You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Bolton: Iran's Goal is a Bomb
2006-09-02
Iran's violation of yesterday's U.N. deadline to halt its nuclear program leaves no doubt that its goal is to build atomic bombs, U.S. Ambassador John Bolton charged. He said the U.N. Security Council must be ready to impose sanctions on Iran for its nose-thumbing response to the rest of the world. "There's simply no explanation for the range of Iranian behavior which we've seen over the years other than that they're pursuing a weapons capability," Bolton said. He added that the Security Council didn't have to be unanimous in taking action - meaning China and Russia might not be able to veto a strong U.N. stand.

Bolton's tough words came after Iran's president vowed "never" to back down in its showdown with world powers over its nuclear program. "The Iranian nation will not accept for one moment any bullying, invasion and violation of its rights," Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said.
There you have it, in black and white. Bolton says they're working toward a bomb. It takes a willful suspension of disbelief to avoid coming to that conclusion. Nejad sez "ain't nobuddy tellz us what to do!"

The Euros (and the Russers) can talk, blather, convolute, and try and sweeten the Danegeld, but those are the two positions. If they were on the same side as us, their actions wouldn't make any sense. But since they regard both the U.S. and Iran as potential threats, triangulation between the two sides makes sense, at least to them.

I think we've pretty well got this lineup down now. That's why we'll end up going with "unilateral" sanctions. And we won't be surprised when the Euros oppose us and sell their technology to the enemy when we go to war with Iran.
Posted by:Fred

#9  Iran doesn't want "A" bomb, but "lots" of bombs. The time to target and hit them is now, before they move forward. Use nice, dirty nukes that will leave the areas uninhabitable for 10,000 years, so they won't be able to retrieve anything that isn't totally destroyed. If you can't play nice with the big boys, expect to have your teeth handed to you in a paper bag.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2006-09-02 18:15  

#8  I agree with you anonymous5089. The words of the man himself.

"Europeans will be responsible for any event in the region and they will be harmed first," he said without giving details.

From Iranfocus.com July 13 2006
Posted by: Gladys   2006-09-02 16:43  

#7  #2 FA - according to Ahma-nutjob, their first and foremost target is Israel.

And if a bunch of Arabs get killed too, so what? Iran is Persian.

Ahma-nutjob knows he doesn't have to actually drop a bomb on the EUnichs - just threaten them with one and they'll fall all over each other to be the first to help destroy America kiss his ass.

Then they'll wonder why their economies tank and their "Asian" and "North African" conquerors immigrants rise up and start killing infidels.

And they'll still blame America and the Joooooos.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2006-09-02 16:19  

#6  Iran's goal is "AllahBooom Akhbar" and the pathetic EU response further strengthen its faith in it.
Posted by: Duh!   2006-09-02 15:42  

#5  The EUnuchs believe that they are not the target.

IMHO, Europe is the prize/prey/target, the USA are the ennemy.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2006-09-02 15:36  

#4  The USA will have to find a path forward that does not depend on "allies" like these.

Word, SR-71. "Unilateral" no longer means "one-sided". It simply means "sane".
Posted by: Zenster   2006-09-02 15:33  

#3  Please don't forget that we are in range of a freighter carrying an Iranian bomb. The EUnuchs believe that they are not the target. They are probably correct - they are not the primary target, but they will be a secondary target if they ever resist dhimmitude. The Euros are an enemy of the USA.

The Russians want a rematch after loosing the Cold War. The Chinese are already in a low grade conflict with us, and thus benefit from Mooslim vandalism of the West.

The USA will have to find a path forward that does not depend on "allies" like these.

As an aside, the we need to cut off any further military aid to the other countries of NATO. If they want to go to Afghanistan with nerf bats, so it goes. And no further resources to the UN - we will need them for own survival.
Posted by: SR-71   2006-09-02 14:02  

#2  Iran's goal is not a bomb. Their goal is to drop a bomb.

And since Europe is in range, but the US is not, guess who's the most likely target.

Al
Posted by: Frozen Al   2006-09-02 13:36  

#1  Not trying to keep repeating myself, but the Euros response, more than any of the others, is entirely irresponsible. After 2 1/2 years of EU-3/Iran talking, etc. etc.

We are to blame as well. We keep giving military defense candy to the indulging Euros.
Posted by: Captain America   2006-09-02 11:12  

00:00