You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
50 Nobel Laureates With Zero Credibility
2006-07-06
July 6, 2000


President William Jefferson Clinton
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20502


Dear Mr. President:

We urge you not to make the decision to deploy an anti-ballistic missile system during the remaining months of your administration. The system would offer little protection and would do grave harm to this nation's core security interests.

We and other independent scientists have long argued that anti-ballistic missile systems, particularly those attempting to intercept reentry vehicles in space, will inevitably lose in an arms race of improvements to offensive missiles.

North Korea has taken dramatic steps toward reconciliation with South Korea. Other dangerous states will arise. But what would such a state gain by attacking the United States except its own destruction?

While the benefits of the proposed anti-ballistic missile system are dubious, the dangers created by a decision to deploy are clear. It would be difficult to persuade Russia or China that the United States is wasting tens of billions of dollars on an ineffective missile system against small states that are unlikely to launch a missile attack on the U.S. The Russians and Chinese must therefore conclude that the presently planned system is a stage in developing a bigger system directed against

them. They may respond by restarting an arms race in ballistic missiles and having missiles in a dangerous "launch-on-warning" mode.

Even if the next planned test of the proposed anti-ballistic missile system works as planned, any movement toward deployment would be premature, wasteful and dangerous.

Respectfully,...

(Follows is a list of the Nobel Laureates who signed this ill-advised letter.)
I encourage the reposting of this letter with the attached list of names, so that people can see how even supposed "experts" can have ignorant and foolish notions. No longer should these scientists point with pride to their mistake. Instead they should wear it as a scarlet letter.
Posted by:Anonymoose

#13  "North Korea has taken dramatic steps toward reconciliation with South Korea."
Name one.


Does sending hit teams across the border to kill the South Korean president count? Hmmm...how about blowing up a South Korean commercial airliner full of passengers? Or...killing the South Korean cabinet members visiting another south Asian country? Geez,,,thereÂ’s got to be something in this list.
Posted by: Glavise Gromong7909   2006-07-06 20:21  

#12  Who was it that said: that's so stupid only an intellectual would believe it?
Posted by: Xbalanke   2006-07-06 18:29  

#11  #1 I always figg'rt they were people who answered a question with another question.
Posted by: macofromoc   2006-07-06 17:37  

#10  I concede.
Posted by: Darrell   2006-07-06 15:57  

#9  Darrell

Invasion and attempted incorporation in the 50s!
Posted by: DarthVader   2006-07-06 15:25  

#8  "North Korea has taken dramatic steps toward reconciliation with South Korea."
Name one.
Posted by: Darrell   2006-07-06 15:16  

#7  These kinds of things bring out the intellectual snob in me, Swamp Blondie. Of course that's what they think, which is what makes the whole exercise so amusing (or annoying, depending on one's inclination) to those of us with a vague idea of our limitations. ;-)
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-07-06 14:03  

#6  What arrogance to assume that expertise in one field transposes into expertise in all others.

tw, I guess they figured if Chomsky can do it, they can too.
Posted by: Swamp Blondie   2006-07-06 13:35  

#5  Dont forget Arafat - the murdering thug and terrorist - also recevied an Noble peace prize.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2006-07-06 13:31  

#4  I sometimes wonder if they give these things away based on political persuasion matching some kind of pacifist agenda. "Pacifism is honorable, right?" Only if it sticks. President Carter got one of those things, but if he got his way there would be total chaos within a couple generations. How peaceful is that?
Posted by: grb   2006-07-06 13:27  

#3  Highly amusing -- a great many of the signatories won prizes for medicine or chemistry, and one for economics. What arrogance to assume that expertise in one field transposes into expertise in all others. The physicists' work at least can be claimed to be marginally related, but as for the rest...

And History has quickly shown how unkind she plans to be to the poor dears -- only six years of glory before the fall. It would be unkind to point and laugh.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-07-06 13:15  

#2  Dupes, fools, or traitors. Take your pick. Their arguments are, at best, disingenuous and flawed; at worst, they are blatant lies.

I will write to each signatory who hails from my alma mater. Not that it will do any good right now.

Disgusting.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike   2006-07-06 12:41  

#1  I read somewhere recently that an intellectual is someone educated in excess of their natural abilities.
Posted by: usmc6743   2006-07-06 12:05  

00:00