You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa Horn
Bush gets "grim" report on Darfur, weighs new steps
2006-11-01
President George W. Bush said on Tuesday the United States was looking at new ways to stop the violence in Darfur after getting a "grim" report about the humanitarian crisis from his special envoy.
I'd suggest an ultimatum to the Sudanese government to cease and desist. If they don't, begin bombing every manifestation of Sudanese military activity, from their MoD to Joe Jeep Jockey.
"The United States is going to work with the international community to come up with a single plan on how to address this issue and save lives," Bush said after meeting envoy Andrew Natsios, who spent 10 days in Sudan this month.
Unfortunately, we've been "working with the international community," which, as usual, suffers from testicular paralysis. Time passeth, and the slaughter continues while the striped pants set has some pretty good lunches.
"He came back with a grim report," Bush said. "The people who have suffered there need to know that the United States will work with others to help solve the problem. And the government of Sudan must understand that we're serious."
The government of Sudan would know we were serious of we began turning all Sudanese military installations into rubble and all Sudanese military equipment into scrap metal.
The Darfur conflict erupted in February 2003, when non-Arab rebels took up arms against the Sudanese government. In response, the government mobilized Arab militias known as Janjaweed, who have been accused of murder, rape and looting. An estimated 200,000 have been killed and 2.5 million forced to flee their homes during violence that has included rape, killing and looting.
But the UN can't bring itself to admit that 200,000 dead is genocide.
Although it declared more than two years ago that genocide had occurred in Darfur, the United States has been unable to stop the violence or to persuade the government to accept a U.N. peace-keeping force of up to 22,500 troops and police.
The U.S. calls it genocide. The UN calls it "unfortunate."
Bush, and a spokesman for British Prime Minister Tony Blair, both suggested they were looking at what more they can do but provided few details on how they might influence the Khartoum government. "We are reaching the crunch point. It's important that the Sudanese government be in no doubt at all of our seriousness," Blair's spokesman said after the British prime minister met Sudanese Vice President Salva Kiir in London.
Posted by:Fred

#8  Arclight Khartoum and watch this stuff stop. Use an F/A-18 armed escort and turn the arab capital into a typical arab cesspit. I'm sure Ethiopia will allow us to over-fly their territory, either on the way in or the way out. We already have SOME Buffs in Diego Garcia. It'll make for a long day, but those guys can handle it.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2006-11-01 13:40  

#7  Unfortunately, we've been "working with the international community," which, as usual, suffers from testicular paralysis.

No. The "international community" whole-heartedly endorses genocide. Look at how they treat the Palestinians.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2006-11-01 05:17  

#6  Iff God intended for Africa to be un-important, MADONNA would never had been pre-ordained 30-plus years ago to adopt an African child.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-11-01 04:24  

#5  go Mandy!
Posted by: Clkethel OHlkdj   2006-11-01 03:57  

#4  Western Liberals are screaming for the US to get involved but once we do they will be screaming that our troops are commiting atrocities and that we should leave before the job is done. Isn't that their MO? If they are so concerned about Dafur then they should suit up and stop the killing themselves. That is, if they can stop accusing and insulting our troops long enough to get their cowardly asses into gear!
Posted by: Mandy   2006-11-01 03:18  

#3  The last time the US wanted to show a big heart in an African country, we wound up in a "BlackHawk Down" situation. The sight of our boys being dragged around in the dust nude damn near drove me to a stroke back then (Thanks Les, and I hope your still dead!). Let the AU handle this and help with logistics and intelligence if need be. If other African governments and militaries don't give a s***, why should we. Save our guys for the winter offensive in Afghanistan, thats coming up.
Posted by: smn   2006-11-01 02:21  

#2  I say we make sure the people of Darfur are treated humanely.

Cut off all food shipments so they can starve to death. It's the right thing to do. Ask any liberal.
Posted by: badanov   2006-11-01 00:28  

#1  I'd suggest contemplating only. You have enough on your plate. I know, let Koffee handle this one.
Posted by: SpecOp35   2006-11-01 00:19  

00:00