You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
China backs away from tough UNSC action on Iran
2006-05-09
China made clear Monday that it opposed the core of a Western UN resolution ordering Tehran to curb its nuclear program but would not use its veto power to kill the measure. Russia and China, which along with the U.S., Britain and France have veto power in the 15-nation Security Council, fear too much pressure on Iran would be self-defeating or precipitate an oil crisis.

"My position is clear, because Chapter 7 is about enforcement measures," Ambassador Wang Guangya told reporters. "My understanding is that a resolution of the Security Council is itself legally binding, so all the parties have to implement Security Council resolutions."
And we all saw how well that worked with Saddam, didn't we.
Many international lawyers disagree and say the only way to make a resolution legally binding is to invoke Chapter 7. "We are not thinking about a veto. We are thinking about unifying the whole council," said Wang, whose country rarely casts vetoes.
Any chance they're setting the stage to abstain?
Posted by:Steve White

#4  So, it's Russia's turn for the veto?

China will veto the next one (Sudan, maybe)?
Posted by: Jackal   2006-05-09 16:07  

#3  LH, an abstention is the best we are going to get on this and you could be right, we might get it. If they do, you should give us an I told you so. We deserve it.
Posted by: Mike N.   2006-05-09 14:36  

#2  an abstention is what we've wanted from them. Thats what the maneuvering is all about. Ive been one of the few here suggesting that theres a possibility they wont veto. Of course its still quite possible, maybe even likely, that they will.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2006-05-09 09:36  

#1  The hint of Taiwan being 'nuclearized' can be a powerful inducement to rethink one's position...hint..hint!
Posted by: smn   2006-05-09 02:14  

00:00