You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
House Blocks Seizure of Legal Guns
2006-07-26
The House voted Tuesday to prevent law enforcement officers from confiscating legally owned guns during a national disaster or emergency. Republican Rep. Bobby Jindal, the Louisiana lawmaker who sponsored the bill, said firearms seizures after Hurricane Katrina left residents unable to defend themselves. "Many of them were sitting in their homes without power, without water, without communication," he said. "It was literally impossible to pick up a phone and call 911."

The House voted 322-99 in support of the bill. Senators voted 84-16 earlier this month to include a similar prohibition in a homeland security funding bill. The limitation would apply to federal law enforcement or military officers, along with local police that receive federal funds.

Rep. Jerrold Nadler, Dimmicrat-N.Y., repeatedly called the bill "insane." He and some Democrats said the bill might satisfy the gun lobby, but it would put people into more danger during already perilous disasters. "The streets of an American city immediately after a disaster are no place to abandon common sense," said Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, Dimmicrat-N.Y.
I suppose that makes sense in a Dhimmicratic sort of way ...
The Fraternal Order of Police endorsed the measure. In a letter to Jindal, National President Chuck Canterbury said law enforcement officials concentrate on search and rescue during major disasters, and breakdowns in communications and transportation can lengthen police response times to calls. "A law-abiding citizen who possesses a firearm lawfully represents no danger to law enforcement officers or any other first responder," Canterbury wrote. The National Rifle Association also supported the bill and has been asking police chiefs and mayors to pledge they will not forcibly disarm law-abiding citizens.
Posted by:Steve

#4  NOTE This only applies to Federal agencies and local agencies that get funds sirectly from the Feds. In the absence of a local law to the contrary, local police may do as their local law allows. Change your local laws. This also does not, I believe, cover situations in which martial law has been declared, for obvious reasons.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-07-26 12:50  

#3  Thanks Mr. Jindal. Nadler you fat, reeking, worthless POS.
Posted by: SOP35/Rat   2006-07-26 12:19  

#2  Faggie Nadler, I have a question: What part of "shall NOT be infringed" don't you understand?
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-07-26 10:55  

#1  Yeah, there's someone "insane" in this story...no surprise it's Nadler. What a disgusting, cowardly lot the Demos are! They don't deserve to have free men defend them.
Posted by: mac   2006-07-26 10:48  

00:00