You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Censoring Iraq
2006-10-22
Why are there so few reporters with American troops in combat? Don't blame the media.
by Michael Yon
Posted by:Fred

#10  I've followed Yon's reporting. He seems to be a credible guy. He wants more access to the military and isn't getting it. He says censorship exists and that is not good. However...

The military has been burned by the press too many times. The reporting by the press (MSM) is very slanted and often untruthful, e.g. New York Times, Associated Press, etc.

Moreover, where does Yon get the idea that the news coming from a hot zone isn't censored? During WW II, the news was screened and censored. It has only been recently that censorship has been lessened. That has been a disaster. Cronkite torpedoed American efforts in Vietnam to support the agenda of a leftish press. Recently, CNN published "snuff" videos of an American soldier being killed by terrorist snipers and for what purpose other than attract viewers and to support an agenda? Yon should not be so naive. What does he want to report that he isn't reporting now?
Posted by: JohnQC   2006-10-22 23:20  

#9  This shit-for-brains has undoubtedly been talking to village "elders." The conspirants. Over the winter months, when they hole up, they round up a whole new mob of simpletons willing to venture forth in "mass attacks " in the springtime. This may have worked a couple hundred years ago. With airpower and abundant firepower on call this ain't gonna happen. Just have to wipe out the entire village, along with conspirants. It's really time to start taking the gloves off. Who better to use as an example than these dupes ?
Posted by: SpecOp35   2006-10-22 13:28  

#8  Yes, indeed, those with a higher calling and infinitely more sophistication... "We're here to rebuild this country for the poor little brown people... They will love us for it, of course."
Posted by: .com   2006-10-22 11:36  

#7  Especially if the base is manned primarily by Europeans who are unwilling to really engage in combat.
Posted by: lotp   2006-10-22 11:26  

#6  Dien Bien Phu... Khe San... Big PR magik.

This would probably dissolve the tenuous commitment to NATO by most everyone, if it isn't a US base.
Posted by: .com   2006-10-22 11:25  

#5  Well, thanks to Pervy, it seems they have the fodder, a perfectly safe haven to plan it, Spring gives them time to accumulate sufficient numbers, and an open border. So a mass attack on some small base should be workable. If they don't care about casualties (why start now), then they could pull it off.
Posted by: .com   2006-10-22 11:22  

#4  While the whole article was interesting, I read it for Yon's bloodbath prediction:

Early this spring, when I reported from Afghan farms about this year's bumper opium crop, people thought I was using that opium. Now it is common knowledge that the opium trade is fueling a Taliban comeback. Mark this on your calendar: Spring of 2007 will be a bloodbath in Afghanistan for NATO forces. Our British, Canadian, Australian, Dutch, and other allies will be slaughtered in Afghanistan if they dare step off base in the southern provinces, and nobody is screaming at the tops of their media-lungs about the impending disaster. I would not be surprised to see a NATO base overrun in Afghanistan in 2007 with all the soldiers killed or captured. And when it happens, how many will claim they had no idea it was so bad and blame the media for failing to raise the alarm? Here it is: WARNING! Troops in Afghanistan are facing slaughter in 2007!

Obviously this is serious stuff. Does anyone know why Yon believes this to be the case? He warns but does not elaborate on his reasons for believing the situation is going to be so dire in spring 2007.
Posted by: Flea   2006-10-22 11:02  

#3  To clarify my post above, Mr. Yon is predicting a NATO bloodbath in Afghanistan in the srping of 2007.
Posted by: Mark Z   2006-10-22 09:17  

#2  I've come to trust Mr. Yon as a serious commentator on the war. What I found most disturbing in this artilce is Mr. Yon's prediction of a NATO bloodbath in the spring of 2007. Chilling.
Posted by: Mark Z   2006-10-22 09:05  

#1  Oh dear.

This really is the heart of the matter.

We really need to win the media war: we have unparallelled military might but what good is that when you can't use it because the PR battle is lost.

I hope the Pentagon starts discussing this properly!
Posted by: anon1   2006-10-22 01:30  

00:00