You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
U.S. Nixes N. Korea Bid for Missile Talks
2006-06-22
North Korea called Wednesday for direct talks with the United States over a potential missile test, but the Bush administration rejected the overture, saying threats aren't the way to seek dialogue. "You don't normally engage in conversations by threatening to launch intercontinental ballistic missiles," U.N. Ambassador John Bolton said. "It's not a way to produce a conversation because if you acquiesce in aberrant behavior you simply encourage the repetition of it, which we're obviously not going to do."

President Bush, meeting with European leaders in Austria, said North Korea faced further isolation if it went ahead with any launch. "It should make people nervous when non-transparent regimes who have announced they have nuclear warheads, fire missiles," Bush said. "This is not the way you conduct business in the world."
Posted by:Fred

#2  Unless the Nork missile is shot down, the US will know that the Norks will have quantified and qualified telemetry based on... A) how much fuel to weight has been loaded into the missile (and the Norks won't tell),...B) how much 'trueing' their guidance system will take for subsequent 'tests' and C) helpful intel for the Chicoms on the early warning and tracking signals spiked by the US on it's path!! I believe the Norks may introduce 'veering' into the trajectory for added intel insights; however in any case, should the trajectory not be descending before Hawaiian air space perimeter breachment, anything less than a hightened elevation to the next "DEF-Con" level would be highly irresponsible for the US's Strategic Defense response if not shot down!!
Posted by: smn   2006-06-22 02:09  

#1  That's a big Foxtrot Yankee, folks.
Posted by: mojo   2006-06-22 01:27  

00:00