| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Why the Democrats probably wonÂ’t win, even though it seems like their turn |
| 2006-11-04 |
| Posted by:anonymous5089 |
| #5 CARVILLE [paraphrased] > iff the Dems can't win even despite the seeming current probs-weaknesses of the GOP + Dubya, the entire premise-agenda-rationale for existence of the Democratic Party will have to be reviewed, re-evaluated, + reconsidered, or words to that effect. IMO, IOW the Dems/DemoLefties need a PC alibi-excuse to become the full-fledged SOCIALIST PARTY USA and later the CPUSA. Hated Despicable Nazi Fascist America = Well-meaning but Errorful Limited Commie Amerika will still have to surrender like WW2 VICHY PARIS to OWG, Global Socialism, + espec Mackinder's World Island aka OOOOOOOPPPPSIES RUSSIA-CHINA. Iff AMerika don't, 'tis still war agz America anytime after Year 2014 [China] - Year 2018 [Russia]. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2006-11-04 22:47 |
| #4 Policies? We don't need no stinking policies! LOL! That's about right! |
| Posted by: anon 2006-11-04 21:47 |
| #3 "is there anyone out there at all who can claim knowledge of what the democrat party stands for?" Sure. They stand for winning by using any trick in the book. They stand for season tickets at the 50 yd line for Redskins games. They stand for unending cocktail parties hosted by lobbyists. They stand for enjoying all the perks of power for the "annointed ones". Policies? We don't need no stinking policies! Al |
| Posted by: frozen al 2006-11-04 18:11 |
| #2 It's just like one can't figure why the socialist/commie LINKTV has most of its shows either on muslims or BDS. WTF do muzzies have to do with the communist dream state? They would eat commies for lunch and use the tuti-fruits from SanFran/Berkley for toliet paper. |
| Posted by: 3dc 2006-11-04 13:26 |
| #1 This can be expressed in psychological terms. The republicans are doing well because they focus on sanity, reason, organization and strategy. This works far better than the democrats haphazard attempts to emotionally stimulate the crowd of the minute with the emotionalism of the minute. The republicans might say that since they stand for things, they have root beliefs that are unchanging, they can plan months or years ahead, using these as axioms. But the democrats are philosophically vitiated; they not only stand for nothing, but they abhor standing for anything. While this is a position of opposition, it does not proactively lead to anything. It is not a plan. In fact, is there anyone out there at all who can claim knowledge of what the democrat party stands for? Every stance is qualified, even a retreat from Iraq and the War on Terror. They have no guiding force behind them. |
| Posted by: Anonymoose 2006-11-04 11:34 |