You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Terror Networks
Moment of Truth
2006-08-20
Islamo-fascist terror could trigger a brutal Western response
By Ralph Peters

In the wake of Israel's strategic setback in Lebanon, where's the Middle East headed? (Hint: The road sign doesn't read "Age of Aquarius").

Powerful emotions intoxicate all sides. In the Middle East, only the Israelis have intellectual and moral integrity. Arabs and Persians rely on a culture of blame. The media obscure as much as they illumine.

So what should truly concern us? Bad news first.

Within the forces of terror, the balance of power has shifted. Sunni fanatics, such as al Qaeda's supporters, have suffered severe losses in Afghanistan, Iraq and around the world. Still capable of doing serious damage, they're nonetheless being eclipsed in importance by state-backed Shia terrorists, with Hezbollah in the lead and Iran providing arms, money, training and strategic depth.

* A postmodern terrorist army - Hezbollah's - just achieved the first terrorist defeat of a powerful state on a conventional battlefield. The strategic echoes will embolden extremists throughout the Middle East and beyond.

* Iran, a state that openly sponsors terrorism, is well on the way to possessing nuclear weapons. And the world community pretends it doesn't really matter. Worse, military action to destroy Tehran's dispersed and bunkered nuclear program would require a massive, sustained effort - and still might fail. Iran's been playing poker while the West plays Old Maids.

* Iraq could fail - if the Iraqis fail themselves. It's still too early to pack up and leave, but if the people of Iraq will not seize the opportunity we gave them to build the region's first Arab-majority rule-of-law democracy, it won't be an American defeat, but another self-inflicted Arab disaster. Iraq is the Arab world's last chance - and the odds are now 50-50 they'll throw it away.

* Lebanon, the region's other "almost" democracy, is in shambles, thanks to Hezbollah's ruthlessness and Israel's misjudgments. By failing to take Lebanon's complex group psychologies into account, Israel's air campaign converted Hezbollah opponents into Hezbollah supporters.

* Syria escaped the recent fighting with just a few tactical nicks. Now Bashar Assad appears stunningly unaware of his odious regime's vulnerability. And over-confident dictatorships do very stupid things.

* The region's Sunni- Arab autocracies - on which we have relied, to our great shame - are terrified and unstable. Egypt, the Gulf city-states and even Saudi Arabia expected Israel to make short work of the Shia-Hezbollah problem. Instead, Hezbollah won - and the subjects of those sheiks and kings and eternal presidents have been cheering.

* Crucial oil producers on the Arab side of the Persian Gulf grow more vulnerable each day. Iran intends to exert hegemony over the region through nuclear threats and the exploitation of Shia discontents. The world's worst real-estate investment is luxury property in Dubai.

There's more, of course, from the Islamist takeover in Somalia, at the region's southern edge, to the Dorian Gray decomposition of the Pakistani state at its eastern extreme. So what on earth might give us cause for hope?

* Israel's recent defeat, for one thing. Yes, you read that right. The truth is that Israel got a relatively cheap, if embarrassing, wake-up call. And Israel's a part of Western civilization, not of the Middle East's decaying cultures. That means that Israel doesn't just wallow in blame - like Americans, Israelis figure out what went wrong and then fix it. After the post-war soul-searching and investigations are finished, failed leaders will be replaced and Israel will re-emerge with a renewed sense of mission, a stronger government and a powerfully reformed military - the next time the IDF goes to war, watch the way it devastates its enemies.

* The "unity of Muslims" confronting the West is history (it was always a bogus, ramshackle affair). Sunni-Arab leaders increasingly grasp that the real threat isn't from the United States or Israel, but from the explosion of Shia ambitions, prowess, wealth and desire for vengeance. The future of the Middle East could go a number of ways, but we may find ourselves as bemused spectators, while our sworn enemies and phony friends kill each other. Afterward, we'll pick up the pieces.

* Iraq still could muddle through - but even if it doesn't, our stock in the region is headed up, not down. The paradox is that a future civil war between Iraq's Sunnis and Shias makes our military protection more essential than ever to the effete Gulf emirates and the cowardly Saudis. Avoid linear analysis and reflexive predictions of doom for American interests: The Middle East will always do more harm to its natives than it does to foreign powers. Human beings may hate a distant enemy in theory, but they generally prefer to kill their neighbors.

* Terrorist groups with global aspirations continue to pursue grand, counterproductive gestures rather than effective actions. Plots to blow up a series of airliners, lesser strikes on subways or trains in the West and even the eventual "big one" they'll pull off won't convince the West to surrender. Despite intermittent left-wing lunacy, our debates and disagreements are about how best to solve the problem - not how to capitulate. Bit by bit, the Western mood is turning from disbelief regarding the "terrorist threat" to hard-knuckled realism about extremist Islam. 9/11 taught the terrorists little of use and many wrong lessons. It may be hard for some of us to discern what's really happening, but the Islamists are resurrecting a militant, ruthless West.

