You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Great White North
Environmentalists say Canada undermines Kyoto
2006-05-22
The European Union urged Canada to respect goals for slowing global warming under the U.N.'s Kyoto Protocol on Monday as environmentalists accused Ottawa of seeking to scupper the pact.

Canada, the president of May 15-26 U.N. climate talks in Bonn, has said it cannot meet a legally binding target to cut emissions of heat-trapping gases by 2012 and that it will only take part in an extension if all nations agree.

"What I expect is that the Canadians will honor their commitments," EU Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas told reporters in Brussels.

"The Canadian government of (Prime Minister) Stephen Harper is trying to sabotage 15 years of international efforts to address climate change," the Climate Action Network, grouping environmentalists, said in a statement.

Canada's new Conservative government says it has inherited an economy where emissions of greenhouse gases, mainly carbon dioxide from factories, power plants and cars, have already soared 35 percent above 1990 levels.

And Canadian Environment Minister Rona Ambrose said on Sunday that Canada would take on new commitments to cut emissions, mainly from burning fossil fuels, beyond 2012 only if there were a broad international consensus.

"If it includes all of our international partners, Canada will be at the table," she said, adding that any agreement might be part of Kyoto or outside the pact. The United States, the world's biggest source of emissions, is outside Kyoto.

"We are ready to work with the international community on this issue," Ambrose told CTV television in an interview. Canada accounts for 3.3 percent of emissions by industrialized nations, roughly level with Italy on 3.1 and above France on 2.7 percent.

RISING SEAS

Negotiators from 163 nations are meeting in Bonn for talks on ways to extend Kyoto beyond 2012 to help prevent what could be wrenching climate changes such as more heat waves, droughts, floods and rising sea levels.

On Saturday, Canadian newspapers reported that Ottawa had instructed Canadian negotiators saying that: "Canada will not support agreement on language in the work program that commits developed countries to more stringent targets in the future."
More...
Posted by:tipper

#9  Well, some has to be first in per-capita consumption. We all can't be last, eh?
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2006-05-22 23:11  

#8  I agree. Canadians are wasting energy. Put on a sweater and send it south, where it will do more good.
Posted by: ed   2006-05-22 20:39  

#7  Facts the media never tells you: number 4562

Canada is the biggest* per capita consumer of energy on the planet, by quite a large margin. Under Kyoto they have pulled even further ahead.

* Excepting a couple of Gulf statelets and Singapore which has a very high concentration of energy intensive industries. Link

And note that nobody seems to care about this. All they care about is 'respecting Kyoto'. Further proof that Kyoto has nothing to do with the climate and everything to do with tranzi politics.
Posted by: phil_b   2006-05-22 20:34  

#6  Canada is critical leverage for the argument that teh US is out of step with their allies/neighbors. Stick a fork in Kyoto, it's done. Even Blowhard Al can't revive it with his ridiculous "it could happen" movie
Posted by: Frank G   2006-05-22 19:54  

#5  No, dipshits - Kyoto undermines Canada.

Dammit, I coulda said that.
Posted by: 6   2006-05-22 18:36  

#4  "Environmentalists say Canada undermines Kyoto"

No, dipshits - Kyoto undermines Canada.

Can't you all get even one thing right?

Why do I even ask....
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2006-05-22 17:16  

#3  Harper inherited this time bomb. He should withdraw / disavow it to save Canada.
Posted by: random styling   2006-05-22 17:02  

#2  They appear to be upset that their little economy-bomb might hit the wrong target.
Posted by: mojo   2006-05-22 16:55  

#1  Well of course they do NOW. They are governed by the Conservatives. It was all good right up until about a year ago, though. No problems to report back then. They all started right when Harper took over.
Posted by: eLarson   2006-05-22 14:38  

00:00