You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
No peace through the U.N.
2006-07-23
ITALIAN Prime Minister Romano Prodi has a "solution" to the Israeli-Hezbollah war. He wants to beef up the United Nations peacekeeping force in south Lebanon. I bet you didn't know there was a U.N. peacekeeping force in Lebanon. It's called UNIFIL (United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon), and it's been there since 1978. Been doing a crackerjack job, hasn't it?

Can you name a single instance in which U.N. peacekeepers actually kept the peace? Mostly - as in Lebanon and Bosnia - they stand idly by as terrorists launch attacks. Sometimes - as in the Congo - they commit atrocities themselves.

The current crisis began July 12 when Hezbollah launched a cross-border raid in which three Israeli soldiers were killed and two were kidnapped. Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah told the left-wing British journalist Robert Fisk the raid was five months in the planning. In 2000, Hezbollah had kidnapped three Israeli soldiers, who were later killed. Israel did not respond then with bombs and bullets. It traded 430 prisoners in Israeli jails for the bodies of its soldiers. Hezbollah and its sponsors in Iran and Syria probably expected as timid a response this time. Their surprise must have been unpleasant. Hezbollah has responded by raining rockets on Israel (1,600 as of this writing).
Posted by:Fred

#4  "Can you name a single instance in which U.N. peacekeepers actually kept the peace?"

IFOR perhaps or Cambodia after the kmer, mozambique or Namibia?

Course the fighting was over by then, but you get the point, anyhoo, is it just me or does the name romano prodi as a pm sound like the ieties are hankering after a historic past.
Posted by: pihkalbadger   2006-07-23 22:18  

#3  Napalm is legally usable, just banned by US policy from US use. Also, the Marine Corps has a very nice incendiary bomb that is effectively the same thing, except that the formula is changed a touch to make it Not-Napalm. Flame weapons are not banned by the Geneva Conventions, nor is white phosphorous - stupid politicians in the West have restricted their use, simply for political gain.
Posted by: Shieldwolf   2006-07-23 05:14  

#2  What would Kofi do?

Another nice frisking by Jack Kelly
Posted by: Captain America   2006-07-23 00:47  

#1  In past wars, counter-attack against the type of defenses that Hizbollah has devised, was effected through use of Napalm, which is no longer lawfully usable.
Posted by: Anginens Threreng8133   2006-07-23 00:44  

00:00