You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
France to lead beefed-up UN force in Lebanon
2006-08-15
France and Italy are leading the scramble to beef up the small UN monitoring force in southern Lebanon which will be key to making the tenuous ceasefire that started Monday durable.Under UN Security Council Resolution 1701, unanimously adopted Friday, the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) is to swell from its current 1,990-strong force to 15,000 international troops.
I smell money! Sweet, sweet money for all the EUrocrats and UNocrats. Getcher free money here!

Here is a provisional breakdown of countries prepared to contribute troops:
“Although frantic moves are being made to get the new UNIFIL deployed as quickly as possible, there is no firm timetable. Israel has said its soldiers will remain in strategic positions in southern Lebanon until UNIFIL troops take over. ”
FRANCE
French President Jacques Chirac, whose country drafted the UN resolution with the United States, has said France will assume its responsibilities, "particularly concerning the new UNIFIL force." Reports say France would command the UNIFIL deployment. The defence ministry has said it is "too early" to put a figure to France's troop contribution, although press reports have spoken of several thousand. One French official, speaking anonymously, said 4,000 "seems a feasible number," while a military source said the actual number of French soldiers in Lebanon would likely be around 2,500. A French military planning officer was due to arrive at the UN peacekeeping operations department in New York Monday. In addition, five military engineers were expected in Lebanon to assess road transport reconstruction needs.

ITALY
Italy has agreed to send some troops, according to both the Lebanese and Israeli governments. Italian defence officials cited by the media have spoken of between 2,000 and 3,000 soldiers. The government is to meet on Friday to set out the details of the mission.

MALAYSIA
Malaysia's Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi has said the country will send a battalion of 1,000 soldiers once the UN gives the green light.

RUSSIA
Russia is considering the possibility of participating but the foreign ministry said a decision had not been made.

BELGIUM
Belgian Defence Minister Andre Flahaut told AFP that Brussels intended to send troops but it was unclear how many because the mandate had not yet been defined.

SPAIN
A government official told AFP Spain planned to send 700 soldiers. Defence Minister Jose Antonio Alonso said in a radio interview Monday: "It is especially important to arrive at a peace and Spain, as a member of the United Nations, is ready to help out."

GERMANY
Germany's interior and defence ministers have said they are in favour of contributing soldiers, but no number has been advanced and parliament has yet to vote on any deployment.

PORTUGAL
Portugal has said it is willing to contribute troops, without specifying how many.

THAILAND
Thailand has said it would consider "positively" a UN request for troops, without giving a number.

INDONESIA, MOROCCO and TURKEY
These three Muslim countries have all agreed to take part, according to the Lebanese prime minister's office, but Turkey indicated Monday that it would wait for an expected new UN resolution "to bring more clarity." Again, no firm numbers have been given.

These countries are undecided or have apparently ruled out supplying soldiers to the new force:

AUSTRALIA
Australian Prime Minister John Howard has said he was undecided whether to supply troops. "If we were to make a decision to make a commitment it would be a very small, niche commitment," he said. "We have other responsibilities."

BRITAIN
British Prime Minister Tony Blair has said his country's military -- engaged in Iraq and Afghanistan -- is too stretched to be involved in the reinforced UNIFIL deployment.

INDIA
India said there were no plans to add to its 672 soldiers already serving in the current UNIFIL. A foreign ministry spokesman said: "I see nothing leading to that."

NORWAY
A Norwegian foreign ministry spokeswoman said "it is too early to go into any detail about a Norwegian contribution to a peacekeeping force for Lebanon."

UNITED STATES
The United States, Israel's closest ally, is thought unlikely to contribute to a force in Lebanon.

