You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
What Israel has done for US lately
2006-08-13
By YOSSI KUPERWASSER
Jerusalem Post
Aug. 13, 2006 1:53 | Updated Aug. 13, 2006 9:10

I don't agree with this analysis, but it's worth reading it

Many pundits in Washington, among them supporters of Israel, anticipated better results from the month-long war against Hizbullah.

They were hoping for Israel to put Iran and Syria on the defensive by using IDF military might to eradicate Hizbullah much faster. Some have already concluded that this was an opportunity squandered.

The truth is that the last month has not been "a walk in the park" for Israel. We have been fighting a ruthless, well-armed and well-trained, albeit small, army that has spent the last six years preparing for this war while we have been busy on many other fronts.

Nevertheless, those in Washington who are disappointed with the results should consider a list of dividends that America has received from our campaign: First and foremost, Israel has sent a loud and clear message that any terrorist entity that carries out an act of aggression will pay a heavy price.

Moreover, we have proven that a "spoiled" Western society, as Hizbullah perceived Israel, can withstand barrages of rocket-fire on its civilians and still maintain an unfaltering resolution to stand up and fight.

Second, by exerting heavy military pressure on Hizbullah and the Lebanese government, we forced the collapse of Nasrallah's strategy that was based on unaccountability and terror-deterrence.

In so doing, we created the necessary conditions to compel the international community to take long-overdue measures to implement earlier UN resolutions that the free world hopes will ultimately turn Lebanon into an accountable, sovereign nation.

If this happens, Syria and Iran would be the main losers of this war. Security Council Resolution 1701 approved Friday is the direct result of that pressure, and now it is up to the international community to ensure that it is implemented.

Third, we helped people across the globe world understand the extent of the threat that Iranian radicalism poses to the entire free world, and why it is so important to prevent it from becoming a nuclear power.

Fourth, we exposed Syria's role in supporting terror - both by facilitating the transport of Iranian weapons to Hizbullah, and by supplying its own heavy, long-range rockets and other weaponry to this terror organization. You might be surprised to know that until this war, the international community had refused to acknowledge that Syria supplied these rockets to Hizbullah.

Fifth, we have shown how irresponsible the Russians were in supplying Syria with state-of-the-art weapons that have ended up in the hands of Hizbullah.

And finally, we helped the world to better understand the dangers posed by Hizbullah's fundamentalist brainwashing machine. In terms of the systematic and deliberate killing of civilians, the difference between Iranian-sponsored Hizbullah and Nazi Germany is that while the SS sought to conceal its deeds - including from German society - Hizbullah proudly proclaims its successes in killing Jewish civilians. This stream of distorted Islamist extremism is cut from the same cloth of twisted ideology to which the planners of the thwarted terror attacks on airliners flying out of London subscribe.

This is a short list of what Israel has achieved in the last month. These significant, concrete advances should go a long way to satisfying those wondering what Israel has done lately for those who live in the land of the free and the home of the brave.

The writer is a brigadier-general and former head of IDF Military Intelligence's research department.
Posted by:leroidavid

#6  Runways B. Cratered.

Troop trains?
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-08-13 22:41  

#5  "The interesting part comes when IF those 15,000 troops are on the ground."

There - fixed that for ya', #4 phil.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2006-08-13 22:38  

#4  I think the most important thing this war has done is make the Tranzis at the UN (France, Italy, Spain?) faced up to the fact that resolutions are all well and good, but it's a whole different matter when you have to enforce them.

The interesting part comes when those 15,000 troops are on the ground.
Posted by: phil_b   2006-08-13 22:30  

#3  lotp: Bush has formally notified Congress he's sending jet fuel etc. to Israel. Congress can veto it within 60 days (or do they have to approve? I forget ...) At any rate, in practical terms this is a big expense out of the Defense budget, which is already strained with Iraq etc.

This isn't a gift. They're paying for it:

The Pentagon notified Congress on Friday that it planned to sell Israel JP-8 aviation fuel valued at up to $210 million to help its aircraft "keep peace and security in the region."

Israel sought the fuel about six months ago as part of a continuing purchase program, a knowledgeable Pentagon official said.

The last time an Israeli jet fuel request triggered a congressional notification was in September 2004. The threshold for such notice in Israel's case is $50 million. Israel's previous, congressionally notified, request sought fuel worth up to $102 million if all options were exercised.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2006-08-13 22:18  

#2  He's reminding Congresscritters.

Bush has formally notified Congress he's sending jet fuel etc. to Israel. Congress can veto it within 60 days (or do they have to approve? I forget ...) At any rate, in practical terms this is a big expense out of the Defense budget, which is already strained with Iraq etc.

The writer is reminding Congress of what they are getting for their investment.
Posted by: lotp   2006-08-13 19:39  

#1  These significant, concrete advances should go a long way to satisfying those wondering what Israel has done lately for those who live in the land of the free and the home of the brave.

Those capable of acepting the argument, wouldn't need to be convinced in the first place.
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-08-13 19:37  

00:00