Submit your comments on this article | |
Rantburg Tech Note: more comments on comments. | |
2006-11-26 | |
No changes since yesterday evening, but put your comments on comments here. Thanks,
| |
Posted by:Steve White |
#25 Looks like the tags are working good again! :-) |
Posted by: gorb 2006-11-26 15:35 |
#24 ![]() |
Posted by: pihkalbadger 2006-11-26 15:24 |
#23 I say damn the torpedos, let's go live with this puppy! |
Posted by: .com 2006-11-26 14:24 |
#22 TEST |
Posted by: Dave D. 2006-11-26 14:23 |
#21 TESTING testing |
Posted by: wxjames 2006-11-26 14:09 |
#20 Will the preview hang? Will the italics tags be accepted? Ahhhh. |
Posted by: Angie Schultz 2006-11-26 10:37 |
#19 It was OK except for Giant Bo Pilgrim. |
Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2006-11-26 10:29 |
#18 Ahhh... that's better. |
Posted by: Dave D. 2006-11-26 10:05 |
#17 Gimme that old time religon... All is well. And the Cookie Monster isn't beeping. |
Posted by: Shipman 2006-11-26 09:52 |
#16 Okay. It's back the way it was. That still leaves me with the problem of trying to make the buttons work with Mozilla (and Safari) family browsers. |
Posted by: Fred 2006-11-26 09:48 |
#15 Okay. I'll put it back. I'll try and find something else to hose today. |
Posted by: Fred 2006-11-26 09:28 |
#14 Yeah, I agree with Mister D. Maybe a super light version? |
Posted by: Shipman 2006-11-26 09:01 |
#13 I second, or third...whatever, the request to put comments back the way they were. If people want to jazz things up a bit, they can learn some basic HTML tags. This is annoying! |
Posted by: Mick Dundee 2006-11-26 08:36 |
#12 PLEASE get rid of this POS and put comments back the way they were before. Sheesh!!!!!!! |
Posted by: Dave D. 2006-11-26 08:03 |
#11 Now you see it, now you don't, heh. |
Posted by: .com 2006-11-26 06:07 |
#10 Hahhahahahahahahahaha! |
Posted by: Shipman 2006-11-26 06:06 |
#9 ![]() Nevermind. |
Posted by: Shipman 2006-11-26 06:06 |
#8 Someone loan me a clue about pictures. |
Posted by: Shipman 2006-11-26 06:03 |
#7 <img src="http://static.flickr.com/112/306446682_e8c3d50db7.jpg"/> |
Posted by: Shipman 2006-11-26 06:02 |
#6 Giant Bo Pilgrim Head |
Posted by: Shipman 2006-11-26 05:44 |
#5 Lol, Angie! |
Posted by: .com 2006-11-26 03:38 |
#4 Yep, still ugly. Preview still hanging too. Still scared by the tools. Ha ha! I can make my background an eye-gouging green! Tell me the truth. Does this color make my font look fat? I take it all back. I can be endlessly irritating with these babies tools |
Posted by: Angie Schultz 2006-11-26 01:41 |
#3 I was scared by all the funny tools. The preview hung on me. It no longer accepts a simple honest italics tag. You know what I'd like, now that we're making unreasonable demands? I'd like to be able to put in my website and have it make a link, like it does when you put in an email address. Maybe it does that now, but I haven't put in my blog name in ages, because it wouldn't just hotlink my name, but insisted on spelling out the blog name, and that uglied up the name field. Let's see if it still does that. |
Posted by: Angie Schultz 2006-11-26 01:34 |
#2 I like the old way. This has too much flash....better to say something than dick around with making it pretty. I swear that people in the USA spend 50% of their time futzing with the formatting in MS Word. Could attract a bad element. It seems that to get the preview to work you have to View Source (and optionally unview source) first. I need to do that after every change. |
Posted by: KBK 2006-11-26 01:20 |
#1 Fred, Ctrl keys are allowing sneak & peek into comment html commands at times. <BLINK>We'd Better Bolt Down The Hatch Covers</BLINK> |
Posted by: RD 2006-11-26 00:45 |