You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
NATO raid kills up to 22 34 Taleban in Afghan south
2006-11-10
KANDAHAR, Afghanistan - NATO forces killed up to 22 Taleban fighters in an air strike in AfghanistanÂ’s southern province of Kandahar, Afghan and alliance officials said on Thursday. Residents said at least one woman was also killed in the raid on Wednesday evening in Zari district, southwest of the provincial capital, Kandahar city. They said cluster bombs were dropped in the attack on the district, scene of a major NATO offensive in September in which hundreds of Taleban were killed.
Cluster bombs have been in the news lately, haven't they?
A NATO official in Kabul said 20 insurgents were killed in WednesdayÂ’s raid, but had no further details. District police chief Ghulam Rasool said 22 rebels died.

The Taleban said only two guerrillas were killed in the air strike, which they said followed an ambush of NATO vehicles in the province.
"Lies! All lies!"

And from Pak Daily Times...
Clashes between insurgents and NATO-led and Afghan troops left 34 Taliban and three policemen dead in the latest violence in Afghanistan, officials said on Thursday. Eight policemen, eight Taliban and three civilians were also wounded during the fighting in volatile southern provinces of Kandahar, Zabul and southeastern Khost which erupted overnight and continued early Thursday, police said. Twenty-two Taliban were killed during a joint operation by Afghan army, police and NATO forces late Wednesday in the Pashmole area of Zahri district in Kandahar province, district police chief Ghulam Rasoul Aka said.

Fighting erupted again early Thursday in Pashmole when insurgents attacked a police vehicle, prompting a gunbattle which left six Taliban dead, Aka said. In Zabul, Taliban fighters ambushed a police patrol killing two policemen and wounding another five. In Khost, rebels attacked a highway police patrol late Wednesday, killing a policeman and wounding three others.
Posted by:Steve White

#9  Yep. That's it. We didn't really have much of an option, did we? Much as I hate to day it, but there are some times when Michael Savage is right.
Posted by: Lancasters Over Dresden   2006-11-10 21:47  

#8  LOD

This statement doesn't quite make sense,

"When confronted by that option, ..".

Do you mean instaed,

"When confronted by that AS THE ONLY option THAT THEY WILL GET,.."

or something like it???
Posted by: Uliling Wheatch6879   2006-11-10 13:58  

#7  Ugh!

Remember, we're a divided people that yearn to a return to BS. On Election Day, we got it and will have it for the next two years.
Posted by: Lancasters Over Dresden   2006-11-10 08:53  

#6  Correction to a correction:

Correction: "Clashes between insurgents and NATO-led and Afghan troops left 34 Taliban village idiot dimwits from Pakistan, who have nothing better to do with their dickless, sexless lives but to follow their Saudi-funded, Madrassa instructor's admonitions to go wage Jihad in the name of Allan, *very dead*."
Posted by: Lancasters Over Dresden   2006-11-10 08:51  

#5  Time to upgrade cluster bombs with depleted uranium for maximum BETTY CROCKERCRAT annoyance value. Build the things in a sweat shop of a smokey factory in the middle of a clear cut olde growth forrest in Oregon.
Posted by: Shipman   2006-11-10 08:50  

#4  Reflections on two quotes:

"Clashes between insurgents and NATO-led and Afghan troops left 34 Taliban and three policemen dead in the latest violence in Afghanistan, officials said on Thursday."

Correction: "Clashes between insurgents and NATO-led and Afghan troops left 34 Taliban village idiot dimwits from Pakistan, who have nothing better to do with their dickless, sexless lives but to follow their Saudi-funded, Madrassa instructor's admonitions to go wage Jihad in the name of Allan."

"Who is funding the Talibunnies?

I suspect our old friends the Saudis with the help of Paki ISI.

When will Bush confront Saudi re their use of funding terrorist whether in Iraq or Afghanistan????"
Posted by: Cheregum Crelet7867

Good guess. Answer to your question about when Wally Cleaver ... err, I mean Bush will go after the shitcan of radical Islam, that is the Saudi Magic Kingdom ... Never! And that perhaps explains why his party took a thumping. Americans want a victory, not a useless slog. When confronted by that option, they'll opt out, even if the long term consequences are dire. Remember, we're a divided peopl that yearn to a return of BS. On Election Day, we got it and will have it for the next tow years.
Posted by: Lancasters Over Dresden   2006-11-10 08:50  

#3  President Bush was never going to confront Saudi Arabia until the oil supply from Iraq was certain. Europe and the rest of the world are much more dependent on Saudi oil than is the US, which gets the majority of it's supply from Canada, Mexico and Venezuela.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-11-10 07:24  

#2  Who is funding the Talibunnies?

I suspect our old friends the Saudis with the help of Paki ISI.

When will Bush confront Saudi re their use of funding terrorist whether in Iraq or Afghanistan????
Posted by: Cheregum Crelet7867   2006-11-10 05:53  

#1  I guess there is an endless supply of blood sacrifice to allan. Apparently almost 100 confirmed killed...and we know the taliwhackers drag all of the dead bodies and wounded they can out.
Posted by: anymouse   2006-11-10 01:02  

00:00