You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
'Britain misused power against Afghan hijackers'
2006-05-11
London's High Court accused the British government on Wednesday of "an abuse of power" for refusing to allow nine Afghan asylum seekers who hijacked a plane to Britain to stay in the country as refugees.
"Sanctuary! Or else."
In a fiercely critical ruling, judge Jeremy Sullivan overturned the government's decision and said the conduct of the home office (interior ministry) deserved "the strongest mark of the court's disapproval". "It is difficult to conceive of a clearer case of conspicuous unfairness amounting to an abuse of power by a public authority," he said. The High Court ranks third in Britain's legal hierarchy below the Court of Appeal and House of Lords, which is the upper house of parliament and highest court in the country.

The nine Afghans, armed with knives and guns, hijacked a Boeing 727 plane in February 2000 after the aircraft left Afghanistan's capital city of Kabul on an internal flight. They ordered the pilot to fly to Stansted airport near London, where they told negotiators via radio they had fled the Taliban regime and would blow up the plane and kill everybody on board if they were not granted political asylum in Britain.
Apparently you can take the asylum seekers out of the Taliban, but you can't take the Taliban out of the asylum seekers.
Posted by:Fred

#9  So it appears that wanting to fight against your own countrymen is a "human right"

Well ... there is rugby.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-05-11 20:57  

#8  The Taliban is no longer in power. What's their excuse? Sounds to me like they just want to get on the dole.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2006-05-11 17:01  

#7  Well, if they're not granted asylum, they might be treated harshly in their homeland.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2006-05-11 14:10  

#6  What the fuck is wrong with that judge? Is he taking crazy pills? YOu are going to grant asylum to people commiting acts of terrorism to get it?
Posted by: Phetle Clert8457   2006-05-11 13:00  

#5  I share your pain, shep, from the other side of the Pond. This is getting out of hand. Another article I read about this trial sez the UK gov't has already spent between £20-30 million in prosecuting this case and providing benefits (!) to the 'refugees' and their families. That article also noted that the hijackers kept their hostages for 70 hours of negotiations on the tarmac and finally SAS had to storm the plane.
Posted by: Seafarious   2006-05-11 12:04  

#4  nothing suprises me anymore - we are on the path to bitter failure in the UK no two ways about it, yes its all doom and gloom from me today but ive come to accept the fact the Uk is fcked beyond all repair unless some mega huge cival war broke out (heres hoping!). I am ashamed of my country and whats its turned into - a mish mash and fcked up laws in a multi cultural nightmare where the rights of the criminal are more then the rights of the law abiding, fcked beyond repair im afraid unless people start and stand up to this madness but lets face it that aint gonna happen with the brain washed mainstream media educated imbiciles that make up 95% percent of Britain.
Posted by: ShepUK   2006-05-11 11:57  

#3  The law demands that the law means nothing.

We need to save law from lawyers and judges. They're destroying it.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2006-05-11 08:02  

#2  Sullivan is the same nutcase who last month ruled "that taking away the passport of a terror suspect in Manchester who wanted to travel to Iraq to fight British troops was a breach of his human rights"
So it appears that wanting to fight against your own countrymen is a "human right"
It would be interesting to see how far the courts allow that right to go. Acts of terrorism perhaps?
That's right, terrorism is also legal according to Sullivan, if you only but mouth "refuge, refuge"
Posted by: tipper   2006-05-11 08:01  

#1  Stupid. Stupid. Stupid.
Posted by: SPoD   2006-05-11 01:45  

00:00