You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Attacks may prompt Israel rethink at UN
2006-08-07
Sunday's deadly Katyusha attacks in Kfar Giladi and Haifa could change the way Israel relates to the US-French draft resolution at the UN Security Council calling for a cessation of hostilities, senior diplomatic officials said Sunday evening. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert was expected to hold meetings deep into the night with the top security-brass to discuss the ramifications of Sunday's attacks, and whether to widen the scope of the present operations. "This may change everything," one senior official said.

The attacks may re-open discussions in the government and in the IDF on whether to launch a final push to the Litani River. Over the last few days, divisions have emerged between Olmert and Defense Minister Amir Peretz, with Peretz favoring a push to the Litani, and at one point late last week instructing the army to draw up plans, but Olmert arguing that it would not be necessary since the missiles could continue to be launched from further north of the river.

Olmert prevailed, and the issue was not even raised at a meeting of the Forum of Seven, Olmert's kitchen cabinet, that met Saturday night. However, government officials said, the recent events could change matters.
Posted by:Fred

#6  If the United NAtions cannot take a stand clearly against PRIVATE religious militias, that is going to send a bad message.
Where are all the "international lawyers" on this subject?
Posted by: J. D. Lux   2006-08-07 11:32  

#5  I have complete faith that the UN will flounder and never really get any resolution out the door, let alone UN troops into Leb. Israel will have all the time it needs to get this job done, I for one hope they go slow and steady. Once complete, they will call the UN and ask for help with the humanitarian mission.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2006-08-07 08:35  

#4  what proof do we have that the UN will REALLY send a strong enough international force with the right to fight, and the will to dismantle Hezboschmuck, and to stop Syrian and Iranian weapons to enter Lebanon?

I think it safe to take as an article of faith as basic as one's belief/non-belief in the existence of God that the UN will not send a strong enough force to do any of those things, and actually any force they do send will be counterproductive rather than helpful.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-08-07 05:55  

#3  Agreed.

But then, I hope Olmert will give the IDF time to expand carefully but strongly till the Litani, even if this needs 2 or 3 weeks more.

Wouldn't it be a disaster to allow a part of Hezbonuts infrastructure to remain between Israel and the Litani ?

Anyway, what proof do we have that the UN will REALLY send a strong enough international force with the right to fight, and the will to dismantle Hezboschmuck, and to stop Syrian and Iranian weapons to enter Lebanon ?

Israel shall protect itself, and not rely on the UN.
Posted by: leroidavid   2006-08-07 03:15  

#2  They have fired some from Bekaa Valley locations well beyond Litani. Also, IDF generals, not this shithead schmuck Peretz are afraid of a large Israeli unit being trapped, cut off and killed if they penetrate too far. Supply lines are vulnerable. Elaborate traps and ambushes have already been executed and Israelis can't get wounded out in timely fashion. So, maybe they don't want a spearhead column penetrating so deeply just yet.
Posted by: SOP35/Rat   2006-08-07 02:17  

#1  Personally, I do hope that the IDF will be permitted by Olmert to reach the Litani.

I dont understand the strange argument of Olmert, replying to Peretz that he opposes this move because the Hezbonuts would still be able to fire missiles from the other bank of the Litani.

As most of the rockets fired by the Hezboschmucks have a range of 17 km (correct me if I am wrong), reaching the Litani, which is mostly 20 km far from Israel northern border, would put an end to the firing of those rockets on Israel. There would still be the permanent danger of the syrian missiles that have been fired on Haifa, Afula and Hadera, but, then, the IAF would have less targets to search and destroy, and would be able to concentrate its fire on those remaining missile launchers.

So, I hope Peretz will prevail. I criticized him some days ago, but I was wrong: it seems that it's Olmert who is slowing down, not Peretz.
Posted by: leroidavid   2006-08-07 01:26  

00:00