You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
More than 60 kidlings have been held at Gitmo
2006-05-28
LONDON - More than 60 minors, some as young as 14, have been held as prisoners at the US detention facility for suspected terrorists at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, a London-based human rights group claimed in a report published on Sunday. Those detainees were under 18 when they were captured by US forces, and at least 10 of them still being held at Guantanamo were 14 or 15 when they were seized, held in solitary confinement, subject to repeated interrogation and allegedly tortured, the charity Reprieve was reported as saying.
Reprieve, which couldn't find child abuse in the Sudan, Mauritania or Saddam's Iraq, and can't be bothered with the execution of minors in Iran, nevertheless found the time to complain about Gitmo.
Britain’s Independent on Sunday (IoS), which carried the allegations, suggested the charges could threaten the United States’ relationship with its closest ally in the “war on terror”, Britain. “We would take a very, very dim view if it transpires that there were actually minors there,” it quoted a British government official as saying.
An unnamed source, to be followed by more unnamed sources.
Unnamed government sources said the allegations directly contradicted WashingtonÂ’s assurances to London that no minors were held at Guantanamo.

Reprieve’s legal director and a lawyer for a number of detainees, Clive Stafford-Smith, told the newspaper the United States could have broken not only its own laws but all human rights conventions by putting children in adult jails. “There is nothing wrong with trying minors for crimes, if they have committed crimes,” he said.
These weren't crimes, these were youts of 16 and 17 with rifles in their hands.
“The problem is when you either hold minors without trial in shocking conditions, or try them before a military commission that, in the words of a prosecutor who refused to take part, is rigged.”
The 'shocking conditions' are better than any Brit prison, I'll wager.
Stafford-Smith said that even if it were proved the 10 still held there-- who are now all thought to have turned 18 -- were involved in fighting, they should be treated differently from adults.
'cause it's completely different if a 16 year old shoots you, everybody knows that.
According to the newspaper, Washington has admitted that only three Guantanamo inmates -- later freed -- were ever treated as children. The US military also admitted that 17 of those on the first definitive list of detainees released earlier this month were under 18 when they were captured, it added.

But Stafford-Smith said Reprieve had "someone's say-so" “credible evidence” from other detainees, lawyers and the International Red Cross that an additional 37 juveniles were under 18 when they were taken to Cuba. A US Pentagon spokesman quoted by the newspaper said no one now being held at Guantanamo was a juvenile and rejected arguments that normal criminal law applied to the facility.
Posted by:Steve White

#5  It's this kind of bullshit that gets good people killed. We've seen youths as young as eight or nine holding and using weapons, acting as suicide bombers, and doing other combat-related activities in Vietnam, Cambodia, Burma, India, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Iraq, Israel, Lebanon, Sudan, Kenya, and Somalia. An armed terrorist is an armed terrorist, regardless of their age. This British group should all get a rifle-butt square in their teeth, so they'll actually do some THINKING before they open their yaps again.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2006-05-28 15:13  

#4  What did British soldiers do when they found them fighting against Hitler Youth?
Posted by: Penguin   2006-05-28 13:12  

#3  British morons.
Posted by: Steve White   2006-05-28 11:33  

#2  What sort of moron would pass a burgler protection bill?
Posted by: 3dc   2006-05-28 08:41  

#1  But in Britain, you are expected not to disturb burglars in the process of relieving you of your possessions, and certainly not do them any physical harm, which could open you to a lawsuit or prosecution.
Posted by: Perfesser   2006-05-28 07:13  

00:00