You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Realities & Necessities
2006-06-28
ItÂ’s time to approve the India nuclear deal.

By William R. Hawkins

On March 2, while the President Bush was visiting New Delhi, he and Prime Minister Singh signed an agreement on civilian nuclear cooperation. The agreement requires congressional action to implement, however, and little has been done to move this process forward. Later today, the House International Relations Committee is scheduled to mark up H.R. 4974, a bill to authorize the president to waive the application of certain requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 with respect to India, but floor action in the House and favorable actions of any kind in the Senate are a question mark.

On June 22, Vice President Dick Cheney tried to get the ball rolling with a speech to the U.S.-India Business Council in which he called the agreement “one of the most important strategic foreign-policy initiatives of our government.” He stressed that “Today there is a new strategic partnership between our countries — a partnership based on democratic values, common interests, strong commercial ties and a climate of trust and good faith between our governments.”

Yet, in an interview with the London Financial Times earlier in the week, Sen. John McCain said that Congress would probably not act on the measure this year because of the need to “scrutinize the deal rigorously.” Critics fear that lifting restrictions on nuclear cooperation with India, a country that has developed nuclear weapons without signing the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, would set a bad precedent at a time when the United States is trying to rally international opinion against the nuclear ambitions of Iran and North Korea.
Posted by:john

#7  China would probably second choice.

Count me as well, lets let them finish what Chiang Kai-Shek began.
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-06-28 20:47  

#6  Is there a sign-up sheet?
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-06-28 20:46  

#5  I'm in
Posted by: Frank G   2006-06-28 20:45  

#4  If India starts threating to annihilate countries I'd likely agree with their choice.

Seeing as how their first choice would most likely be Pakistan, I'll go ahead and toss my hat in the ring with you, 6.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-06-28 20:14  

#3  If India starts threating to annihilate countries I'd likely agree with their choice.
Posted by: 6   2006-06-28 11:27  

#2  Yeah, big difference between India and Iran.
So that argument doesn't hold water. India doesn't go around threatening to annihilate other countries and use terror to bend its neighbors to their will.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-06-28 09:58  

#1  Excellent article. It boils down who can you trust more to abide by agreements and act responsibly, clearly the answer is India (rather than China).
Posted by: phil_b   2006-06-28 07:00  

00:00