Submit your comments on this article | ||
China-Japan-Koreas | ||
South Koreans rally for U.S. alliance | ||
2006-08-12 | ||
![]()
Police said about 5,000 people, many of them elderly veterans, turned out for the demonstration that underlined the worsening divide in South Korean society over the government's push for the return of wartime command. South Korea transferred control of its forces to a U.S.-led U.N. command in 1950 that helped the country repel invading communists from North Korea during the 1950-53 Korean War. While peacetime control of the military was given to the South in 1994, the U.S. takes control of the South's military if war breaks out on the Korean Peninsula. In case of war, South Korea is to transfer command of Korean forces to the US. US Forces Korea has the command, control and intelligence assets to command a major war. The Koreans will have to spend major Won to acquire those assets. While they are at it, they might want to spend a few more Won to stock enough ammunition for 30 days. Massive US stocks, that SKor relies on, will be withdrawn. South Korea and the U.S. have been in talks on the issue since Seoul formally proposed taking over the command last year. The two sides are expected to draw a roadmap for the proposed transfer when their defense chiefs hold annual talks in October in Washington. President Roh wants wartime command by 2012. The US offered to do it in 2008. The issue has recently become a hot topic in security-sensitive South Korea — which faces the communist North across the world's most heavily fortified border — as critics stepped up their campaign against the government's move. Among those speaking publicly against the plan have been many of the country's former defense ministers, who claim the command transfer is premature and would unravel the country's alliance with Washington and undercut deterrence against North Korea. "I oppose taking over the operational command. It's premature," Lee Sang-hoon, who served as the country's defense minister in 1988-1990, said at Friday's rally. Yesterday 16 former defense ministers very publicly came out against Roh's plans. President Roh rejected the criticism this week, saying the South's military is strong enough to take over the command anytime, and leaving it with the U.S. is a slight to national sovereignty. His blunt rebuff further fueled the debate. Officials say Washington also supports handing over the command to the South.
Expect even more reductions after transfer of wartime control. A lot of personnel and assets will be redundant. And don't expect the 700,000 US reinforcements currently allocated for Korea in case of war. | ||
Posted by:ed |
#2 I sure hope Kia and Hyundai set up shop over here. Oh, who cares? The Chinese will fill the void. |
Posted by: Perfesser 2006-08-12 10:18 |
#1 And don't expect the 700,000 US reinforcements currently allocated for Korea in case of war. Considering that there are only about 520,000 servicemembers in the Active Army with major commitments elsewhere, its a good bet that they are basically left to their own devices. However, I suspect that conventionally the NKPA is about as effective as the Iraqi was under Saddam. Lack of food has hit them as well, no funding for real training and modernizing, officers appointed for political reliability rather than merit, etc. The only question is if there is 'will' on the part of the South Koreans to resist. If they are unwilling, why should Americans do the dirty work? If they are willing, they won't need us anyway. |
Posted by: Glenter Ulineper8090 2006-08-12 09:53 |