You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa Subsaharan
Botswanan columnist : Jacob Zuma must distribute White women among Black men!
2006-11-15
HT African crisis.

A Botswana newspaper columnist who has backed Jacob Zuma to become president so he could "distribute white women" among his supporters has outraged some people who have branded the column as "sexist", "racist" and "hate speech".

The offending column under the heading "President Zuma will sort out White People" was published in the Sunday Standard in Gaborone.

Loose Canon said Zuma as president would address the wrongs of the past.

He berated white people for complaining about their loss of privilege, affirmative action and crime and said "they should count themselves lucky they were not shot on the day of liberation. Perhaps it's not too late to hang a few whites... just to remind them who is in charge".

He dismissed the corruption charges against Zuma as the result of "some jealous blacks and their white friends".

"The people love Jacob Zuma... but, as part of sorting out ungrateful white people, I want him to embark on a redistribution exercise. I want him to distribute white women among the long-suffering black chaps.

"Zuma can have one or two white women himself and then distribute the rest 'to his loyal supporters' - including Loose Canon himself," he wrote.

Despite trying to contact the editor of the Sunday Standard, Outsa Mokone, for comment, no reply had been received at the time of going to press.
Posted by:anonymous5089

#11  GLENN BECK > Radical Islmaists are living in the 12th Century > wanna redo the Muslim Conquests.
HHHHMMMMMMM, SECULAR SOCIALIST-ATHEIST vs RADICAL ISLAMIST [GOD-BASED SOCIALIST], now comes vs RADICAL AFRICANIST/PAGANIST-NATURALIST [NATURE/RACE-BASED SOCIALIST??? PRIMITIVIST
??? TOTALITARIANIST???].
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-11-15 22:11  

#10  It's interesting to analyze the subtext of virtually all sit-coms and advertising on American TV these days.

It's impossible not to notice that all women are celebrated as strong, independant, smart, sexy, and deserving their natural right of near-worship as virtual goddesses. The vast majority of Black men are confident, handsome, strong and successful. On the other hand nearly all White men are portrayed as pathetic, dumb, easily manipulated submissive losers.

I don't know where this is all headed, but I know I don't like it.
Posted by: Scooter McGruder   2006-11-15 16:29  

#9  Feminism, like all leftist ideologies is founded on a contradiction.

Feminism isn't about women. It's about men.

Without men, feminists wouldn't exist; without men feminism itself wouldn't exist. Feminists know this all too well but the basic contradiction in their ideology disallows such an acknowledgement. Feminism itself would cease to exist were they to acknowledge it.

Feminists degrade men, call some remarks sexist, without revealing their very ideology is based on female genitalia, upon the very sexism they decry.

That is why feminists can be reliably silent in the face of an activity which clearly runs counter to their own interests, or even to their very survival. It's a contradiction, the same as their corrupt and degenerate ideology.
Posted by: badanov   2006-11-15 13:08  

#8  I am beginning to think the reason feminists and progressives never say a word about this sort of thing

Because they were never about women in the first place. Ok maybe some of them were, like lopt and others who fought battles more, in my opinion by their actions than their words. But the leaders were never about women they were about empowering themselves.
Posted by: anon   2006-11-15 12:23  

#7  Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. Except a little meaner and a little more corrupt. It's not like we haven't heard that song before.

Ever stop to ponder how fortunate we are that the American Revolution actually worked and did not devolve into a revolving door of corrupt, murderous dictators like so many People's Revolutions do? George Washington could have been King if he wanted to. Or President For Life, to use the modern vernacular. America, *bleep* yeah!
Posted by: SteveS   2006-11-15 10:36  

#6  I am beginning to think the reason feminists and progressives never say a word about this sort of thing - the billion strong Muslim rape-cult gets a free pass - is because of a deep-seated erotic charge they get from submission. They are going to get their wish. With the gimps in charge in Congress it looks like Western Civilization is going to get fcked.
Posted by: Excalibur   2006-11-15 10:13  

#5  Boputhuswana is far away
But we know it's in South Africa no matter what they say
You can't buy me I don't care what you pay
Don't ask me Sun City because I ain't gonna play

I ain't gonna play Sun City
Posted by: DepotGuy   2006-11-15 10:08  

#4  "Loose Canon"? Riiight.

If that column wasn't intended as a "Modest Proposal"-style satire from an opponent of Zuma's, I'll eat my pith helmet.
Posted by: Mitch H.   2006-11-15 08:50  

#3  Hey where da white wimmen at?
n will dey do my plantin?
Posted by: Farmin B. Hard   2006-11-15 08:48  

#2  words fail.
Posted by: anon   2006-11-15 07:40  

#1  When Zuma gets in (and he will), he'll make Zimbob look benevolent. South Africa will be lost and the West will say nothing, at all nothing.
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-11-15 07:09  

00:00