| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Lack of prosecutions demoralizing Border Patrol |
| 2006-05-19 |
| By Elliot Spagat ASSOCIATED PRESS 2:16 p.m. May 18, 2006 SAN DIEGO – The vast majority of people caught smuggling immigrants across the border near San Diego are never prosecuted for the offense, demoralizing the Border Patrol agents making the arrests, according to an internal document obtained by The Associated Press. “It is very difficult to keep agents' morale up when the laws they were told to uphold are being watered-down or not prosecuted,” the report says. The report offers a stark assessment of the situation at a Border Patrol station responsible for guarding 13 miles of mountainous border east of the city. Federal officials say it reflects a reality along the entire 2,000-mile border: Judges and federal attorneys are so swamped that only the most egregious smuggling cases are prosecuted. Only 6 percent of 289 suspected immigrant smugglers were prosecuted by the federal government for that offense in the year ending in September 2004, according to the report. Some were instead prosecuted for another crime. Other cases were declined by federal prosecutors, or the suspect was released by the Border Patrol. The report raises doubts about the value of tightening security along the Mexican border. President Bush wants to hire 6,000 more Border Patrol agents and dispatch up to 6,000 National Guardsmen. He did not mention overburdened courts in his Oval Office address Monday on immigration. The report was provided to the AP by the office of Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., who has accused the chief federal prosecutor in San Diego of being lax on smuggling cases. Issa's office said it was an internal Border Patrol report written last August. It was unclear who wrote it. The lack of prosecutions is “demoralizing the agents and making a joke out of our system of justice,” said T.J. Bonner, president of the National Border Patrol Council, which represents agents. “It is certainly a weak link in our immigration-enforcement chain.” The 41-page report says federal prosecutors in San Diego typically prosecute smugglers who commit “dangerous/violent activity” or guide at least 12 illegal immigrants across the border. But other smugglers know they are only going to get “slapped on the wrist,” according to the report. The report cites a 19-year-old U.S. citizen caught three times in a two-week period in 2004 trying to sneak people from Tijuana, Mexico, to San Diego in his car trunk, two at a time. “This is an example of a kid who knows the system,” the report says. “What is true is that he will probably never be prosecuted if he only smuggles only one or two bodies at a time.” The report also cites a Mexican citizen who was caught in Arizona and California driving with illegal immigrants and was released each time to Mexico. He was prosecuted the fourth time and sentenced to five years in prison, after two illegal immigrants in his van died in a crash. U.S. Attorney Carol Lam in San Diego said about half her 110 attorneys work on border cases in an area where the Border Patrol made nearly 140,000 arrests last year. She said she gives highest priority to the most serious cases, including suspects with long histories of violent crime or offenders who endanger others' lives. “We figure out how many cases our office can handle, start from the worst and work our way down,” she said. Lam said many suspected migrant smugglers are prosecuted instead for re-entering the country after being deported, a crime that can be proved with documents. Smuggling cases are more difficult to prosecute because they require witnesses to testify. The Border Patrol, which would neither confirm nor deny the document's authenticity, said prosecutors in San Diego recently agreed to prosecute a Top 20 list of smugglers if they are caught. The Justice Department in Washington declined to comment. However, at a congressional hearing last month, Rep. Ric Keller, R-Fla., told Attorney General Alberto Gonzales that Lam's record on migrant smuggling was “a pathetic failure.” Gonzales replied that he was urging U.S. attorneys to more actively enforce laws but noted that immigration cases were “a tremendous strain and burden” along the border. Peter Nunez, a former U.S. attorney in San Diego, said prosecutors along the border struggle with limited resources and a huge caseload of immigration cases. “This is not an indictment of the U.S. attorney's office, because you have to deal with the realities of the caseload, but it is an indictment of how badly Congress and presidents have handled the immigration system,” he said. The report says immigrants in the area paid an average of $1,398 to be guided across the border in 2004. “Smugglers are making lots of money breaking the immigration laws, and there is not much incentive for them to stop these illegal activities,” it says. “The smugglers know that even if they are caught, it will be difficult to punish them.” |
| Posted by:mcsegeek1 |
| #5 "...jury selection consultant." A good start would be to do away with this judicial travesty. After we seal the border, and dig those empty graves! -M |
| Posted by: Manolo 2006-05-19 18:25 |
| #4 Anyone who has ever been summoned for jury duty on a deportation case realizes just how badly we shoot ourselves in the foot. Although I was not selected, I found the selection process to be illuminating. The defendant who had been deported twice before was there with his tax-payer funded defense team, two lawyers and a jury selection consultant. The judge asked if anyone thought that deportation hearings were a waste of time and clogged the federal court system. Anyone who responded affirmatively was asked to leave. Further, there were an inordinate number of questions about our thoughts about illegal immigration, anyone who responded that the operative word was illegal was dismissed. Anyone with a military background was deselected by the taxpayer paid jury consultant. The only one who smiled through this travesty was the defendant, who was prima facie guilty having been arrested a 3rd time in the US without papers. He was enjoying the fact that the US taxpayer was paying for a six week long circus involving no fewer than 5 lawyers, a jury consultant, the judge and all the other court personnel, about 50 potential jurors and 18 final jurors, for his amusement. Anyone who has ever had any contact with this charade who is not demoralized has already been lobotomized. |
| Posted by: RWV 2006-05-19 13:10 |
| #3 Sounds like I'd rather 6,000 more prosecutors than 6,000 more border patrollers. |
| Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2006-05-19 11:13 |
| #2 Gonzales replied that he was urging U.S. attorneys to more actively enforce laws but noted that immigration cases were “a tremendous strain and burden” along the border. Yeah... you know prosecuting murders and rapes als is a 'tremendous strain' perhaps we shouldn't prosecute those either. If you start prosecuting these and close the frigging border you wouldn't have such a 'strain'. DOH! |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2006-05-19 11:04 |
| #1 When you get no justice from those officials responsible, then you take matters into your own hands. I believe volunteers should go to the border and start digging 2 x 6 x 6s so the border patrol has an option. The sight of all those open graves will send a message to the wetbacks also. |
| Posted by: wxjames 2006-05-19 10:50 |