You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Pakistani Confesses, Then Is Shot Dead
2006-06-20
LAHORE, Pakistan (AP) -- A Pakistan man killed his three young daughters Tuesday before confessing to police, prompting one officer to shoot him dead, an investigator said. Mohammed Ashraf, 38, used a knife to cut the throats of his daughters aged 3, 5 and 9 before dawn in the eastern city of Lahore, said senior police investigator Amir Zulifquar. Ashraf then went to a police station to report his crime, and was charged with murdering his daughters and placed in a cell.

"As I left the police station after questioning Mohammed Ashraf, one of my guards opened fire and killed him," Zulifquar said.
I'd buy him a beer, but he'd most likely refuse.
The policeman who shot Ashraf was identified as Mohammed Nadeem and was taken into custody, Zulifquar said. Nadeem told investigators that he killed Ashraf to "eliminate an animal from society," according to Zulifquar. "A person who kills innocent children deserves no mercy," Zulifquar quoted Nadeem as saying.
I like this guy
Before his killing, Ashraf told police that he was jobless and had killed his daughters because of poverty, Zulifquar said. Ashraf's wife Sughran Bibi told reporters that she didn't hear her daughters' cries and that her husband had woken her up after "committing the heinous crime for which I will never forgive him."

Nadeem, the policeman, will face court for a ruling on whether he should be charged with murder or not, Zulifquar said. No date has been set for when he will appear in court. If convicted, he faces the death penalty.
Posted by:Steve

#4  Cost-effective justice has worked before.

Posted by: doc   2006-06-20 17:35  

#3  It will be interesting to see if this gets much play in the Pakistan media. That is, will there be cries that the officer was right, and that murdering children is a horrible crime; or will he be roundly damned for interfering with the father trying to restore his "family honor."
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-06-20 14:31  

#2  But they knew this... the Moguls had courts, as did the British Raj. It was never permissible for "police" (whatever they were called) to summarily kill someone.

When the British left, there was a legacy of English jurisprudence and independent courts, a working civil administration, efficient police, a non-political army obedient to the civil administration.

Posted by: john   2006-06-20 14:27  

#1  bad cases make bad law.

And Pakiland has enough bad law.

If they dont learn to put even scum of the earth on trial in a court of law, theyre gonna remain pakiwakiland forever.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2006-06-20 13:39  

00:00