You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine-Jordan
DEBKA speculates, Salt futures rise
2006-06-02
Al Qaeda terror attacks in S. Israel and central Damascus and ZarqawiÂ’s outburst against Shiites and Hizballah are part and parcel of same offensive. DEBKAfileÂ’s al Qaeda experts see the events of the last 24 hours as segments of the same broad-based strategic initiative. In Beirut, the anti-Syrian Lebanese government coalition, working with the UN, the United States, France and Israel, have made no progress in getting the Lebanese Shiite Hizballah terror group and its 15-20,000-strong militia to disarm.

Thursday night, June 1, this coalition found support in a most improbable quarter: al QaedaÂ’s Iraq commander, Abu Musab al Zarqawi.

In a three-part audiotape over the Internet, Zarqawi said that as long as Shiites whom he calls “wolves in sheep’s clothing.” are not finished off, “true Islam will not prevail.” Calling on fellow Sunnis in Iraq to reject reconciliation and national unity as a weapon of surrender, the speaker blasted Iraq’s Shiite leader Ayatollah Ali Sistani as the leader of “infidelity and atheism.” Zarqawi also attacked the Mahdi Army militia led by radical Shiite cleric Moqtada Sadr for giving up the fight against US forces.

But where the al Qaeda broke new ground was in his attack on Hizballah whose deployment along the Lebanese-Israel frontier, he claimed, interferes with Sunni (al Qaeda) plans to strike Israel from there. The pledges of aid to the Palestinians given by HizballahÂ’s head, Hassan Nasrallah were castigated as empty talk.

DEBKAfileÂ’s al Qaeda experts link this peroration to al QaedaÂ’s operations against the multinational force in Sinai, on May 31, and the apparently coordinated strikes on an Israeli patrol in the Negev and key buildings in central Damascus of June 2.

For one, ZarqawiÂ’s followers were willing to take on the IDF in a head-on clash; for the second, to strike at the most sensitive installations in central Damascus. The two attacks are evidence of his mounting confidence in the operational capabilities of al QaedaÂ’s Middle East networks outside as well as inside Iraq. Hizballah is now investigating the suspicion that the murder of Mahmoud Majzub and his brother Nidal in Sidon, South Lebanon, on May 26 - for which the Israeli Mossad was blamed - was the work of a Zarqawi cell as a prelude to his broadside against Shiites and the Hizballah in particular.

Majzub, according to DEBKAfileÂ’s counter-terror sources, was HizballahÂ’s senior liaison man with the Palestinian controllers who run suicide bombers from the West Bank against Israeli targets.

ZaraqawisÂ’ vicious anti-Shiite rhetoric does not mean that the al Qaeda leader has withdrawn from collaborative projects with Shiite Iran and the Hizballah when their aims converge. Ideological differences do not interfere with the practical goals shared by the three terrorist elements.
Posted by:Steve

#2  Starting to feel like the real war is the Shia versus the Sunni - we're just pawns in this game. The battle for which sect gets to take over the world with their grand khalifate.

Al Q for the Sunni side and Mahmoud for the Shiite. This is their battle for supremacy and it seems whoever slaughters more infidels gets to lead the game.

Pawns - because we're next, after the blood drains away and either Sunni or Shia sects win. Just pieces in the game for bragging rights 'til their internal slaughter is done. Best if the we just run away until they're ready to come get.

Gotta a lotta killing of muslims to do first - but it's fun to kill and show us what's coming.

So many levels in this one. never been a war quite like it. MSM keeps having to dig for images and comparison from unrelated wars past instead of analysing and thinking and gathering facts and putting 2 + 2 together correctly. But, then, they weren't trained to write investigative journalism or analyse - just how to spin an (often uniformed) opinion into sales dollars and look pretty on camera. Facts is reporting -opinions are not.

We're being used. Proxy war.
Posted by: Thinemp Whimble2412   2006-06-02 19:58  

#1  
alt for that poor child in the rain.
Posted by: 6   2006-06-02 10:08  

00:00