You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Iraq Shi'ite ayatollah wants US envoy sacked
2006-03-31
This demand made as part of Friday prayers, I presume in the Sadrist end of town...
A leading Iraqi Shi'ite cleric on Friday demanded the United States sack its envoy [Afghan-born ambassador and Sunni muslim] Zalmay Khalilzad, heading a push for a unity government, accusing him of siding with fellow Sunni Muslims in the sectarian conflict gripping the country. Ayatollah Mohammed al-Yacoubi's call at Friday prayers came as political leaders held their latest round of negotiations to form a new government, months after parliamentary elections in December, as sectarian bloodshed rises.

In a sermon read out at mosques for Friday prayers, Yacoubi said Washington had underestimated the conflict between Shi'ites and the once dominant Sunni Arab minority, which many fear threatens to trigger a civil war. "By this, they are either misled by reports, which lack objectivity and credibility, submitted to the United States by their sectarian ambassador to Iraq ... or they are denying this fact," Yacoubi said in the message, later issued as a statement. "It (the United States) should not yield to terrorist blackmail and should not be deluded or misled by spiteful sectarians. It should replace its ambassador to Iraq if it wants to protect itself from further failures." After the imam of Baghdad's Rahman mosque read that line, worshippers chanted "Allahu Akbar".

Yacoubi is the spiritual guide for the Fadhila party, one of the smaller but still influential components of the dominant Islamist Alliance bloc. He is not part of the senior clerical council around Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani in Najaf. Nonetheless, Shi'ite politicians said his comments reflected widespread disenchantment among them with the ambassador. "It's a very good statement," one senior official in the Alliance, not from Fadhila, said of Yacoubi's sermon.

Khalilzad, who has been in Iraq 10 months, has been criticised by Shi'ite leaders, who openly resent his championing of efforts to tempt Sunnis away from armed revolt into a coalition government. Yacoubi said: "The American ambassador and the tyrants of the Arab states are giving political support to those parties who provide political cover for the terrorists."

Alliance leader Abdul Aziz al-Hakim accused Khalilzad last month of provoking the Samarra bombing by making remarks critical of "sectarian" tendencies among the Shi'ite leadership. Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari has also criticised U.S. "interference" this week in Iraq's political process. Jaafari's nomination to a second term by the Alliance is a major sticking point in talks with Sunnis and ethnic Kurds on a government. Shi'ite politicians say Khalilzad has delivered messages from U.S. President George W. Bush to both Hakim and Sistani in the past week urging them to drop Jaafari, whose nomination was secured with the support of Iranian-backed cleric and militia leader Moqtada al-Sadr. U.S. diplomats deny taking sides in the issue. Khalilzad is now planning talks with Iran,
Gah.
Washington's old enemy in the region, to try to ease the crisis in Iraq. The United States accuses Shi'ite Iran of fomenting violence.
Posted by:Seafarious

#3  I have heard it described that Iraq now has the second best military in the Middle East.

The militias do not stand a chance. America won't have to deal with this problem.

Would explain why Sadr and his minions are deparate to con the media into blaming the US, even to arranging hoax massacres. The Jenin Strategy? Just a ploy to keep the Coalition from letting the Iraqi army go to it.
Posted by: john   2006-03-31 21:07  

#2  Sadr and his fellow institutionalistas need to keep talking. I hope someone in Washington is paying attention, so that when the final decision is made about what to do with Sadr and friends, their comments like this will move "whack and stack" to the top of the list of options.

Our biggest problem in Iraq is that we've been too nice. The islamofruitcakes believe we can't be mean enough to defeat them. We need to disabuse them of that silly, incoherent, and totally inaccurate idea. We need to come down HARD on Sadr and his minions in a way that is totally anal. I don't think we'd have any problems after that, even with Iran.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2006-03-31 16:15  

#1  Never shun the chance to talk with your enemy. Such talks often reveal huge gaps in planning, secret weapons, timetables, and a vertitable cornucopia of other critical intelligence data.

Of course, such unintentional exposures can work both ways, so if possible you want the meeting recorded and heavily analyzed, to detect both their, and your own departures from discretion.

Imagine what information could be gleaned with just a few carefully crafted questions, later analyzed by audio lie detection?
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-03-31 10:12  

00:00