You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Lugar Wants Direct Talks With Pyongyang Before Missile Test Crisis
2006-06-26
A leading Republican senator suggested Sunday that the Bush administration should talk directly with North Korea as concerns grow over a possible test launch of a missile that could reach the United States. On CBS' Face The Nation, Sen. Richard Lugar, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said the U.S. should not attack the missile while it is on the ground, before it is fired, as some have urged. "It would be advisable to bring about a much greater degree of diplomacy, and this may involve direct talks between the United States and North Korea," he told Bob Schieffer.
Where the North can rant and rave and cast spittle about, and where the U.S. will be required to concede and acquiese in order 'to keep talks on track'. And everytime we're tempted to walk away we'll be likened to ogres, meanies and not-very-nice guys -- that'll be by the NYT, the KCNA will be kinder.
North Korea long has wanted direct meetings with the U.S. Washington, however, has refused, insisting it will only meet the North Koreas in the context of six-nation international talks aimed at ridding the communist country of its nuclear weapons program. Lugar, R-Ind., said he respected those talks, which are stalled now, but "nevertheless, with regard to a missile that might have a range of the United States, that becomes a very specific United States-North Korean issue."

"We're going to have to come to a point where we find at least an agenda to talk with North Korea about, and I think we are moving toward that," Lugar said on CBS.

Sen. Barbara Boxer – who also appeared on Face The Nation – said no options should be taken off the table, but urged the president to continue with multi-party talks. "The kind of diplomacy that we engaged in at first was very tentative, got stronger, got better, got wiser," the California Democrat said. "I say you never take any option off the table, but I think if we can continue to get those countries that North Korea listens to, to keep up the pressure – that is Russia, that is China – we could avoid a serious escalation of this whole matter."
Posted by:Fred

#12  Sure, Richard. Hop on the plane.
Posted by: grb   2006-06-26 23:30  

#11  You know the Left > the world would be a safer place iff everyone had missles and nukes, ergo America is the only one that must give up its missles and nukes to OWG, besides our sovereignty, freedoms, rights, control of our own Govt, and endowments, etal. Free America = Socialist-Commie Amerikkka is not paying the Norkies enuff $$$ to leave America-West alone, nor is America = Amerikkka dev the expensive hi-techs in order to give to the Norkies free so that the Norkies can use against America. D *** it all, "America must be constrained/restrained and controlled and under OWG" as long as the Lefties are NOT held responsible or blamed for anything.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-06-26 22:29  

#10  Woof! Woof! Woof!.... dang Hatfield. what's up old dawg? Why you barking at 8814? You think? Could be buddy-dawg. Hope so.
Posted by: 6   2006-06-26 17:17  

#9  Yep. Only a peripheral concern to the US. Cut off funding and aid sources. If China and SKor want to fund them, then raise tariffs and move US troops south, eventually past Pusan.
Posted by: ed   2006-06-26 14:48  

#8  There's a reason they call him Dickless
Posted by: Captain America   2006-06-26 14:45  

#7  I agree with the Prez on this. It doesn't just concern us, it has a lot more to do with SKor, China, Japan and Russia than just us. They are trying to be clever, but in a battle of witts they are unarmed.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-06-26 14:05  

#6  That sounds dreadfully unilateral.
Posted by: Seafarious   2006-06-26 12:06  

#5  We can avoid and serious escalation of the matter.” Well Babs I would say when they broke the Non-nuke treaty, fired a couple missiles, and now are fueling another that the escalation is ENTIRLEY on their part. Frigging moonbat! If Babs was in Congress on Dec 8, 1941 she would call for talks with Japan to see what we did to anger them.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2006-06-26 11:58  

#4  There's a reason they call him "Dick."
Posted by: mojo   2006-06-26 10:11  

#3  Dementia
Posted by: Captain America   2006-06-26 08:54  

#2  Somone tell this old DICK its far too late - the crisis is already here. Thanks to the bunch who wanted to talk LAST TIME, aka Jimmy Carter.

Sheesh, when even Barbara Boxer is right about not pullingoptions off the table, you KNOW you're in trouble.

Lugar. Hagel. Chafee. McCain. Graham. Specter. and the spinless Frist.

Somone tell me again why a republican Majority was supposed to mean anything in the senate?
Posted by: Oldspook   2006-06-26 03:36  

#1  Lugar. Lol. Leading - as in returned to DC so many times he gets to sit in the highchair, sport Depends, and swill Ensure - but no one with two neurons would follow him anywhere. I recall he's the big US advocate for Sea Law changes that are demonstrably idiotic. Other than that, a terrible position on a very important future issue, he's done nothing in the last 3 or 4 years worth noting. Senile buffoon.

Boxer. ROFL. ROFLMAO. Has never, ever, said anything worth noting, much less implementing. To imply she grasps the import of anything involving North Korea is a laugh. Doesn't get any worse than Boxy the Bonehead.

Neither has a clue. Face-time. Sound bite. Rub / Pull.

The way Bush has dealt with Kimmie has been as good as it could get, given what was dumped in his lap. Any suggestions, criticisms, or even agreement from either are irrelevant. Merely shows how desperate the FTN producers are these days. Russert's leftovers, lol.
Posted by: Ebbealing Snerert8814   2006-06-26 00:43  

00:00