You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
British paratroopers on standby
2006-11-05

BRITISH defence chiefs have put a parachute regiment battalion on standby to jump into Afghanistan should fighting escalate with the Taliban, The Sunday Times said. It would be the first time that British paratroopers have jumped into action since the Suez conflict 50 years ago, said the weekly British newspaper.

Citing senior defence sources, the broadsheet said 600 troops from 2nd Battalion, the Parachute Regiment, were on standby to fly to Afghanistan within 12 hours and carry out an airborne landing within 24 hours.

Top British diplomats warned last week that a planned assault on opium producers was likely to result in heavy fighting, the newspaper said. Therefore, military planners have drawn up a contingency plan in which a parachute battalion would jump from six Hercules C-130 transport aircraft to reinforce British Royal Marines in southern Afghanistan.

Britain has around 5,000 troops in the war-shattered central Asian country.
Posted by:Oztralian

#12  I don't want a single trooper in Iran. I want nukes, lots of nukes. There is not one single thing in Iran worth dieing over. there are thousands of reasons to kill for. The logic is easy. They want to meet allah, we can arange it.

Listen to trailing wife, folks. Why give Islam any excuse to retaliate with atomic weapons? That would be insanity and remove all indignation for us, were we to be hit with a terrorist nuclear attack. I'm truly surprised you haven't gotten this by now. MOABs and JDAMS will destroy Iran just as well without the lingering fallout. Everything else you say, 49 Pan, I agree with. No boots on the ground, just boots up mullah ass.

Trust me, I understand the visceral satisfaction that would arise from watching mushroom clouds sprout like pistachio trees throughout Iran. Don't think I haven't considered it as well. Now is simply not the time.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-11-05 23:27  

#11  Would you be satisfied with Daisycutters and such, 49 Pan? It's just that there'd be less fussing later.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-11-05 20:52  

#10  I'm OK with that, 49 Pan.
Posted by: Kalle (kafir forever)   2006-11-05 17:22  

#9  I don't want a single trooper in Iran. I want nukes, lots of nukes. There is not one single thing in Iran worth dieing over. there are thousands of reasons to kill for. The logic is easy. They want to meet allah, we can arange it.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2006-11-05 17:11  

#8  I'd rather they acted in Iran if we need them -- there should be prioritized lists of objectives in WW IV too.
Posted by: Kalle (kafir forever)   2006-11-05 10:59  

#7  12 hour standby is SOP for any airborne unit on alert, so no OPSEC issue.

The enemy may know its a 12 hour standby, but they don't know WHICH 12 hours it is :-)
Posted by: OldSpook   2006-11-05 10:56  

#6  Paris, RJB.
Posted by: Skidmark   2006-11-05 10:53  

#5  I figured the story would be about dropping them into London. :/
Posted by: RJB in JC MO   2006-11-05 09:05  

#4  Excellent graphic.
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-11-05 07:45  

#3  Good Training.
Posted by: closedanger@hotmail.com   2006-11-05 06:24  

#2  Um maybe its me but 12 hour standby notice? Isn't that violating a bit of OPSEC?
Posted by: Valentine   2006-11-05 02:00  

#1  Airborne leads the way, even in the UK.
Posted by: OldSpook   2006-11-05 00:31  

00:00