You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
U.N. issues nuke deadline for Iran
2006-07-31
UNITED NATIONS (AP) -- The U.N. Security Council passed a weakened resolution Monday giving Iran until Aug. 31 to suspend uranium enrichment or face the threat of economic and diplomatic sanctions.

Iran immediately rejected the council action, saying the resolution would only make negotiations more difficult over a package of incentives offered in June for it to suspend enrichment. "All along it has been the persistence of some to draw arbitrary red lines and deadlines that has closed the door to any compromise," Iran's ambassador to the United Nations, Javad Zarif, said. "This tendency has singlehandedly blocked success and in most cases killed proposals in their infancy."

"This approach will not lead to any productive outcome and in fact it can only exacerbate the situation," he said.

Because of Russian and Chinese demands, the text was watered down from earlier drafts, which would have made the threat of sanctions immediate. It now essentially requires the council to hold more discussions before it considers sanctions.
And then more discussions, and more resolutions. Remember Iraq: 17 resolutions, and not one enforced until GWB can along.
The resolution passed by a vote of 14-1. Qatar, which represents Arab states on the council and lives next door to the big bad wolf, cast the lone dissenting vote.

Drafted by Britain, France and Germany with U.S. backing, the resolution follows a July 12 agreement -- by the foreign ministers of those four countries, plus Russia and China -- to refer Tehran to the Security Council for not responding to the incentives package. The ministers asked that council members adopt a resolution making Iran's suspension of enrichment activities mandatory. The resolution includes that demand and calls on all states "to exercise vigilance" in preventing the transfer of all goods that could be used for Iran's enrichment and ballistic missile programs.

"If you remember the reason for that resolution is to make the suspension of enrichment and related activities mandatory and then to give Iran a deadline by which it should accept the now mandatory requirement that it suspend its enrichment activities," U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice told reporters on a flight from Jerusalem.

In a lengthy speech after the resolution was adopted, Zarif told the council it had no legal legitimacy to demand that Iran suspend uranium enrichment and reprocessing. He repeated Iran's claim that it has every right to pursue nuclear technology and does not want to develop nuclear weapons. Zarif faulted the United States and Britain for supporting a 1953 coup in Iran, and blasted the council for being slow to address Iraq's invasion of Iran in 1980 and its use of chemical weapons against Iranians.
You sorta poisoned that well when you took American embassy personnel hostage, remember?
Tehran said last week it would reply to the Western incentive package on Aug. 22, but the council decided to go ahead with a resolution and not wait for Iran's response.

The resolution calls on the U.N nuclear watchdog, the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency, to report back by Aug. 31 on Iran's compliance with the resolution's demands. If Iran does not comply, the council would move to adopt political and economic sanctions, the resolution said.

Diplomats said the threats spelled out in the resolution would be revoked if Iran agrees to the package of incentives. "It does not mean an end to the negotiations and we reaffirm the proposals," France's U.N. Ambassador Jean-Marc de La Sabliere said. "We appeal to Iran to positively respond to the substantive proposals that we made last month."

Explaining his "no" vote, Qatar's U.N. Ambassador Nassir Al-Nasser said that while the demands of the six nations were legitimate, the resolution will only exacerbate tensions in the region and Iran should be given more time to respond because his country doesn't want to get clobbered. "We do not agree with the tabling of this resolution at a time when our region is in flames," Al-Nasser said. "We see no harm in waiting for a few days to exhaust all possible means and in order to identify the real intentions of Iran."
Posted by:anonymous5089

#14  IMO the best the Dems can hope to accomplish is to gain a few seats, not enuff to threaten or stifle GOP control or Right-leaning/centric GOP-Dem Moderates. The broad agenda for the DemoLeft is to get America under PC "justified" OWG and overt National Socialism which for the Clintons is Communism. CLINTONISM > America = Socialist Amerika is a SOCIALIST COUNTRY = PRO-SOCIALIST COUNTRY being led by the wrong type or kind of Socialists + wrong type/kind of Socialism. amongst other "straight arrow" = PDeniable, John Wayne = Jimmy Carter, Hitler = Stalin, etc. premises. Wid mediocre to failed domestic electioneering andanti-GOP efforts, the only thing/ace card the DemoLeft has left is "American Hiroshima(s)", i.e decapitation strike = PDeniable reactionary terror attack agz Dubya-GOP. Hillary and Co-POTUSes will rule becuz they weirdly and mysteriously survived the WMD attacks of Radical Islam-Terror as MSM-Leftpert verified caused by Bush-GOP. IFF ONE ACCEPTS THAT THE WOT IS A WAR BY AND FOR SOCIALISM = GLOBALISM, AS WELL AS AGAINST
"ISLAMO-FASCISM", DEMOLEFT > THE ANTITHESIS OF ISLAM-FASCISM IS ISLAMO-COMMUNISM. A WAR AGAINST FASCISM = WAR FOR COMMUNISM. Thus for the DemoLeft and MSM, FASCIST > both Hated Despicable Nazi-Hitlerists + Well-intentioned but defective and unruly imperialist, de-regulated, Limited Totalitarianist-Governmentist LEFTCOMMUNIST, AN ERROR-PRONE LIMITED MARXIST-STALINIST. ONE SIDE = ALL SIDES = NO SIDE(S), EVERYONE = ANYONE = NO ONE. Iff the Cold War=era USSR-Red China, but espec the USSR, were the in charge, Iran or any other nation would already be invaded iff not conquered, even as the diploms were conversing and debating before the People's Global Assembly at the Red Banner UNO. ROBERT'S RULES OF ORDER, etal laws, protocols, or courtesies is for America and Western democracies, NOT THE ULTRA-LEFT USSR-RED CHINA. RADICAL ISLAMISTS + SECUALRISTS > WAR MUST OCCUR + USA SUFFER CASUALTY-INTENSIVE ATTACKS IN ORDER FOR ANTI-AMERICAN AMERIKANS-GLOBALISTS, etal ANTI-DEMOCRATIC GOVT-ISTS, CENTRALISTS, AND REGULATORY TOTALITARIANISTS-ABSOLUTISTS, TO HOLD PUBLIC OFFICE(S), to ensure OWG and that hyperpower America is IRREVOCABLY, PERMANENTLY SUBORNED UNDER SAME. Russia-China & SCO, aka Commie Asia, aka Mackinder's World Island of Eurasia, won't have to worry anout attaining "parity" wid hyperpower America + West circa 2030-2050 iff America + West no longer exists by Year 2015-2020, now won't they!? GORBACHEVISM > IFF THE USSR-COMMIE BLOC-EAST CANNOT SUCCCEED IN ACHIEVING THE POWER, WEALTH, AND STANDARDS OF THE US-WEST, THE US-WEST WILL BE BROUGHT DOWN TO THE LEVELS OF COMMUNISM = the EAST. GORBACHEVISM > INVERSE PARITY TO ACHIEVE SOLE SUPERIORITY-VICTORY, more contemporarily known as "THE DUMBING DOWN OF AMERICA", from FIRST WORLD to THIRD WORLD. FIRST WORLD AMERICA must be "constrained/controlled" by MOSTLY THIRD WORLD WORLD COMMUNITY = UNO. MALE BRUTE FASCISTS > defective lowly Rightist Authoritarians = also well-meaning Limited Totalitarianists, i.e COMMUNIST CAPITALISTS/COMMPITALISTS. America = Amerika's volunterr army is allowed to attack Iran-North Korea, BUT NOT WIN OR PREVAIL AGAINST SAME, UNTIL WASHINGTON COMMUNIZES-STALINIZES EVERYTHING BACK IN CONUS - you know, Lefties telling the Amer people/voter "the Truth" = Propanganda-PCorrectness.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-08-01 00:22  

