| Submit your comments on this article |
| Iraq |
| THE FUTURE OF THE IRAQ STRATEGY |
| 2006-11-12 |
| Hat Tip: Front Page Magazine; Follow the link for a preety interesting map By Bill Roggio A change in strategy may be in order, but how much of a change will it be? The results of U.S. midterm elections will clearly have an impact on U.S. policy in Iraq. Less than one day after the Democrats took the House of Representative, and prior to the capture of the Senate, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld tendered his resignation. President Bush immediately stepped up with an nomination for Rumsfeld's replacement: Robert Gates, a former director of the CIA and a member of the Iraqi Study Group, the bipartisan team of experts assigned to search for answers to the problems in Iraq's development. STRATFOR's Fred Burton has an excellent analysis of the political implications of the election on Iraq policy and Mr. Gate's appointment as Secretary of Defense, which we will not replicate. There are two points which are worth highlighting. First, Mr. Burton notes that the election, while a rejection of the current strategy in Iraq, does not equate to approval of calls for withdrawal. "What is clear is that the U.S. electorate has shifted away from supporting the Bush administration's conduct of the war. What is not clear at all is what they have shifted toward. It is impossible to discern any consensus in the country as to what ought to be done," said Mr. Burton. This theory is backed by polling data from voters. While there is a clear majority that is unhappy with the current strategy, only one-third of the voters want a full withdrawal. A majority of the American public are searching for a solution, not the abandonment of Iraq. This has political implications on Iraq policy, and may temper the calls for withdrawal. |
| Posted by:FOTSGreg |
| #3 Nice analysis, JosephM. :-) |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2006-11-12 22:27 |
| #2 Means only that US voters want a clear, concise, objective Iraq + ME/Regional strategy, espec vv IRAN. Its a rejection of Bush 2 only within the narrow context/scope that mainstream America does NOT yet fully know, understand,andor comprehend the operating + LT objectives. THEY WANT CLARITY + RE-AFFIRMATION + CO-AFFIRMATION, ETC. OF POLICIES/PLANS, THEY WANT STRONGER + MORE EFFECTIVE MEASURES + LEADERSHIP, NOT WITHDRAWAL OR RETREAT. VICTORY, NOT APPEASEMENT = ENEMY ARMIES IN FUTURE IN OUR BACKYARD. Suppor for Dubya's policy of PRE-EMPTION is as strong as ever despite any Pol or MSM rhetoric to the contrary. THEY WANT PATTON + MACARTHUR, STORMING NORMAN + CHESTY PULLER, ETC. NOT POLITICAL GENERALS-ADMIRALS WITH XMAS TREES + RANK BUT NO GUMPTION OR PLAN OR DARING. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2006-11-12 22:10 |
| #1 Democratic incumbents are divided on how soon to pull troops out of Iraq, and the party risks being held responsible by voters in the 2008 presidential elections if an abandoned Iraq collapses into a full-blown civil war. Not if the Democrats' allies in the media step up their under-reporting. |
| Posted by: Pappy 2006-11-12 21:08 |