You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front Economy
Washington Post radio gets off to a slow, but game start
2006-07-23
Washington Post Radio, which debuted three months ago with an unusual newspaper-on-the-radio format, has turned out to be less than stop-the-presses news for listeners, ratings released yesterday show.
"Boring" is the word you're looking for...
WTWP-AM/FM, which broadcasts a blend of news and talk programming featuring Post journalists, ranked No. 21 among 40 or so local stations during the April-to-June period, according to Arbitron Inc., which surveys listeners. The station drew less than 1 percent of the audience (a 0.9 share), and just 0.8 percent of those ages 25 to 54, the audience segment that advertisers most covet. "It's in the low range of what we expected," said Jim Farley, one of the key architects of the station, which signed on March 30. Farley is vice president of news and programming for WTOP AM-FM, which is owned by Bonneville International Corp., the company that also owns WTWP. (The Post is Bonneville's programming partner on the station but has no ownership stake.) For a station that touted itself as "NPR on caffeine," a large amount of WTWP's audience came not from its daily news discussion shows, but rather from its broadcasts of Washington Nationals games. The games helped boost the station's evening ratings to a 1.8 percent audience share, which is exactly twice its average share the rest of the time.
That NPR flavor doesn't help. Over the course of almost 40 years, I got used to tuning in to WTOP for news and weather (sports don't interest me). WTOP's still around, on FM, and I can hear it for most of my drive to work. WTOP and WTWP are competing under the same roof, and WTOP simply does it better. They've had lots of practice. WTWP sounds like the Washington Post, but not the news pages.
I'd also submit that their call letters are terrible. WAPO would be immediately catchier and make far better jingles: "WA-Po Ra-dio". In news entirely unrelated to this article, a WTWP producer (the guy in charge of the Nats' coverage) was robbed and beaten quite badly this week at a rest stop on the Jersey Turnpike. Be careful out there!
Farley, however, said the station's programming was being widely, if briefly, sampled, accumulating an average of 205,000 people per week. That figure beats more established stations, such as sports-talker WTEM-AM (173,600 per week), and nearly matches guy-talker WJFK-FM (208,500). "We're getting people in the house," Farley said. "If they stick around longer, we will move up quickly" in the ratings, which are based on listeners tuning in at least 15 minutes at a time.
I think they bought a strong slot, put their stuff on it, and now they're watching their slot slide.
The advent of WTWP triggered a complicated shift on the dial among Bonneville's portfolio of local stations, and listeners might still be having trouble finding the station, said Tina Gulland, the Post's director of radio and TV projects. WTWP took WTOP's former frequencies (107.7 FM and 1500 AM) and WTOP moved to WGMS's spot (103.5 FM); WGMS moved to the position occupied by the late Z104 (103.9 and 104.1 FM).
WGMS is Washington's commercial classical music station. Now I'm stuck with Baltimore classical music station, which is public radio. It's not too bad, but it leaves classical music listeners with only one choice.
"Overall, it's a credible, not earth-shattering start. . . . It's still early," Gulland said.
Posted by:Fred

#5  Can't wait for the Dana Milbank drive time show, fart noises and strippers included.
Posted by: ed   2006-07-23 10:59  

#4  The greatest reason to hate NPR is its destruction of commercial classical music stations. Baltimore had 2 (two!) in the 60s and 70s. WGMS was great. Now it's just boring NPR everywhere but Chicago.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-07-23 10:56  

#3  It's that "framing" thing again. Their message isn't getting out 'cos its just not accessible to the masses. Also the wingnuts unfairly occupy all the best bandwidth. Stupid wingnuts and their stupid mass audiences. Buncha sheep.

The DC media rumormills indicate there is much unrest within Fortress WaPo. The bosses are requiring lots more work from their remaining staff, including blog contributions and writing for the radio, much of it unpaid. The local alt weekly had a funny graphic of the WaPo reporters as galley slaves, all chained to their laptops.
Posted by: Seafarious   2006-07-23 10:49  

#2  What, their PBS shows aren't bringing in the big bucks?
Posted by: ed   2006-07-23 10:09  

#1  Realizing their newspaper circulation is poor, thet are reaching out to other markets. Sounds to me like they are in a diversify to build back the market share mode.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2006-07-23 09:33  

00:00