You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Governor calls teacher's theories crazy as UNH stands behind 9/11 prof
2006-08-30
University of New Hampshire administrators are standing behind a tenured professor who has publicly theorized that the U.S. government orchestrated the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, even as Gov. John Lynch condemned his remarks. Calling psychology professor William Woodward's theory "completely crazy and offensive," the governor said in a statement yesterday that he plans to address his concerns with the University System of New Hampshire Board of Trustees. "Although academic freedom is important," the governor said, "if the UNH professor is promoting that view, it reflects a reckless disregard for the true facts and raises questions as to why such a professor would be teaching at the university in the first place."

Woodward is a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, an organization that maintains the Bush administration permitted the terrorist attacks to occur, and may even have planned them, so as to rally the public around its policies. Woodward has discussed the theory in his classroom and has said he hopes to teach a new class that would explore Sept. 11 "in psychological terms."

Andy Lietz, chairman of the system's Board of Trustees, said he asked university administrators to review Woodward's comments in the classroom. He maintained, however, that Woodward may belong to any organization he chooses, and that he may present controversial material so long as he does it responsibly. "I think he's absolutely wrong, and I'm disappointed that he would have those positions," Lietz said. "But he's an individual, and he has a right to have positions, as you and I have a right to have positions."

In a statement yesterday, the university's interim president, J. Bonnie Newman, said UNH encourages "the open inquiry of ideas."

"For me," Newman said, "there is no doubt that this tragic incident was the result of terrorists who had one objective in mind: to destroy the United States of America, the freedoms we enjoy and the principles that guide our democracy." However, she said, "Among those principles is freedom of speech."

A similar controversy swirled in Wisconsin earlier this month, when legislators there called on the public university system to fire Professor Kevin Barrett, also a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth. Barrett retained his job and is teaching a course on Islam this fall. Scholars for 9/11 Truth claims to have 300 members nationwide. Its founder and co-chairman, retired University of Minnesota-Duluth Professor James H. Fetzer, said about 75 of those members have "academic affiliations." Woodward's critics, Fetzer said, are "arrogant in their ignorance."

"Of course, all of us have difficulty imagining our government could have attacked our own government," he said. "But do you know there are an awful lot of people who have paid attention to the evidence that are coming around?"

Fetzer's writings dispute the conclusions of the Sept. 11 Commission, whose 2004 report clearly states that the attacks were carried out by Islamic extremists under the leadership of Osama Bin Laden. Fetzer argues the hijacked planes could not have destroyed the World Trade Center. Among other claims, he says several of the suspected hijackers have turned up "alive and well."

"Virtually every aspect of the government's position on 9/11 is provably false," Fetzer said. Woodward also is a member of New Hampshire Peace Action and other anti-war organizations. In May, he and five other demonstrators were charged with criminal trespassing during an anti-war protest at U.S. Rep. Jeb Bradley's office in Dover.

In an op-ed in Foster's Daily Democrat last month, Woodward accused Israel of committing "atrocities" against the Palestinians and labeled the U.S. as "directly complicit." "The U.S. should stop support of Israel until it returns its 10,000 kidnapped victims, withdraws from settlements, and pays reparations," Woodward wrote in a piece published July 28.
Posted by:Fred

#18  What about 'academic competence'?

The phrase is rapidly becoming an oxymoron. Or in Woodwrd's case, just a regular moron.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-08-30 20:12  

#17  my structural calculations are constantly criticized by sociology and philosophy experts. I hate it
Posted by: Frank G   2006-08-30 19:20  

#16  Third. And the motion carries.
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-08-30 15:12  

#15  I second that nomination.
Posted by: lotp   2006-08-30 14:49  

#14  Bobby: Leave it to a philosophy professor to catch a bunch of engineers lying about verifiable structural engineering facts.

I think Bobby might take the 'understated snark of the week' trophy away from Trailing Wife this week ....
Posted by: Steve White   2006-08-30 14:43  

#13  "but we're talking about the basic facts of 9/11 in the sense that to believe or espouse otherwise is ludicrous".

mcsegeek1, I could be wrong but I don’t believe the “9/11 Report” is considered to be just another “government report”. Either way, if some people wish to believe all the “basic facts” regarding 9/11 have been established…great. But keep in mind some of those “facts” as well as a number of “conclusions and recommendations” are based on the testimony of people like Sandy Berger and Richard Clark. I don’t support the fantastic theories floating about but believe people are justified in questioning the “official” story line.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2006-08-30 14:42  

#12  rationality and being delusion-free are, in fact, bona fide job requirements.
Posted by: Mark E.   2006-08-30 14:09  

#11  James H. Fetzer, Distinguished McKnight University Professor Emeritus, University of Minnesota Duluth, Department of Philosophy,
University of Minnesota

Fetzer argues the hijacked planes could not have destroyed the World Trade Center.

