You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Report urges Europe to cut armed forces
2006-10-02
Just when you thought the Y'urp-peon military couldn't become weaker and more irrelevant ...
LONDON - European nations have been urged to cut the size of their armed forces to take account of competition for young recruits from the private sector in a report that is expected to be endorsed by EU defence ministers on Tuesday, a newspaper said.
You'd think that on a continent with a core unemployment rate of 10 to 12 percent that 'competition' for young workers wouldn't be that strong.
MondayÂ’s edition of the Financial Times said the European Defence Agency document warned that the cost of personnel is expected to rise sharply in the next 20 years when the average European will be aged 45 and employers from the private sector will compete with the military to attract young recruits.
The downward spiral all comes together -- weak economies, below-replacement birthrates, bounding immigration, turning away from faith and hope, living for the moment -- Europe now simply won't, and can't, defend itself. One stiff breeze and it falls over.
It suggested greater outsourcing by the military to the private sector and the elimination of excess capacity. ‘Do Europeans between them really need nearly 10,000 main battle tanks and nearly 3,000 combat aircraft,’ the paper, seen by the FT, said. It was compiled to examine the defence challenges in two decades’ time.
That's not the question: it's not how many battle tanks or aircraft. It is, simply, what's the challenge to Europe? What must Europe do to defend itself and have the leadership role in the world that its leaders say they want to have? A Union that won't and can't defend itself will become irrelevant.
The report will be looked at by defence ministers at an informal meeting in Finland starting Monday, the newspaper said. It urges joint European operations in future to be ‘expeditionary, multinational and multi-instrumental’ directed at achieving security and stability more than ‘victory’.
There's a telling statement: 'victory' is too much a, well, American idea. Security and stability matter more if all you're doing is living for the moment.
The European Defence Agency was established under a Joint Action of the Council of Ministers on 12 July, 2004, ‘to support the Member States and the Council in their effort to improve European defence capabilities in the field of crisis management and to sustain the European Security and Defence Policy...’
The Euros already have a 'multinational' military. It's called, NATO. It certainly isn't expeditionary given the unwillingness of the Euros to go to places like Afghanistan and Lebanon. I have no idea what 'multi-instrumental' means and I bet the writer didn't know either, but it's a soothing buzzword for the defense ministers. They'll talk about an expeditionary force which will amount to whatever a few A400s can carry. They'll talk about being 'multi-instrumental' so that the rubes in the press corps will have something to write about. Then they'll spend on the money on their black holes of pension funds and national health insurance, and hope that the Fighting 514th Belgian Heavy Barbershoppers can save them.
Posted by:Steve White

#24  I know, why don't ranburgers make up the numbers and bring some europeans home.

Right wing Neo-cons and Muzzies fighting - hopefully you will take each other out.

Oh I forgot you need to be here writing pointless drivel. If you are that worried get yourself over to muzzieland and take some out, or do you think they will take you out...
Posted by: custer   2006-10-02 19:29  

#23  Actually, custer, I believe you missed the whole point. It's not about bringing some Europeans "home". It's about the forces at "home" and the future Muzzie battles at "home" in Europe. And it pains me to think that once again Americans are going to be called to rescue the innocents of Europe from another massive European mess. Have time for a carbeque before heading up to Little Bighorn, custer?
Posted by: Sitting Bull   2006-10-02 19:50  

#22  Lol.

Why don't you ask yourself, "Where'd all those fucking indians come from?"

Toddle off, winky, most of us have already served - something I'm sure you would know nothing about.
Posted by: .com   2006-10-02 19:44  

#21  
In today's Sinktrap, Custer provides us a valuable illustration of the importance of the autonomic nervous system: without it, some people would be too fucking stupid to breathe...
Posted by: custer   2006-10-02 19:29  

#20  Revised headline:
"Report Urges Europe to Cut Armed Forces, Convert to Islam"
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2006-10-02 16:37  

#19  Really, DB? I didn't know that. Pink berets too? I mean, we're talkin cotton candy pink.
Posted by: exJAG   2006-10-02 15:44  

#18  German tank crews have always worn pink piping. Black uniforms with pink piping.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2006-10-02 15:19  

#17  It is interesting that, during the Cold War, lots of "sophisticated" experts claimed stability was the key. Then this crazy cowboy named Ronald Reagan decided to go for victory. 10 years later the Soviet Bloc had disappeared.

