You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
No negotiations on Falklands: UK Foreign Minister
2006-07-10
Britain has written to the United Nations restating its sovereignty over the Falklands, as Argentina escalates attempts to gain international support for its claim over the islands. The Foreign Office has confirmed that ministers contacted the UN after counterparts in Buenos Aires managed to reopen the sovereignty issue.
I thought that was settled finally a few years back?
Officials have also written to the Organisation of American States (OAS), which last month supported talks between Britain and Argentina to solve the "Malvinas Islands" dispute peacefully. At the OAS general assembly in Santo Domingo, capital of the Dominican Republic, the organisation voted to approve an Argentine declaration to "continue exploring all possible means to solve the problem peacefully". The organisation said Argentina and Britain "must begin talks about the sovereignty dispute as soon as possible".
They're making the assumption the problem's not solved because they haven't gotten their way...
Argentine foreign minister Jorge Taiana said his country's president, Nestor Kirchner, pledged that the Argentine people were committed to winning back sovereignty of the islands as soon as possible, and would begin talks in good faith with Britain. He drove the point home during a meeting with UN secretary-general Kofi Annan. He claimed Annan had "agreed to look at" possible solutions to the disagreement." The UN's Special Committee on decolonisation subsequently adopted a draft resolution stating that "a peaceful and negotiated settlement" was the way to resolve the issue.
If the Brits own it, and the inhabitants are Brits, what's to be "peacefully negotiated"?
A Foreign Office source last night confirmed that Britain had officially objected to the resolution, and reiterated its claim over the islands.
"It's ours. Piss off."
We have a recently retired fleet aircraft carrier we could sell the Brits for $1, don't we? At least until they get theirs built.
He added: "It was not a complaint, more a statement of fact - or a restatement of everything we have been saying for decades." Foreign Office minister Geoff Hoon confirmed that the OAS had been subjected to the same no-nonsense treatment. He said: "There can be no negotiations on the sovereignty of the Falkland Islands unless and until such time as the Falkland Islanders so wish. The principle of self-determination underlies the government's position."
Posted by:Seafarious

#10  And yeah, I just like this picture.



To paraphrase Sandy Woodward speaking to the expedition: You've seen fit to take the Queen's pence, now it's time to earn your keep, some of us are going to die, but it'll mostly be them. So get ready.
Posted by: 6   2006-07-10 14:09  

#9  None at all, really. Wouldn't be sporting.
Posted by: 6   2006-07-10 13:58  

#8  Yep, the Argies got anxious and greedy while Thatcher got the Premiership. So they've lost the islands forever.

There's usually 12 several Tornadoes fitted out for maritime attack at Stanley now. The airfield is much, much improved and defended by Rapier Block xx. That and the rotating commando force will keep the islands safe.

There are no UK submarines on constant patrol.
Posted by: 6   2006-07-10 13:57  

#7  If I remember correctly (and the books I read many years ago are to be believe), the UK was in active negotiations to give the Falklands to Argentina back around the '80/'81 time frame. The reason being one of UK citizenship and immigration. Seems the UK .gov was worried about an influx of immigrants after their lease on Hong Kong was up and they were looking to set a precedence regarding citizenship. Sort of reverse-Colonialism.

Give their current immigrant population, I bet they would've been happy with the Chinese instead.

btw, The Battle for the Falklands by Max Hastings & Simon Jenkins is a great book on the subject in my opinion.
Posted by: psychohillbilly   2006-07-10 13:05  

#6  Argentina should have a bunch of people illegally immigrate to the Falklands, have large families, and then when they are the majority, apply the principle of self-determination and demand the islands be given to Argentina.

Ah, La Reconquista del Sur! The southernmost province of Aztlan! Somebody get MEChA on the case!
Posted by: Swamp Blondie   2006-07-10 10:51  

#5  Once you've seen Stanley the Pampas loses its alure.
Posted by: 6   2006-07-10 10:44  

#4  I'm still trying to figure out why anybody WANTS the Falklands. Not a lot of whaling going on there anymore, is there? Does Japan have a dog in this fight?
Posted by: mojo   2006-07-10 10:00  

#3  Dear Argentina,

*BEEP* you.

Yours truely,

UK.
Posted by: DarthVader   2006-07-10 09:43  

#2  Argentina should have a bunch of people illegally immigrate to the Falklands, have large families, and then when they are the majority, apply the principle of self-determination and demand the islands be given to Argentina.
Two problems - 1) finding Argentinans who want to live there, and 2) keeping them loyal to Argentina after a generation or three as Falklanders (only Muslims seem able to do that.)
Posted by: glenmore   2006-07-10 08:14  

#1  Let me guess. The Argentinians are having economic problems again?
Posted by: Fordesque   2006-07-10 00:50  

00:00