Right. Leave it to a philosophy professor to catch a bunch of engineers lying about verifiable structural engineering facts.

Whilst I am but a mere civil engineer - as opposed to a registered professional structral engineer, I was not the least bit surprised when the towers "pancaked", and my initial impression of the cause was correct.

The intense heat softened the steel until it yielded (bent) and overstreesed some other structural memeber (thing) to failure (it broke). When the parts of the steel holding up the floor bent and broke, the concrete floor collaped on the floor below, causing it to crash down on the one below. Repeat to the lowest level.

There. Ya think a philosophy professor can understand that? Probably, but he won't believe it.

Posted by: Bobby   2006-08-30 13:41  

#10  "a number of “facts” from the official “9/11 Commission Report” have been called into question, others refuted, and some proven to be false. "

Aw, c'mon DepotGuy. Of course some facts are later proven to be innaccurate. Show me a government report where this is not the case. 'Called into question'? By whom, and for what reason? Lots of things get called into question, but are all questions and questioners credible? Hell, I could 'call into question' the fact that the earth is a spherical planet, insist it's flat, and have a huge following of nutjobs that agree with me (yes the flat earth society does exist), but we're talking about the basic facts of 9/11 in the sense that to believe or espouse otherwise is ludicrous. We are not talking about the insignificant details. And we're also not talking about 'intellectual dishonesty'. If we were talking about a debate over 'global warming', I'd agree that some are being intellectually dishonest in their conclusions. That's a far cry from espousing flat earth, we never went to the moon, Bush blew up the towers, etc.

Ludicrous:
1 : amusing or laughable through obvious absurdity, incongruity, exaggeration, or eccentricity.
2 : meriting derisive laughter or scorn as absurdly inept, false, or foolish.
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-08-30 12:23  

#9  Â“Spewing garbage in direct contradiction of known and verified fact…”

With all due respect T.Redneck, a number of “facts” from the official “9/11 Commission Report” have been called into question, others refuted, and some proven to be false. With that said, “The Scholars for 9/11 Truth” proves itself to be an intellectually dishonest bunch every time they interject their Anti-NeoCon/Bush/Republican/Illumitaty/War/(fill in the blank) to bolster their unproven conclusions.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2006-08-30 11:48  

#8  "Administrators continue to raise the 'freedom of speech' argument to protect their moonbat profs. That misses the entire point. What about 'academic competence'? In state funded schools, the state has a right to demand that the teachers are competent."

Exactly! He is free to think and say whatever he wants. He is also free to suffer the consequences of speaking his mind out loud.

The Administrators, Trustees', Alumni, parents etc. etc. should be moving to set him and every other moonbat faculty member adrift. Tenured or not. This Academic Freedom and PC bull crap has got to go.

Spewing garbage in direct contradiction of known and verified fact, has nothing to do with Academic Freedom. Find this idiot a rubber room somewhere.

Posted by: Texas Redneck   2006-08-30 10:22  

#7  Too bad Larry Summers wasn't president of UNH instead of Harvard. He might still have a job.
Oh, wait. That was the wrong kind of speech. Freedom of Speech don't cover that...
Academics are the biggest hypocrites in this country.
Posted by: tu3031   2006-08-30 10:15  

#6  Administrators continue to raise the 'freedom of speech' argument to protect their moonbat profs. That misses the entire point. What about 'academic competence'? In state funded schools, the state has a right to demand that the teachers are competent.
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-08-30 09:34  

#5  So when is the university going to support 'academic freedom' and establish chairs to be filled by 'tenured professors' who advocate return to the monarchy and to slavery?
Posted by: Sleting Ebbager4513   2006-08-30 09:08  

#4  Don't forget that his students (and their parents) are paying for an education. Not to hear a tenured professor bray at the moon.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2006-08-30 07:02  

#3  This sort of speech shouldn't be a problem. The real problem is that this person receives money extorted from Americans.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2006-08-30 05:29  

#2  The ability to distinguish between free speech and barking mad moonbattery looks like a growth industry. To say that everyone here at the 'Burg is much smarter than J. Bonnie Newman, the "dipshit in charge" at UNH, is obvious.

Let's commit her to a nice state institution and use her salary to allow Fred to retire - and fund future Rantapaloozas.
Posted by: flyover   2006-08-30 04:13  

#1  Woodward is a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, an organization that maintains the Bush administration permitted the terrorist attacks to occur, and may even have planned them performs the role of "flypaper" for the lunatics that somehow managed to make it through the higher education system without getting caught.
Posted by: gorb   2006-08-30 04:05  

00:00