The florid American master of horror fiction, H. P. Lovecraft, warned his characters, "Do not raise up what ye cannot put down." Islamist terrorists are reviving the West's thirst for blood. And this time it won't be slaked in Flanders.

Things are going to get uglier east of Suez. And we're going to win.
Posted by:ryuge

#15  Second draft (still not so good),

And lo! There came a time when a band of stout men were walking up a hill towards the sound of the guns and there

came a moaning from a figure beside the road. The Master of the small band, being a Samaritan, did stop his troop

and bent down beside the man moaning beside the road.

"Oh, woe, oh, woe, oh, woe unto me for the world endeth and there is nought that I nor any other can do except

accept...oh, woe, oh, woe, oh, woe...," came the words from the moaning figure again and again.

The Master stood, pulling his hand away from the man's shoulder who he has just been checking for as to give what

comfort he may.

Turning away, the Master motioned his men into motion then took a moment, stepped back, and spoke to the man lying

beside the road.

"Cry on, oh, ye of little heart,
and fainter courage cry on,
Better yet, cry on and lyeth thee down beside this well-travelled road.

Myself and my lads,
will render ye here,
what little aid that we can,
but business we have,
up this hill there aways,
of a kind you just can't,
weigh the measure.

You must see that,
unlike yourself,
we're simply just not like you,
and we just cannot lay us down,
and simply forget who we are,
like those who're like you,
who are simply the fools,
who forget who it is,
that they are,
and who prattle like fools,
and scamper like tools,
and proclaim themselves
misfortunate all.

For misfortune we have,
and some we may meet,
but we are not willing to stop,
and simply lie down,
and wait for the hounds,
should death be our waypoint to keep.

"While you shall do nought,
but lie here and cry,
we shall go there and likely die,
In truth we would not have you with us for naught,
for your spirit would serve only to drain,
to spear our hearts through,
and get us all slain,
and then 't'wold all be for nought."

"But knoweth ye this,
oh ye weak and faint heart,
stout men of courage shall stand,
for thee and for thine,
and should we be not,
stout, strong 'nough through the command,
should the killers come nie,
send prayers for us all upon high,
for they surely shall not,
and though all we wrought,
surely at least thou shalt die."

"And know ye this truth,
-----
that should we fail ,
and though thou surely will die,
we stood for thee true,
though we knew ye did not,
but lie 'side the road and still cry.

For we could do no less,
the men that we are,
though of hardened of heart and of hew,
Though we stopped,
tried to help,
we could not but weep,
for ye whom we what came across.

For thou shalt still cry,
while the wild bullets fly,
and the devils flay you alive."

"I shall leave you 'lone now,
oh ye poor lowly sly,
while my boys and I have still have life.
And while we still live,
so ye shall still live,
though it costs us all of our might.

But lie here, be still
and cry if thou will,
for it does but make me heave sigh.
For my own I fight on,
and for thine I fight on,
but for thee I only but cry."
Posted by: FOTSGreg   2006-08-20 21:22  

#14  Islam is a red light, not yellow and not green. I can in no way defend it. Ergo, I must pull it by the roots. For it is very bad seed indeed. It is a weed in the garden. This gutter religion is responsible for most of the misery and depravity on this planet. It is a vile representation of what you can NOT LIVE WITH. They crossed every line. They called the war. They were given plenty of notice. They heed not. Patience still. The horsemen awake.
Posted by: newc   2006-08-20 20:40  

#13  Drat! Needs work...

Posted by: FOTSGreg   2006-08-20 20:33  

#12  J.P. Devine is not part of the solution, he's part of the problem.

And lo! There came a time when a band of stout men were walking up a hill towards the sound of the guns and there came a moaning from a figure beside the road. The Master of the small band, being a Samaritan, did stop his troop and bent down beside the man moaning beside the road.

"Oh, woe, oh, woe, oh, woe unto me for the world endeth and there is nought that I nor any other can do except accept...oh, woe, oh, woe, oh, woe...," came the words from the moaning figure again and again.

The Master stood, pulling his hand away from the man's shoulder who he has just been checking for as to give what comfort he may.

Turning away, the Master motioned his men into motion then took a moment, stepped back, and spoke to the man lying beside the road.

"Cry on, oh, ye of little heart and fainter courage. Cry on. Better yet, cry on, and continue to lie thee down beside this well-travelled road. Myself and my lads here will render what aid we can, but we have business yonder up the hill a ways - business that you and your ilk might find unpalatable, for, unlike you, we are not willing to lie down and cry for our misfortune. Misfortune we may have, and misfortune we may meet. Aye, misfortune even unto death. Heed, what I sayeth here."

"While you shall do nought but lie here and cry, we shall go there and likely die. In truth, we would not have you with us for your spirit would serve only to spear our hearts and drain us dry."

"But knoweth this, oh ye weak and faint of heart, stout men of courage shall stand for thee and thine. Should we be not strong enough, and should the enemy come nie, remember us, for they shall not, and surely thou shalt die."

