You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
New Tests for Liquid Explosives Revealed
2006-08-29

Potential attacks on aircraft could be more easily detected thanks to a new test for hydrogen peroxide, one of the liquids that have sparked dramatic security clampdowns at airports around the world. Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, US, say that a test they developed to help diagnose diseases in the human body could be adapted to detect the chemical precursors of homemade explosives.

UK authorities recently uncovered an alleged plot to blow up aircraft using homemade explosives produced on board using chemicals such as hydrogen peroxide. Similar homemade explosives were used in the London subway bombings last year, which killed over 50 people. The explosives triacetone triperoxide (TATP) and hexamethylene triperoxide diamine, (HMTD) can be made using hydrogen peroxide and other chemicals. But airport screening devices are not able to detect hydrogen peroxide directly. In the wake of arrests associated with the recent plot, airport security guards have prevented liquids and gels from being taken on board flights and many airlines have continued the ban.

White powder

The new test uses a class of chemical compounds called "Peroxysensors" which were designed to detect hydrogen peroxide, which is generated in cells that are undergoing oxidative stress from ageing and ageing-related diseases. Christopher Chang, a chemist at UC Berkeley, says his group developed the compounds for basic research into oxidative stress. "When we saw a lot of these terrorist explosive mixtures contain peroxides and other molecules that are similar, we made the link and saw that this technique could be applicable," Chang says.

The new sensors are based on fluorescein, a dye that glows under ultraviolet light. But the fluorescein has been modified by having boronates attached to the molecule. This changes it from a fluorescent dye into a white powder that does not fluoresce. However, when it reacts with hydrogen peroxide the boronates are stripped off and the molecule becomes fluorescent again. It can be made to glow yellow or red. Chang says that paper test strips coated with Peroxysensors could be dipped in suspicious liquids. They could also be made to detect more than one kind of peroxide, so that innocent liquids that might have trace amounts of household hydrogen peroxide could be distinguished from other liquids.

Blue to yellow

Another test using a different chemical was recently developed at by Allen Apblett and other chemists at Oklahoma State University in Stillwater, US. In this case, the test is a spin-off from a method they developed to neutralise explosives made with hydrogen peroxide. The researchers made a material called "molybdenum blue" by mixing molybdic oxide with n-butanol and hydrochloric acid. When mixed with a peroxide-based explosive, molybdenum blue breaks it down into its harmless chemical constituents. In the process, molybdenum blue also changes from dark blue to pale yellow.

Apblett says he and his colleagues have developed a test strip using the molybdenum blue that will change colour when dipped in a solution with the high level of peroxides that would be needed for bomb-making.But Ivan Oelrich, head of the Strategic Security Project at the Federation of American Scientists in Washington DC, says that the new techniques will only work once security personnel have found a suspicious substance.

"With any of these schemes, you have to think through how you are going to use them. Airport screeners are not going to be using droppers to put liquids into test tubes. It has to be fast, almost 100% automated, and have a very small false alarm rate," he says.
Posted by:Zenster

#10  Skidmark, that is the fear. Two Rusiian airliners were said to have been blown out of the sky with just that tactic.
Posted by: ed   2006-08-29 23:18  

#9  I wouldn't want to mix any peroxide explosive ingedients on a plane. The flash fire from the runaway thermal reaction will burn the heck out of the mixer, but unlikely to go kaboom.
Posted by: ed   2006-08-29 23:16  

#8  No one to speak to 'the brides of allah' that carry it inside?
Posted by: Skidmark   2006-08-29 23:04  

#7  In that case, detecting the stuff that's used to make the stuff that goes boom is a directly useful thing to do.

Exactly, lotp. Plus, the test specifically identifies high-concentration peroxide, not hair coloring. Additionally, the test is as simple as checking pool water with a strip of litmus paper. This is really important as no baggage inspector can afford to whip out a Junior Meth Lab™ chemistry kit for every alert.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-08-29 20:11  

#6  a method they developed to neutralise explosives made with hydrogen peroxide

Hydrogen peroxide?

Exploding Hair?



Christina Aguilera is in trouble.
Posted by: BigEd   2006-08-29 19:27  

#5  zen & Ptah, I think the TATP can be mixed on board the aircraft if the peroxide is brought in separately from the other pre-mixed ingredients. IIUC that is what the plot in Britain was intending to do.

In that case, detecting the stuff that's used to make the stuff that goes boom is a directly useful thing to do.
Posted by: lotp   2006-08-29 19:01  

#4  No more Mentos and Cola light...grmpfff
Posted by: Hupeaque Shaviter5476   2006-08-29 17:38  

#3  This is clearly the suggestion of someone with too little money in their pockets suggesting that those pockets be the end destination of money recklessly thrown at peripheral problems by politicians desperate to appear "INVOLVED".

Ptah, read the fine print carefully.

Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, US, say that a test they developed to help diagnose diseases in the human body could be adapted to detect the chemical precursors of homemade explosives.


Another test using a different chemical was recently developed at by Allen Apblett and other chemists at Oklahoma State University in Stillwater, US. In this case, the test is a spin-off from a method they developed to neutralise explosives made with hydrogen peroxide.

Both of these detection techniques are side-cars to ongoing research. While the second application does come from investigations into explosives neutralization, both methods evolved as off-shoots of primary research and not the featherbed TSA projects you portray them to be.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-08-29 14:49  

#2  The explosives triacetone triperoxide (TATP) and hexamethylene triperoxide diamine, (HMTD) can be made using hydrogen peroxide and other chemicals. But airport screening devices are not able to detect hydrogen peroxide directly.

Hmph. You're not detecting the actual stuff that goes boom, but the stuff that's used to MAKE the stuff that goes boom. NOT the same thing.

This is clearly the suggestion of someone with too little money in their pockets suggesting that those pockets be the end destination of money recklessly thrown at peripheral problems by politicians desperate to appear "INVOLVED".
Posted by: Ptah   2006-08-29 14:22  

#1  Right. How to use them. Given what I read above, liquids will be banned for a long time.
Posted by: Bobby   2006-08-29 06:14  

00:00