You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Teddy and Unknown Say Bush Speech 'Political'
2006-09-12
President Bush is invoking the memory of Sept. 11 to defend the war in Iraq, drawing protests from Democrats who say he politicized a national day of mourning.

In a prime-time speech broadcast on Monday's anniversary of the terror attacks, the president described a brutal enemy still determined to kill Americans, perhaps with weapons of mass destruction if they get the chance. "If we do not defeat these enemies now, we will leave our children to face a Middle East overrun by terrorist states and radical dictators armed with nuclear weapons," Bush said. "We are in a war that will set the course for this new century and determine the destiny of millions across the world."

His address came at the end of a day in which he visited New York, Pennsylvania and the Pentagon to honor victims of the attacks that rocked his presidency and thrust the United States into a costly and unfinished war against terror.

Bush began with a two-minute tribute to the "nearly 3,000" victims of the Sept. 11 attacks, but most of his 17-minute speech was devoted to justifying his foreign policy since that day. With his party's control of Congress at stake in elections less than two months away, Bush suggested that political opponents who are calling for withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq would be giving victory to the terrorists.
And who 'suggests' otherwise? He didn't 'suggest' it; he stated it, as if it were a fact.
"Whatever mistakes have been made in Iraq, the worst mistake would be to think that if we pulled out, the terrorists would leave us alone," Bush said from the Oval Office, with a photo of his twin daughters and the American flag behind him. "They will not leave us alone. They will follow us. The safety of America depends on the outcome of the battle in the streets of Baghdad."
But the WoT and Iraq are not linked?
While Democrats have been using public opposition to the Iraq war to argue for a change of leadership in Congress, Bush's prime-time address showed how he has been able to use the power of incumbency to command public attention and make his points. Democrats objected to the tone.

"The president should be ashamed of using a national day of mourning to commandeer the airwaves to give a speech that was designed not to unite the country and commemorate the fallen but to seek support for a war in Iraq that he has admitted had nothing to do with 9/11," Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., said in a statement.
I swore there was a picture of Teddy in the photo archives.... "
There will be time to debate this president's policies in Iraq. September 11th is not that time."

Earlier Monday, dozens of lawmakers from both parties put aside the campaigning and joined on the steps of the Capitol to remember the attacks. Together they sang "God Bless America" as they had five years ago. "Partisanship would have been the one casualty the American people would have accepted following 9/11, but it remains the one thing the president refuses to give up," Illinois Rep. Rahm Emanuel, chairman of the Democratic effort to win control of the House, said after the president's speech.

Bush said Iraq is part of the United States' post-Sept. 11 approach to threats abroad. Going on offense against enemies before they could harm Americans meant removing the Taliban from power in Afghanistan, pursuing members of al-Qaida and seeking regime change in Iraq, Bush said. At least 2,670 U.S. servicemen and women have died in Iraq.

"I am often asked why we are in Iraq when Saddam Hussein was not responsible for the 9/11 attacks," Bush said. "The answer is that the regime of Saddam Hussein was a clear threat.

"America did not ask for this war, and every American wishes it were over. So do I," Bush said. "But the war is not over, and it will not be over until either we or the extremists emerge victorious."

Although his administration has been criticized for trying to link Osama bin Laden to Baghdad, Bush made further comparisons between the al-Qaida leader and Iraq. The president quoted bin Laden as saying the battle in Iraq is the "Third World War" that could bring America's "defeat and disgrace forever."

"If we yield Iraq to men like bin Laden," Bush said, "our enemies will be emboldened, they will gain a new safe haven, and they will use Iraq's resources to fuel their extremist movement. We will not allow this to happen."

Bush delivered a message to bin Laden and other terrorists who are still on the run. "No matter how long it takes, America will find you, and we will bring you to justice," Bush said.
Posted by:Bobby

#5  "I'm all for partisanship. Lib Moonbats are an enemy, that if given the chance, would destroy my very way of life. I'm about as partisan about that as you can get."