"And know ye this, that should we fail, and though thou surely die, we stood for thee, though we knew ye did not, but lie beside the road and cry. For we could do no less being what we are, men of hardened heart. Though we stopped to help, we could but weep, for what we came across. For thou shalt cry while the bullets fly, and the devils flay you live."

"I shall leave you now, oh ye poor, poor man, for my boys and I have life. And while we have life, so ye shall have life, though it costs us all our lives. But lie here still and cry if thou wilt, for it does but make me cry. For my own I fight and for thine I fight, but for thee I only cry."

Posted by: FOTSGreg   2006-08-20 20:02  

#11  "The Islamic world is myopic, preferring to see everything in terms of victimhood, blame culture and some perceived injustice (however long ago). Even when Muslims are brought up in the West, there seems to be something in Islam that still brings this out"

It is called the university system. As long as higher education remains in the hands of the enemies of the Enlightenment, rationalism and the West it is hardly surprising the people our academic elites sanctify as victims should accept their chosen role. That said, their own supremicist ideology and the prospects of booty and rapine probably help convince them of their chances.

"A bomb for every madrassa" as a friend of mine puts it.

Posted by: Flea   2006-08-20 13:17  

#10  I can't resist posting this latest "they hate us; they hate us," shriek. I have been to Maine, and I don't remember hearing this kind of whine
Posted by: Snease Shaiting3550   2006-08-20 12:37  

#9  Right on the money djohn66. The Islamic world is myopic, preferring to see everything in terms of victimhood, blame culture and some perceived injustice (however long ago). Even when Muslims are brought up in the West, there seems to be something in Islam that still brings this out - witness the pathetic, veiled threat from our Muslim MPs and 'community leaders' about further attacks if Britain doesn't address 'root causes' and change its foreign policy. If it's the case that even when Muslims are brought up in the West, they revert to the crap we hear from the Middle East, then Islam itself is in serious trouble.

Everything that's been done by the West since 9/11 has given the Islamic world more time to sort themselves out. That they haven't done so (or even attempted to really) speaks volumes.

Ralph Peters says some weird things at times, but for my money he's right on the ball this time. Time is running out, and not enough people in the Islamic world realise it enough to do something about it (or in the case of the poison dwarf Ahmadinejad, they're actively talking up Armageddon).

It's T-2, and I'm getting a bit edgy, but I'm reminded of GWB's words "it will end at a time and place of our choosing". Hope he's as good a poker player as people think he is...
Posted by: Tony (UK)   2006-08-20 12:31  

#8  Hisb'allah's, like the Tet offensive, was a physical mauling but a political victory. Unfortunately it is the type of victory that matters to the chattering classes.
Posted by: Fordesque   2006-08-20 12:22  

#7  I agree John, that too.
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-08-20 12:02  

#6  My take on what he is saying is that because the west is trying to give muzzies every chance in the world to become civilized and everytime they throw it back in our face that the west is beginning to get tired of it and their excuses.
Posted by: djohn66   2006-08-20 12:00  

#5  Frank... I could be wrong, but what I believe Peters is saying is Israel's "misjudgement" and the IDF withdrawl was the "defeat." They were clear winners on the battlefield. If the bully goes down, you must keep him down. Failing to do so only angers and emboldens him.
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-08-20 11:51  

#4  Peters must be two people, because he can be brilliant, and then again...an idiot.

A postmodern terrorist army - Hezbollah's - just achieved the first terrorist defeat of a powerful state on a conventional battlefield.


the only victory Hezb can claim is survival and some political gains. Look at the infrastructure of So. Lebanon and tell me that's victory. Asshat
Posted by: Frank G   2006-08-20 11:43  

#3   while allowing a Homeland threat to develop?

Donk speak! Blaming Bush is Donk Speak! If you are a westerner, the term "mideast ally" is an oxymoron, something akin to French pal or Russian integrity.
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-08-20 10:56  

#2  Ralph Peters illustrates the folly of declaring defeat by remote control. Relying on CNN, he knows nothing about the extent of destruction of Hizbollah infrastructure in south Lebanon. Israel achieved every objective, except destroying all the missile launchers. And how realistic was that, given the ease in hiding these?

A couple of weeks ago, Condi Rice talked about a US-Sunni Arab challenge to Shiite power. It was odd, because the US is close to Iraqi Shiites. Bush would be well aware that last week, Iran launched joint attacks with Turkey on Kurd frontier cities.

Unless the US destroys Shiite power, it will retain only Israel as a Middle East ally. Why would Bush proclaim "pre-emption" as central to US military doctrine, while allowing a Homeland threat to develop? White House conduct is incomprehensible unless one infers that the "hour of our chosing" that GWB noted in his National Cathedral Speech in 2001, is near. September could either be one of the best months in US history; or worst. The choice is that of the President.

Posted by: Snease Shaiting3550   2006-08-20 10:43  

#1  The longer this war goes on the worst it gets for muzzies and if a big one hits, people will start talking genocide, it can get that bad.
Posted by: djohn66   2006-08-20 10:41  

00:00