| Submit your comments on this article |
| Science & Technology |
| Advancing Missle Defense |
| 2006-06-21 |
| Amid evidence indicating that the Stalinist North Korean regime may have completed the fueling of its most advanced long-range missile, the Taepodong-2, an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) whose range could place our West Coast in jeopardy, the Pentagon recently activated its new ground-based interceptor-missile defense system. Bill Gertz, national-security and intelligence correspondent for The Washington Times, reported yesterday that the Pentagon switched the U.S. anti-ballistic missile (ABM) defense system from test to operational mode. The current ABM system features 11 long-range, ground-based interceptor missiles. Nine are based at Fort Greely in Alaska and two are deployed at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. Each of the interceptors can launch an exoatmospheric kill vehicle capable of intercepting a warhead traveling more than 15,000 mph in the midcourse phase of an ICBM's trajectory. Lasting about 20 minutes, the midcourse phase of an ICBM follows the three-to-five -minute boost phase, which is the ideal time to destroy any ballistic missile -- i.e., before the missile warhead can achieve the velocity necessary to reach its target. Unfortunately, the United States currently has no capability of destroying an ICBM in its boost phase, in part because the eight-year Clinton administration had so little interest pursuing missile defense. In fact, presidential funding requests for missile defense steadily declined from an average of $5.3 billion (fiscal years 1992 and 1993) to $2.6 billion in 1998, when the Rumsfeld commission alerted the nation to the ballistic-missile threat posed by North Korea and other rogue states. Indeed, North Korea launched an earlier version of the Taepodong missile, which flew over Japan, the month after the Rumsfeld commission issued its report. |
| Posted by:Captain America |
| #3 Not only that, but surely it's not *fair* that America can defend itself so effecively. Other countries just don't have a chance! Selfish bullies. |
| Posted by: Seafarious 2006-06-21 10:05 |
| #2 I am afraid Dan is right. |
| Posted by: 3dc 2006-06-21 10:02 |
| #1 "If and when the world observes in action the strategic U.S. advances in missile defense, the United States should have a much stronger case to make to European, Mideastern and Asian nations to support U.S. diplomatic initiatives against rogue and other hostile states." Unfortunately the opposite is likely to be true. Once we have a demonstrated capability for defense the dhimmis will assume it is ok for others to have missiles and nukes since we can protect them all. |
| Posted by: DanNY 2006-06-21 09:10 |