You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Olde Tyme Religion
Truth should be more important than unity
2006-06-26
By Michael Nazir-Ali, Bishop of Rochester
In many ways, the United States is a study in contrasts. It is full of clashing colours and jangling messages. Socially and politically, it is very divided. The "neocons" have clear views on everything from Iraq to abortion, and the "progressives" have the opposite - but also equally clear - opinions on such matters. We would expect, then, to find these divisions reflected in broadly-based organisations such as the Churches and we would not be wrong. All of the so-called "mainline" Churches have this fault-line running through them.
It's a faultline that seems to separate the clergy from the laity, in many cases. Across the board, it separates the congregations making up the National Council of Churches from the evangelicals, and churches with growing memberships from those without.
Why, then, should I have been shocked on entering the Greater Columbus Convention Centre in Ohio, where the General Convention of the Episcopal Church (the Anglican Church in the USA) was being held? Should I not have expected tension, difference and debate? There was, first of all, culture shock. It felt to me like a trendy exhibition put together by some ultra-politically-correct organisation, with all the favourite causes of the fashionable prominent. There was, however, a more profound reason for feeling uncomfortable: it became plain quite quickly that this was not a conflict merely of styles, attitudes or even opinions but of two quite different views of religion.
I think that smug political correctitude might have something to do with the declining memberships, but let Bishop Nazir-Ali explain it:
One tendency that was informing the culture of the convention, in a major way, was to do with the diffuse religiosity of the present-day West. Such religiosity, in my view, has much in common with New Age ideas, vague as these often are, such as nature mysticism, or a sense of oneness with the world around, and pantheism, the belief that everything is divine: God is identified with Mother Nature and also with our own souls. Jesus then becomes just a special example of a god-self. Such a world-view is likely to be optimistic, inclusive and non-judgmental. It regards the world and the people in it as more or less as God intended them to be. Such people should be accepted as they are and, if they wish to be, fully included in the life of the Church without further question.
We can all be friends, and it doesn't take any effort to be good. Evil is, depending on the circumstances, either misunderstood good, or it's something like pooping — not to be watched or discussed...
My natural friends in ECUSA, however, are those who want to hold on to the historic, Biblical and catholic faith as it has been received through the ages and in every part of the world.
Posted by:Fred

#2  FREEREPUBLIC.com and other websites are reporting that Spain's first homosexual married couple are planning to divorce. This case could well be a test on national and international laws, protocols, or methodisms regarding the division of Gay-Lesbian properties and assets post-Marriage. IMO the litmus test remains the issue of children - if adult homosexuals want the sanctity of marriage, they cannot deny any personal responsibility, i.e. un-adopt or be non/un-related, to any child just becuz their relationship ends. They gotta support the kid(s) whether they are biologically related or not.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-06-26 22:06  

#1  Even if all are marching toward God, it's pretty obvious that some are walking, some shuffling, some meandering from one side of the road to the other, some goose-stepping, some fox-trotting, and not a few actually standing and staring at the parade, rather than participating.

Crickey, Fred, that's some great commentary. The above was absolutely priceless, and I'm a devout agnostic.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-06-26 19:52  

00:00