You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Rwanda suspects on UN genocide panel
2006-10-16
THE tribunal established by the UN to prosecute the leaders of the 1994 Rwandan genocide has been plunged into renewed controversy by claims that up to a dozen Rwandans accused of genocide crimes were on its payroll. The allegations were made to the UN General Assembly by Joseph Nsengimana, Rwanda's envoy.
Everard O'Donnell, the tribunal's spokesman and registrar, dismissed Rwanda's claim as politically motivated. While he acknowledged up to a dozen genocide suspects had been on the payroll, he said they had never been employed as tribunal staff, but had worked on defence teams for various accused.
They were reiterated by Martin Ngoga, the country's prosecutor-general when he produced a list of suspects, saying several of them featured on Rwanda's list of 100 most wanted figures in the genocide.

Mr Nsengimana said his Government last month told the Security Council that 14 well-known "genocide suspects" were employed by the tribunal. Ten had since resigned and he said the tribunal must "expeditiously resolve that very serious issue, including by making public the report of the independent investigation and following thatup with arrests and prosecutions". Everard O'Donnell, the tribunal's spokesman and registrar, dismissed Rwanda's claim as politically motivated. While he acknowledged up to a dozen genocide suspects had been on the payroll, he said they had never been employed as tribunal staff, but had worked on defence teams for various accused.
Posted by:Fred

#8  The US State Dept. has always suffered from Stockholm syndrome.
Posted by: DMFD   2006-10-16 23:41  

#7  Lol. They certainly aren't working for us and, from our POV, a more (otherwise) useless bunch of tools is hard to imagine, no? It's that damned quid pro quo thingy that worries...
Posted by: .com   2006-10-16 23:24  

#6  Oh, they're not really in charge. They've just generously agreed to fund the State employees' retirement plans.
Posted by: Pappy   2006-10-16 21:51  

#5  Just askin' ....
Posted by: lotp   2006-10-16 19:05  

#4  They aren't??
Posted by: lotp   2006-10-16 19:05  

#3  If our government were run like the UN, the Gambino family would be in charge of the FBI.

And the Sauds would be in charge of State.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-10-16 19:04  

#2  If our government were run like the UN, the Gambino family would be in charge of the FBI.
Posted by: DMFD   2006-10-16 18:57  

#1  YJCMTSU!
Posted by: Zenster   2006-10-16 00:44  

00:00