| Submit your comments on this article |
| Israel-Palestine-Jordan |
| 200,000 Homosexuals headed for Jerusalem |
| 2006-04-30 |
| Not only the Muslim world means to steal Jerusalem from the Jews, but one of the planet’s most militant movements also has the ancient Holy City in its sights. In August this year, hundreds of thousands of men and women who practice perverse sexual lifestyles plan to descend on Jerusalem for a week of wickedness. Not content with morally polluting cities "from San Francisco to Montreal to Sydney to Berlin," the movement whose members insist they have the right to flaunt their behavior in the face of the rest of the world want to notch up a victory in the capital of Israel. Having successfully conquered Jerusalem, these people clearly hope to ensure that no other city on earth will be able to withstand their assault. The aim of these homosexuals – who in 2000 purposely held their first international event in Rome in order, according to them, to have it on "the Pope's doorstep" – is to confront and defy the teachings and followers of Judeo-Christian faith. Their destination this year is the city of King David, a man after God’s own heart; who’s son Solomon built a temple here for the LORD. It is Israel’s God Who says that for a man to lie with another man is "an abomination" (Leviticus 18:23) that is "against nature" (Romans 1:26-28). In a classic case of calling black white and evil good, the champions of homosexuality are proudly proclaiming their purpose under the banner of "WorldPride". They are coming to what they even dare call "the holy city" in "a massive demonstration of dignity [sic], pride and boundary-crossing celebration," – homo-speak for public displays of lewd and lustful behavior. As they do on their marches elsewhere, they plan to parade through Jerusalem on August 10, men openly fondling and kissing men, women groping and kissing women, while bodies will be bared for all passers by to see. The left-wing Israeli government that will be sworn in next week will almost certainly not oppose an event that promises millions of homosexual dollars in revenue. Jerusalem’s ultra-orthodox mayor is not expected to try to prevent this outrage after the liberal Israeli Supreme Court fined him for expressing his opposition to a much smaller march a few years ago. With just four months to go before the scheduled event, it is unclear whether Judeo-Christian leaders will be willing and able to rally enough opposition to stop it. I suspect that homosexuals have had enough of religious bigotry, and are now starting to confront those who use them as scapegoats. There have already been several incidents in the ME, and more should be anticipated. |
| Posted by:Anonymoose |
| #6 especially since NAMBLA would feel at home in Islamic society |
| Posted by: Frank G 2006-04-30 23:45 |
| #5 Actually, they have been making a fuss in Islamic countries, mostly Egypt and Arabia. In either case they push the law just a bit, resulting in a mass arrest with so little evidence that they get turned loose. In Egypt, there were the "homosexual marriage" parties that were arrested, for example. But in court, they couldn't identify the "groom" or "bride" or whoever was marrying them, and otherwise what they were doing *could* be seen as properly Islamic, i.e. no girls allowed at male parties. In other words, they use Sharia to beat Sharia. "We aren't homosexuals, we are good Moslems. If you convict us, what should we do, invite women to our next party? Or are you saying that single gender groups are homosexual?" Catch-22. |
| Posted by: Anonymoose 2006-04-30 23:43 |
| #4 I'd be impressed if some of their open fondling and nudity took place in the predominantly Arab (and Muslim) part of Jerusalem, though....even if they hightailed it back to the safety of the Jewish areas after they finished parading around. Bonus points if they had a sign or two insinuating that ol' Yasser was one of their special "friends", died of AIDS, etc. |
| Posted by: Desert Blondie 2006-04-30 20:48 |
| #3 ewww |
| Posted by: Oztralian 2006-04-30 19:50 |
| #2 Moose - as zazz's comment shows - they won't confront Islamists. If they had any real "balls" they'd be in front of Islamist embassies daily, chanting no to the Koran! No more Taliban! Bunch of feel-good pussies afraid to take it to the worst abusers |
| Posted by: Frank G 2006-04-30 19:47 |
| #1 Jerusalem's easy... how about Islamabad, Tehran, or Riyadh? I see, that wouldn't be defying the teachings and followers of Judeo-Christian faith. |
| Posted by: zazz 2006-04-30 19:16 |