You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Unethical Treatment of Humans
2006-03-23
Students from PETA, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, drew an angry crowd on Sproul after displaying images that compared animal treatment to the lynching and enslavement of black Americans. About a dozen Berkeley students furiously engaged the PETA members, accusing the animal rights group of racism. The situation intensified when one member of the crowd threw ketchup and mustard on the PETA display and another tore down part of the exhibit. If your message doesn't play in Berkely, perhaps you should rethink it
One image presented by PETA featured a chained elephant foot juxtaposed with the chained foot of a slave. Another showed black individuals hanging from a tree by their necks contrasted with the image of a cow being hung by its hind legs. Several black students shouted down the PETA students and called for the display to be taken down. One student who was upset by PETA’s comparison of slavery to animal mistreatment shouted amid tears, “I’m not trying to say that people should eat meat. I understand you, but the way you’re depicting our history, the way you are depicting the things that happened to us, the thing that happened to our ancestors, it’s not ok, it’s not ok!”

Another student, identified as Autumn by her peers, tore down one of the images in a fit of rage. Dominique Nisperos, a third year Cal student, was also upset by PETA’s display and argued with one of the group’s members. When asked if tearing down the display was appropriate on a campus that touts its free speech history, Nisperos responded, “I can see why they did it.” She added that bringing up the free speech issue “isn’t getting to the root of the problem. The means at expressing [PETA’s] message was racist.” Veronica Nisperos, a Berkeley student also incensed by the exhibit, stated that the group did have a point, but the way in which they made it, “created opposition among people who should be allies.”

Sengeeta Kumar, who led the PETA group, was surprised to have encountered such a reaction at UC Berkeley. “I was really hoping that people would think critically…it became very emotional and almost dangerous in the sense that people were threatening and pulling things down and it just became unsafe,” she said. Kumar noted that her group has taken the exhibit to 13 different schools and never faced a hostile reaction.

PETA eventually gave into the pressure and dismantled their display. Kumar expressed disappointment in her organization’s inability to get their message across. “When emotions are risen, people can be closed to dialogue.” She added, “We are all part of oppression, of beings who can’t speak for themselves. Animals are enslaved in our hands. This exhibit isn’t about demeaning any people, it about uplifting humanity.” PETA members spent the rest of the afternoon wiping off the ketchup and mustard that was sprayed on their display.
Posted by:Steve

#8  Now, now, don't insult innocent "M1 Tanks mean Nothing To Us" fruitcakes - its bad enough we Male Brutes can't enjoy waffles or hoagies anymore until after America comes under OWG. Califerney is going after chocolate.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-03-23 22:39  

#7  animalrights
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2006-03-23 16:25  

#6  If you stuck with that Holocaust motif PETA was pushing a few months back, Sengetta, I'll bet you nobody at Berkeley would've bothered you at all...
Posted by: tu3031   2006-03-23 12:58  

#5  Veronica Nisperos, a Berkeley student also incensed by the exhibit, stated that the group did have a point, but the way in which they made it, “created opposition among people who should be allies.”

Why exactly should those people be allied with a far-Left wacko group? Because they are black?
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats   2006-03-23 12:51  

#4  Victimhood vs Victimhood

My victimhood is more important than your victimhood. Nah, nah, nah.

Must be getting desperate when the 'victim' game starts to lose its value to sell guilt and the players have to fight among themselves for the few remaining angsts available to con people with.
Posted by: Slomoper Snush1141   2006-03-23 11:16  

#3  Fruitcake vs. fruitcake.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-03-23 11:01  

#2  This exhibit isnÂ’t about demeaning any people, it about uplifting humanity.

Bullcrap. It is about demeaning people that don't agree with you and trying to shame them into your way of thinking. Good for the people that tore down this abomination. PETA needs killed.
Posted by: DarthVader   2006-03-23 10:34  

#1  Free speech for us.... (well some of us...) but not for thee....
Posted by: CrazyFool   2006-03-23 10:28  

00:00