneled as a juror. Namely that; A PERSON IS INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY |
Posted by: Zenster 2006-03-21 13:05 |
#2 "Many different theories and views have been offered and inevitably most members of the public will have an opinion about terrorism and its causes. It is therefore reasonable to expect that you bring to this court a point of view. It would not be reasonable to expect you to approach your task now as if you had never had an opinion." Bravo! Indeed refreshing, but unfortunately, this brave statement alone would preclude Sir Michael from a US Supreme Court appointment. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2006-03-21 12:44 |
#1 They're just harmless farmers wanting to increase their crop yield. |
Posted by: Glenmore 2006-03-21 12:31 |