You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
'Hobbits' didn't really exist, say scientists
2006-05-19
The sensational discovery of what appeared to be the skeleton of a new species of small humans - dubbed hobbits - has been dismissed by a team of scientists.

A 3ft skeleton found on the Indonesian island of Flores in 2003 was said to be a new branch of the human family tree and named Homo floresiensis. Scientists dubbed the species "hobbits" after the characters in the Lord of the Rings trilogy, helping to grab newspaper headlines.

But scientists in the United States say a "far more likely explanation" is that the 18,000-year-old remains were of a modern human with the genetic condition micro- cephaly, which reduces the size of the brain and often results in short stature. The condition can also lead to cerebral palsy, epilepsy, impaired sight and hearing, and autism.

The idea of a species of "hobbits" was appealing, partly because island environments can result in the evolution of small versions of various species due to reduced food supplies and fewer predators.

The researchers behind this theory suggested that Homo floresiensis was a descendant of Homo erectus, who lived about 1.8 million years ago.

However, writing in the magazine Science, a team led by Dr Robert Martin, of the Field Museum in Chicago, said that, while selective breeding had reduced the size of some mammals, it had always done so within certain parameters.

Body size could shrink considerably, but the reduction in the size of the brain was always less marked and the hobbit's brain was too small to follow what appeared to be a universal law.

The skeleton was also found alongside sophisticated stone tools that have been associated with modern humans, rather than Homo erectus or any other kind of early hominid.
Posted by:ryuge

#13  Chuck S. roumor has it that it was made while all the little people were available from the Wizard of Oz. Like urban myth.
Posted by: 6   2006-05-19 16:13  

#12  Phil you seem unable to get a joke or copy/paste my name. What gives?
Posted by: rjschwarz   2006-05-19 14:16  

#11  The movie in the pic is, in fact, one of the funniest movies ever made.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2006-05-19 13:15  

#10  rjschwartz:

You seem to believe the microencephaly proponents should have the right to argument from authority but the scientists who discovered the bones shouldn't.
Posted by: Phil   2006-05-19 12:21  

#9  First they tell us Hobbits aren't real, next they'll be spreading nonsense that the DeVinci code is fiction as well. Man, these scientists.

At least we can all fall back on Hogwarts.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2006-05-19 10:42  

#8  Scientists dont exist.

Now Im taking my hairy feet over to the Green Dragon, and having a beer.
Posted by: Meriadoc Brandybuck   2006-05-19 10:19  

#7  They advanced this argument a while back, again, with little or no evidence, using the opinion that they just didn't think it was possible.

"It can't be an orange because it doesn't look like an apple, so it must be a really defective apple."
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-05-19 09:57  

#6  Hobbits and Elves and Orcs, Oh my!
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-05-19 09:54  

#5  I forget. When were midgets invented?
Posted by: Fred   2006-05-19 09:37  

#4  I believe multiple sets of remains have been found, which makes the microcephaly argument seem less likely. It's been a while since I read up on this, though.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2006-05-19 08:24  

#3  "Smeagol hates hobbitssessss."
Posted by: Mike   2006-05-19 06:54  

#2  If hobbits didn't exist, then, how could all that stuff in the lord of the rings happen? Hummm... answer that, you dimwitted "scientists"!
Posted by: anonymous5089   2006-05-19 03:36  

#1  Meanwhile, at LIVESCIENCE.com, scientists believe that early humans may had mated wid their chimpanzee/ape relations.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-05-19 02:03  

00:00