You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa North
Mauritania gets taste of freedom, democracy from unlikely source: A military junta
2006-06-28
A government critic once hid his children upstairs each time the doorbell rang, fearful they would see him being hauled away by state security agents. Now that critic sees reason for hope in unlikely advocates of democracy: Leaders of a military junta that seized power in Mauritania last year. On the weekend, the junta held a constitutional referendum in which voters overwhelmingly adopted changes ensuring future heads of state will never again be able to stay in office for life.

Similar pledges to restore civilian rule have rung hollow in the wake of other African coups, but Mauritania's junta leaders appear to be following through. The constitutional amendments, which authorities announced Monday had been approved, limit future heads of state to two five-year terms in office — no small feat in a coup-prone country that has never seen power change hands via the ballot box. Interior Minister Mohamed Ahmed Ould Mohamed Lemine announced Monday that final results showed nearly 97 per cent of voters had adopted the changes. The constitutional court must confirm them before they can become law. Turnout was more than 76 per cent, Lemine said. About 980,000 of Mauritania's nearly three million people were registered to vote.

"Mauritania has changed for good, there is no going back," said the government critic, 46-year-old journalist Mohamed Fall Ould Oumeir, who was jailed four times under the former regime and had entire editions of his weekly Tribune newspaper repeatedly seized.
Posted by:Fred

#5  #1: Is this guy f*cking nuts?
Military Juntas dont have the best track record for their "Blessings of Liberty".
They may start off playing the nice guy. But in the end the only way they can end up is like Burma.

UUMMMM, Like George Washington?
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2006-06-28 23:43  

#4  Zia al-Haq, Pinochet, Jaruzelski, Argie generals

I haven't done any numbers, and I'm not saying the numbers are astronomically high, but it seems to me there is a better chance of moving to democracy from an authoritarian military government than a civilian dictatorship.

Military leaders don't have a perfect record by any stretch of the imagination, but they can be patriotically motivated as opposed to the craven power hunger that seems to dominate civilian dictators. Part of it may also be that they know their brother officers will protect them from the repercussions after the transfer.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-06-28 18:07  

#3  Military Juntas dont have the best track record for their "Blessings of Liberty".

See, Portugal for an example of the opposite. For examples of military men who keep or restore democracy see also George Washington and de Gaulle (a bastard in many things but who had more genuine respect for democracy than any of his successors: unlike Chirac he resigned when he lost a referendum).
Posted by: JFM   2006-06-28 17:42  

#2  Weeelllll BJ I'm kinda sorta thinkin' that maybe this could really happen.

There have been Military men who have established a gov't and then left the stage (see Turkey). Damn few I'll grant, but it could happen... I'm more concerned with Interior Ministers named Mohamed in a mostly Arab state.


Posted by: AlanC   2006-06-28 09:18  

#1  Is this guy f*cking nuts?
Military Juntas dont have the best track record for their "Blessings of Liberty".
They may start off playing the nice guy. But in the end the only way they can end up is like Burma.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-06-28 08:57  

00:00