You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Sikhs demand separate nation in NW India
2006-06-07
AMRITSAR - Hundreds of young Sikhs on Tuesday demanded a separate nation for their community as they observed the 22nd anniversary of the Indian army storming the religionÂ’s holiest shrine to drive out Sikh militants.

The rare chant of “Long Live Khalistan” - the proposed name of their would-be state - was heard in an around the Golden Temple, Sikhism’s holiest shrine, after some 400 young Sikhs took part in prayers to mark the anniversary Tuesday.

The raid on the temple came in 1984 as an insurgency for an independent Sikh state was festering, with armed militants launching attacks in India’s Punjab to press their demands for the establishment of Khalistan, or “Land of the Pure” in the Punjabi language. The attack enraged Sikhs and led to the assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi a few months later - an act that provoked anti-Sikh riots across much of northern India. The riots, in turn, further fueled the insurgency. Before it was brutally crushed in the late 1980s, the rebellion eventually cost more than 18,000 lives - including 329 people killed in an Air India jetliner explosion over the Atlantic Ocean blamed on Canadian-based Sikhs.

Since then, calls for a separate Sikh state have all but disappeared, except among the most fervent of the Sikhs - a minority religion that makes up about 2 percent of IndiaÂ’s 1 billion people.
Posted by:Steve White

#11  This is one "stan" that will never be born... India will not accept another partition.

The response to the assasination of Indira Gandhi by her Sikh bodyguards was quite vicious. Thousands of Sikhs were killed by enraged hindu mobs.
Rajiv Gandhi dryly commented that when an elephant falls, a lot of trees get crushed.

Posted by: john   2006-06-07 15:46  

#10  Oh great, another -stan to remember. I can't even keep up with all the new ones that came out of the Soviet Union collapse.

- Geography B. Hard
Posted by: Xbalanke   2006-06-07 15:40  

#9  Gill may just decide to resume his activities... all these "khalastanis" will just disappear one night
Posted by: john   2006-06-07 15:38  

#8  These jokers need to send a request to

(a) Manmohan Singh, the Prime Minister of India (a Sikh)

(b) General JJ Singh, the Chief of Staff of the Indian Army (a Sihk)

(c)Montek Singh Ahluwalia, the head of the planning commision of India, the most powerful civil servant in India. (a Sikh)

(d) KPS Gill, who is heading counter insurgency police operations in some maoist infested areas. (yet another Sikh)

They need to pay special attention to Gill, who as police chief of the Punjab, ruthlessly crushed the last insurrection.

Posted by: john   2006-06-07 15:34  

#7  In any neck of the woods... except maybe France.
Posted by: sludge   2006-06-07 13:31  

#6  Pride will never let the above happen though. Pride and shame are powerful things, especially in that neck of the woods.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2006-06-07 12:04  

#5  Some Sikh have sought independence for decades. There was an Air India flight out of Canada blown up by Sikh terrorists back in the 80s. Before I went to India in the 90s I waded through a line of Free Khalistan protestors outside the Indian Embassy in San Francisco. I have no idea how much of the population of Sikhs agree with this line of thought though.

ASSUMING that a majority of Sikhs do want independence I'd suggest India make a bold move and give it to them (along with Kashmir) to create an independent buffer state that would (a) love India (b) result in the collapse of Pakistan as the Pakistani portion of Punjab got real agro about joining Free Khalistan.

The move could be slow and managed to prevent other provinces from getting crazy ideas but having a secure, peaceful border between hostile nuclear powers would do wonders for Indias economy, investment, and growth.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2006-06-07 12:04  

#4  ...This ain't good - Sikhs as a rule are a tough, honest people who don't fight without good reason. If they are to the point where they feel that put upon, it's bad for India.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2006-06-07 06:51  

#3  kalistan=land of the pure in punjabi////pakistan=land of the pure in uhdu--all these swarthy greasy muthafuckers want to be pure--what's up with that?
Posted by: yo momma   2006-06-07 02:19  

#2  Sikh and ye shall find
Posted by: Captain America   2006-06-07 01:12  

#1  Sihks are not good to mess with. Their religion is a militant one, roughly a cross between Hinduism and Islam. They are very straightforward about their militancy, and make superb soldiers in whatever army they serve, as discipline and respect for authority are also religious value for them. They are a large part of the officer and NCO corps of the Indian Army.

In the civilian world they are firm believers in entrepreneurship and business, and are usually middle class or better.

Sihk separatists usually only agitate when they have as a religion been oppressed by either the Hindus or the Moslems. It is to their credit that they are far more interested in being left alone then to rule over, dominate and oppress others.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-06-07 00:56  

00:00