Exactly.

I have a now ex-friend leftist who in a heated discussion asked me why those of us from the center to the right are so obstinate and fight so hard for our principles, and are so fearful of him and his fellow travellers. I explained to him that we had nowhere to go if we couldn't live our life here in America, and his crowd were literally trying to legislate or litigate everyone like me out of existence.

He replied that he just wanted to live in a society that matched his ideals. I pointed out to him that a) nearly all of what he wanted to do he could right here, if in a private rather than government fashion and b) there already was an entire continent - Europe - where he could live EXACTLY the way he wanted to, and it would be an easy task to simply move there and let me live like a real American here. I would have no objections and I don't mind having lots of countries with systems which allow people to vote with their feet, moving to a place that suits them. I'm not threatened by this, as long as said countries do not pose a threat to my life. And I certainly recognize that societies like Europe's - which is identical to what our nation would be if the Dems got their way on most issues - are no threat to a society like ours in the economic realm.

Then I pointed out that folks like me do NOT have a similar option, and that victory of his crowd would result in a sort of philosophical genocide of true-thread American culture.

I told him that he did NOT in fact simply want to live "his way." What his crowd wants is for there to be NO place on the planet where the descendant memes of the American Revolution hold sway, and wipe my 'evil' way of life out, permanently. They want to FORCE everyone on the planet to live in a society like France or Scandinavia, and make things like firearm freedom and free market capitalism outlaw activities.

He spluttered an angry reply which was largely an accusation that neanderthals like myself are the cause of all the problems in the world, which would be perfect if we'd only see and do things his way, and like, racism and sexism and poverty, 'n' stuff.

Like I said, ex-friend.

So yeah, those of us in the center and on the right are tolerant, in the truest sense, with you if you want to be a vegan, or an evangelical atheist who continuously spouts contempt for Christians, or piss all YOUR money (not mine taken in the form of taxes) away giving it to people who don't deserve it, or have sex with someone of whichever gender, or write articles about how much you hate capitalism and distrust business, or be a ridiculous pacifist in your day to day living, or decide you'll never own a gun. Not always agreeing, perhaps, but tolerant.

The left, on the otherhand, treats anyone who deviates even slightly from their big government/collectivist/celebrate moral entropy/extreme pacifism agenda as having committed mortal sin. (See Joe Lieberman.) They would grin as they outlawed then utterly wiped out much of what is traditionally American and then go home and maturbate to the thought what they had done that evening. "Live and let live" hasn't been part of their way for decades. They figure they have an absolute right to demonize and tax and regulate us, and we have no rights other than to always be polite, roll over and let them take our guns and tax us to death.

If the Repubs were simply to point out the FACT that the LLL's largely want everyone in the America to live just like the extinction-bound EUros do now, they'll croak the Dems forever. It can't be that hard to get that point across.
Posted by: no mo uro   2006-09-12 20:37  

#4  #3 tu: "So wht did Teddy do last night in memoriam, have a drink for every one of the victims?"

Isn't that what he does every night?
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2006-09-12 18:58  

#3  So wht did Teddy do last night in memoriam, have a drink for every one of the victims?
Yeah, that's different...
Posted by: tu3031   2006-09-12 17:12  

#2  I'm all for partisanship. Lib Moonbats are an enemy, that if given the chance, would destroy my very way of life. I'm about as partisan about that as you can get.
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-09-12 14:57  

#1  "Partisanship would have been the one casualty the American people would have accepted following 9/11, but it remains the one thing the president refuses to give up," Illinois Rep. Rahm Emanuel, chairman of the Democratic effort to win control of the House, said after the president's speech.

Honestly . . . is there anything I could say that could put it better than the way the author did? No matter what witty remark I make on the topic of irony, or stupidity, or doublethink, it won't top what was said there.
Posted by: The Doctor   2006-09-12 13:00  

00:00