You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
Saudis Threaten Israel?
2006-07-30
Here's part of the statement put out by the official website of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (h/t, the Belmont Club):

[THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA] WARNS ALL THAT IF THE PEACE OPTION IS REJECTED DUE TO THE ISRAELI ARROGANCE THEN ONLY THE WAR OPTION REMAINS AND NO ONE KNOWS THE REPERCUSSIONS BEFALLING THE REGION, INCLUDING WARS AND CONFLICT THAT WILL SPARE NO ONE INCLUDING THOSE WHOSE MILITARY POWER IS NOW TEMPTING THEM TO PLAY WITH FIRE.

Meanwhile, the Pentagon indicated yesterday that it has new plans to sell billions in weaponry to the Saudis, among others in the region:

The Defense Department reported that they have a plan to sell military hardware and worth up to $5 billion to certain Arab countries. ... The plan calls for a nearly $3 billion deal with Saudi Arabia, involving sales of 58 Abrams tanks and a [sic] upgrade of Saudi-owned Abrams tanks, as well as Apache helicopters worth $400 million, according to a statement released by the Pentagon's Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

Congress has 30 days to approve the sale once it is officially notified.
Posted by:Anonymoose

#17  I think that the Saudis are just putting out some puff pieces for fellow Arab consumption. They will get their a$$es handed to them if they mess around in this conflict.

As far as selling them military equipment, hey, their money is usually good, so why not? It's the expats that keep things maintained. Things get hot, no more expats, nor maintenance, no more air force. Too many outsiders (infidels) know their air defense system, etc so their armed forces could be neutralized without too much extra effort.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2006-07-30 23:30  

#16  And an Abrams can't even take out an Abrams. A Hellfire shot would be equivilent to a paintball shot.

Hellfires are capable of taking out any tank currently made including Abrams, they just don't produce a big bang when they go off usually. Its MAVERICKS that are overkill.
Posted by: Valentine   2006-07-30 22:22  

#15  Didn't someone once say that 95% of all the Saudi petrodollars come form a little strip of land 10K by 40K in size?

The Saudi's should be careful or we will have a, very quick, war for oil.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2006-07-30 22:19  

#14  honkey: i wonder if the US vere thought about hiding secret auot distruct mechanisms in the palnes they sell other nations? which of course we could push at our desire

There is such a mechanism. It's called native maintenance staff coupled with native machinery operators (pilots, tankers, et al).
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2006-07-30 21:58  

#13   Let's collect the money. it isn't like the soddies can actually fight. 58 Abrams is almost 2 armored batalions. BTW, can a Hellfire take out a Abrams?

That's just a single battalion.

And an Abrams can't even take out an Abrams. A Hellfire shot would be equivilent to a paintball shot.
Posted by: badanov   2006-07-30 21:30  

#12  Let's collect the money. it isn't like the soddies can actually fight. 58 Abrams is almost 2 armored batalions. BTW, can a Hellfire take out a Abrams?
Posted by: Brett   2006-07-30 20:58  

#11  The Sauds have been buying very large amounts of French weapons.

Garlic only works on vampires..
Posted by: Uleretch Cromong6523   2006-07-30 20:33  

#10  #4, For a moment there, I thought dot com was back.:)
Posted by: GK   2006-07-30 20:26  

#9  Why don't they just say what they have to say and be done with it. Has this statement been modified since news about Hezb'Allah probably causing the blast has come out?
Posted by: gorb   2006-07-30 20:18  

#8  The Sauds have been buying very large amounts of French weapons.
Posted by: ed   2006-07-30 20:17  

#7   i wonder if the US vere thought about hiding secret auot distruct mechanisms in the palnes they sell other nations? which of course we could push at our desire

Insallah, it won't be necessary.
Posted by: 6   2006-07-30 19:56  

#6  90 km? Since when did we move the border west? I'm not complaining, I just feel out of the loop ...
Posted by: Steve White   2006-07-30 19:53  

#5  i wonder if the US vere thought about hiding secret auot distruct mechanisms in the palnes they sell other nations? which of course we could push at our desire

Posted by: honkey   2006-07-30 19:31  

#4  I say nix the deal.

I have my biases like anyone, in this case I'd say sell weapons only to Israel and the current offical gov. in Iraq. With Iraq I wouldn't sell them anything that could be used outside their own borders. IE no long range stuff.
Posted by: RJB in JC MO   2006-07-30 19:30  

#3  I was thinking it's a smart move by the administration. They get the Soddies to pay for top gear, who then store it on their bases, and then when we do decide to setup the Republic of Eastern Arabia with the 90km corridor, there's a whole load of state of the art bang-bang just waiting to be used ;)
Posted by: Tony (UK)   2006-07-30 19:29  

#2  Selling modern, high tech military equipment to SA is like selling supercomputers to monkeys. It's only a threat if they resell to someone who can use it.
Posted by: Iblis   2006-07-30 19:16  

#1  wonder if these oil whores have actually thought this out? If their fundes are frozen? They'd just be sweaty unbathen homeless assholes without a job or skill to earn their way home....doubt that many smelly hitchhikers would get rides...
Posted by: Frank G   2006-07-30 19:15  

00:00