#13  Dave D.- Excellent! $500 is a very very nice contribution. I hope she appreciates you! I'm not well off, but I'm up to half that much. :)
Posted by: Supple Whomper9999   2006-07-31 18:13  

#12  Vis Iran - SSDD
Posted by: Zenster   2006-07-31 17:50  

#11  I sent Diana Irey $500 a couple weeks back. It felt good-- damn good.
Posted by: Dave D.   2006-07-31 17:37  

#10  Ah, I get ya. I'm putting money into a few "key" House campaigns - against Murtha, for example. It seems we agree November will be a true pivotal moment in the history of the US. I admit I am pessimistic to put it at 50-50, so I'm doing what little I can.

See you on the other side. :)
Posted by: Supple Whomper9999   2006-07-31 17:24  

#9  Heh. Your last two lines sum it up pretty well.

I'm not saying that what we're hoping for regarding Iran won't happen; I'm just saying I don't want to set myself up for a big disappointment.

Posted by: Dave D.   2006-07-31 17:00  

#8  Hmmm... Not to start grief, but with the exception of one possibility, I can't see why, Dave D.

Things seem to be shaping up for the sequence of confrontations needed to make the case to the US public and Congress. The Mullahs are being extremely helpful in so many ways, too.

I don't have access to the Bush timeline, and wouldn't say anything at all if I did, but the moment of truth clearly approaches, IMO. Whether it will occur per DMFD's prediction, is well beyond my poor info. That it will occur, however, I have no doubt - unless, and here's that one exception that worries me:

If the Dhimmicrats take control of the House in November. In that case, reality will surely be derailed -- dropping US foreign policy in the shitter. If that happens - we're fucked. Impeachment bullshit, the watered down resolution regards Iran will stand, and the focus will be forcibly shifted to inane domestic partisan bullshit and Tranzi appeasement... all of the stuff that simply doesn't matter if we lose the WoT. It will be a circus of fools running an appeasement festival of Tranzi surrenders and domestic boondoggles sure to make us all paupers. I believe I've read some comments from you that echo my pessimism, in this case.

If the Republicans hold the house, Iran's dead meat.

If they don't, we are.
Posted by: Supple Whomper9999   2006-07-31 16:41  

#7  We're going to see economic sanctions, a naval quarantine. and the feared oil weapon. No more gas for Iranians. There may even be some industrial accidents in the few refineries Iran does have. Let the Iranians handle it from there.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-07-31 16:36  

#6  un brilliantly extended the deadline from the proclaimed 8/22 to the 31st. This should give Prez Dinnerjacket a few laughs, and since it is pre-rejected, why not stir the pot now with a strongly worded demarche from France and get that out of the way too?
Posted by: Inspector Clueso   2006-07-31 16:30  

#5  I'd dearly love to believe he'd do that, DMFD, but I've given up hope.
Posted by: Dave D.   2006-07-31 16:15  

#4  If the Democrats don't regain power in November, look for GWB to flatten the Iranian nuke sites some time shortly thereafter.
Posted by: DMFD   2006-07-31 16:09  

#3  How long to proclaim 17 resolutions, the standard set by Saddam?
Posted by: Sherry   2006-07-31 15:08  

#2  Anybody have any ideas just how long this sick, stupid, senseless charade is going to be allowed to continue before somebody actually does something about the menace of Nuts With Nukes?

Sheesh...

Posted by: Dave D.   2006-07-31 14:32  

#1  YAWN!!!!
Posted by: Alan C   2006-07-31 14:28  

00:00