You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Leahy Seeks Documents on Detention
2006-11-22
Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-ACLUVt), who will chair the Senate Judiciary Committee next year, asked the Justice Department to leak release two newly acknowledged documents, which set U.S. policy on how terrorism suspects are detained and interrogated.

The CIA recently acknowledged the existence of the documents in response to a lawsuit by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed the American Civil Liberties Union.The first is a directive President Bush signed giving the CIA authority to establish detention facilities outside the United States and outlining interrogation methods that may be used against detainees.

The second is a 2002 memo from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel to the CIA's general counsel regarding interrogation methods that the spy agency may use against al-Qaeda leaders.

"The American people deserve to have detailed and accurate information about the role of the Bush administration in developing the interrogation policies and practices that have engendered such deep criticism and concern at the ACLU home and in France around the world," Leahy wrote Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales.

Leahy asked Gonzales to produce any revisions and analyses of those and other memos. He also requested agency documents that interpret the scope of interrogation practices permitted and prohibited by the Detainee Treatment Act or the Military Commissions Act.
You knowÂ…sourcesÂ…methodsÂ…or whatever you got.
"Doesn't matter, just send it all and we'll let the New York Times tell us what it all means."
The Justice Department will respond appropriately, spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said yesterday. But he added that "it is vital to protect national security secrets," particularly in sensitive programs overseen by the intelligence committees. Roehrkasse also said the department will weigh whether the documents being sought fall under the category of confidential deliberations, including legal advice.
Posted by:DepotGuy

#2  Give something particularly juicy and, well, fake to Leahy, with a clear statement that it's "preliminary" with a final report to come shortly. Give him a couple of weeks to think it over with the "preliminary" report.

Then give him a "final" report that completely refutes the "preliminary" report.

Both reports, of course, are classified.

At some point -- probably before the "final" report is delivered -- Leahy "or a staffer" will hand the information to the NYT.

Then declassify both reports, explain what was going on, and prosecute Leahy for the leak.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2006-11-22 12:57  

#1  The Dummocrats don't realize they weren't put into majority for their leadership qualities. They defaulted due to Pubs not in any way following party mandates. The Dummos have two years to build confidence in their capability to lead. Instead, like a new fast draw artiste, they can't wait to withdraw the pistole from the holster, and yank immediately on the trigger, blowing their family jewels completely off. Lead on Leahy, Conyers, Alcee Hastings, et al. After a few months of your frivolity you'll be out on your ass too.
Posted by: SpecOp35   2006-11-22 12:20  

00:00