Although frantic moves are being made to get the new UNIFIL deployed as quickly as possible, there is no firm timetable. Israel has said its soldiers will remain in strategic positions in southern Lebanon until UNIFIL troops take over. UNIFIL, under its original mandate, has been in operating in southern Lebanon for 28 years. That rolling mandate was again extended for one month by a UN Security Council vote on July 31. It currently counts troops from China, France, Ghana, India, Ireland, Italy, Poland and Ukraine, under French command. Under UN resolution 1701, the expanded force is to support the Lebanese army as it takes up positions in southern Lebanon, formerly
* cough cough *
a Hezbollah-controlled zone, and help in humanitarian work. The resolution says UNIFIL will "take all necessary action in areas of deployment of its forces, and as it deems within its capabilities, to ensure that its area of operations is not utilized for hostile activities of any kind."
Posted by:Seafarious

#15  Matt:

Although I like India as much as the next guy, I wouldn't call it a "western" nation. I've been there a couple of times, and I'd consider them as "Eastern" as it gets, both in culture and values--and they are proud of it, even if some of the young people like to superficially ape what Americans do.
Posted by: sludge   2006-08-15 18:06  

#14  UN don't want American troops there because they would fire at the hizzys in about the first hour they were there and dare Kofi to tell them to stop.
Posted by: djohn66   2006-08-15 16:29  

#13  Matt:

We think we know what they're supposed to do. What they actually do is another matter whatsoever. Didn't I read that there were to be 15k troops? Nowhere even close to that number yet, unless it includes Hezbollah Lebanese military. And, I love our western nations respones:

Aussies: "Nope, we're busy elsewhere."
Brits: "Nah, I'm doing my hair that month."
U.S.: "Nah, unless you allow us ROEs that are "proactive" and we can redeem our 200+ Marines killed there in the 80's."
India: "We already have hundreds there, what more do you want from a nation of a billion+?"
Posted by: BA   2006-08-15 15:02  

#12  Leaving aside the question of who provides the troops -- which certainly has the look of a goat rodeo in the making-- I haven't seen anything specifying what the troops are supposed to do when they get there. Olmert originally requested "combat" troops -- which I took to mean "troops ready, willing and authorized to engage in combat"-- and I've also seen references to "robust" rules of engagement, whatever that means. So suppose the hypothetical Malaysian contingent comes across a group of Hezbollah setting up a rocket launcher. Do they (a) start shooting (b) call Kofi for instructions which will never come (c) mill about smartly or (d) help set up the launcher?
Posted by: Matt   2006-08-15 13:07  

#11  Wrong, the French military WON the Algerian war and taht wa&s squandered by De Gaulle who was maneuvering to congratiate himself with the two bit diactaors from Arab countries.
Posted by: JFM   2006-08-15 12:55  

#10  The New and Improved™ UNIFIL. This is classic Lucy, Football, and Charlie Brown. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. I hope Israel tosses out Olmert and Peretz. They have been an unmitigated disaster for Israel.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2006-08-15 11:10  

#9  What nation with a competent military would allow it's soldiers to be commanded by the French, a nation whose military has not won a war in almost two centuries?
Posted by: RWV   2006-08-15 10:53  

#8  
Posted by: doc   2006-08-15 07:54  

#7  Or swim.
Posted by: Seafarious   2006-08-15 07:37  

#6  I say let 'em walk. :-)
Posted by: gorb   2006-08-15 05:27  

#5  Muslims are over represented in the French Defense service, and the French are Eurabian stooges. Instead of human shields, the Hizbis can use French troops.
Posted by: Snease Shaiting3550   2006-08-15 05:25  

#4  You know who will be providing the airlift of course.
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-08-15 03:34  

#3  France (hehe), Malaysia, Indonesia, Morocco....

What could possibly go wrong?
Posted by: CrazyFool   2006-08-15 00:46  

#2  Ruskies probably would like to reclaim some of the antitank missiles they sold Syria that were fired on Israeli tanks.

More likely, they want to sell them more.
Posted by: Captain America   2006-08-15 00:41  

#1  bwhahaha France to lead anything is just so damn funny.
Posted by: djohn66   2006-08-15 00:16  

00:00