Al
Posted by: Frozen Al   2006-10-02 14:24  

#16  German tank crews wear pink

Gott in Himmel!
Posted by: Guderian   2006-10-02 13:58  

#15  In fact, I wonder why a couple hundred armed jihadis don't just storm the EU "cockpit" in Brussels, and demand the keys to the kingdom. Maybe coordinate it with a few train bombings to show they really mean business. By the time the EUnuchs figured out what to do, it would be over, and Europe would belong to the Dar al-Islam. I can only guess that internal bickering is the only reason they don't go for it.

LOL! it hertz.
Posted by: RD   2006-10-02 13:37  

#14  Interesting observation & cmts ExJAG, thanks.
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-10-02 11:34  

#13  Spot, life in European militaries ain't that hard. German 19-year-olds have to do 12-18 months of compulsory military service (or they can opt for civil service in a hospital or something). My German ex-boyfriend and his younger brother went the military route, and spent that time drinking beer, watching porn, and generally goofing off. Had a blast. Biggest issue was the color coding on the epaulettes and berets -- these days, German tank crews wear pink. Kinda says it all.

As for Europe's future -- "one stiff breeze and it falls over" -- I couldn't agree more. In fact, I wonder why a couple hundred armed jihadis don't just storm the EU "cockpit" in Brussels, and demand the keys to the kingdom. Maybe coordinate it with a few train bombings to show they really mean business. By the time the EUnuchs figured out what to do, it would be over, and Europe would belong to the Dar al-Islam. I can only guess that internal bickering is the only reason they don't go for it.
Posted by: exJAG   2006-10-02 11:31  

#12  After Europe's next fall, the most likely scenario is another American bailout. Having saved Europe's ass repeatedly in the past, I'm afraid we're destined to do it again.

Oh, and we'll get about as much gratitude for it as we now enjoy.
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-10-02 11:29  

#11  All your Europe are belong to us!
Posted by: Islamofascists   2006-10-02 09:43  

#10  Those 10,000 tanks will come in handy during the final surrender and conversion to Islam. Nice gift to present their new masters.
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats   2006-10-02 09:09  

#9  ..So let me get this straight - having to compete with a smaller pool of applicants, instead of increasing pay and benefits they cut back on the number of people they need.

Brilliant.


Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2006-10-02 09:00  

#8  That core (corps?) of unemployed wouldn't join the military because they're on the dole - why take a job (and a tough one at that) when you can freeload?
US out of EUrope - now!
Posted by: Spot   2006-10-02 08:28  

#7  Demographically they could increase the size of the military and decrease unemployment and even decrease their Muslim immigrant worker rate if they actually made the unemployed and underemployed work for their supper. Plus, how much vacation do they get? I would like that kind of labor deal too, but it needs to be recognized that it comes with strings attached.
Posted by: Glenmore   2006-10-02 07:26  

#6  But tea parties are so much more fun than actually thinking and planning and stuff, Alaska Paul.

/No, of course I don't mean that. If I did, I wouldn't hang out at Rantburg. Fine. Let them fall to the barbarians then. We'll just have to recolonize the emptied Europe later, with the refugees that flee to our shores.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-10-02 06:49  

#5  Dr. Steve---Comments right on the mark. Europe needs to define the threats and needs w/r/t defense, then the military types, size, and all elso derives from the threats and needs. The rest of what they are doing now is just a bureaucrat's mad hatter's tea party.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2006-10-02 02:28  

#4  yrup
Posted by: Captain America   2006-10-02 00:41  

#3  Demographically, keeping their military the same size would involve depending more an more on their Asian minorities to fill out the enlisted ranks. I don't know that an Asian military trained in Europe would be a good idea.
Posted by: Super Hose   2006-10-02 00:37  

#2  The age-old question is answered...
a whimper
Posted by: .com   2006-10-02 00:16  

#1  We are the hollow men
We are the stuffed men
Leaning together
Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!
Our dried voices, when
We whisper together
Are quiet and meaningless
As wind in dry grass
Or rats' feet over broken glass
In our dry cellar

Shape without form, shade without colour,
Paralysed force, gesture without motion;,,,

This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper.


T. S. Elliot, The Hollow Men
Posted by: RWV   2006-10-02 00:14  

00:00