You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Arm tribes to fight al-Qaeda, say Sunnis
2006-09-13
As MSM says all is lost in Anbar province, comes this....

SUNNI leaders in al-Anbar province, long a bastion of resistance to the American presence in Iraq, are urging the American military to arm tribes against al-Qaeda, which is viewed as the most powerful force in the area.
They believe that this is now the best way to bring peace to the province that includes the violence-plagued cities of Fallujah and Ramadi.

Resentment of al-Qaeda militants among tribes and other insurgent groups has erupted into violence periodically since spring 2005. Over the past year the anger has led to a permanent rift and constant fighting in the western province that borders Syria, Jordan and Saudi Arabia. “There is a struggle between people of al-Anbar province and some of the [militant] organisations working there, but the Americans are not taking seriously the people’s efforts to make peace,” said Ayad al-Samarrai, the No 2 official in the Islamic Party, the largest Iraqi Sunni party.

“When the Americans attack an area, they disarm the locals and keep them weak but the terrorists have already fled. When the Americans leave, the terrorists return and the people do not have any weapons to protect themselves.”

Mr Samarrai said that leaders from al-Anbar had made several proposals to the Americans, including arming the tribes to fight al-Qaeda, providing teams of bodyguards for tribal leaders, clerics and politicians who opposed al-Qaeda and making an intense recruitment push to build an indigenous army and police force.

Posted by:Captain America

#2  How about:
1. Put a high fence around the Arab Triangle and Basra province to keep them in and anyone else out.
2. Use the US military and the Kurds to police the wire. (2a. eliminate any Iranian or Syrian interference with extreme prejidice.)
3. Ship in all the small arms they can take.
4. Let them play until they're tired.

Two possible results:
The Muzzies learn that it isn't worth it, or -
No more Muzzies (like the Two Cats from Kilkenny.)
Posted by: SR-71   2006-09-13 08:14  

#1  Lordy, here we go again... The classic Arab blame game - anybody but themselves will do.

The problems in Iraq, AFAICS, are:

1) The Shia have squandered their opportunity to rise above asinine sectarian stupidity. Holding the majority and government power, they're stuck in payback mode - and mere toadies for...

2) Iran sees Iraq as an easy regime to subvert and convert into yet another asshat proxy. They've succeeded too, methinks - the Iraqi "government" is a tool - little different from the Lebs. This situation will continue until the Iranian regime is capped.

3) The Sunnis, in a nostalgic return-to-power bid to commit mass suicide, have embraced the snakes, foreign and domestic, and now, in the purrfekt Muzzy mold, don't like the results of their mindless choice. They are living proof, in that speshul Arab way, that it sucks to be terminally stupid.

4) Iraq's Sunni neighbors have used it to relieve themselves of their crops of idiots and troublemakers, a pressure valve using the imams and tuning the Friday message over time, and hoping against reality they'd succeed in restoring some Sunni power.

Were it not for the Kurds, bless 'em, I could easily post something that would some think I've swilled the DhimmiDonk Kool Aid. I didn't, but DAMN! it would be so easy and convenient to do. And that is a subtle but important fundafuckingmental difference, IMO, between the Dhimmis and and those who want us to succeed in the WoT... far too subtle for some, I fear.
Posted by: .com   2006-09-13 07:11  

00:00